Davide Previtali, Angelo Boffa, Giorgio Di Laura Frattura, Giulia Merli, Giuseppe Filardo
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎关节内注射的安慰剂反应:大小,随时间的演变和影响因素。系统回顾和meta回归分析。","authors":"Davide Previtali, Angelo Boffa, Giorgio Di Laura Frattura, Giulia Merli, Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2025-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the response to intra-articular saline administration in terms of pain, function, and quality of life, with a focus on the evolution of placebo response over time and the identification of influencing factors on the placebo response to knee osteoarthritis injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After registration on PROSPERO, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials on intra-articular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis. The placebo response was evaluated through meta-analyses of VAS pain, WOMAC, KOOS, and responder rates at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months on placebo arms of included trials. The evolution of placebo response over time was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following Cochrane guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial 2,746 records, 73 articles on 5,895 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, placebo response declined and was no longer clinically significant for some sub-scores. Responder rates exceeded 50% at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. The placebo response was stronger in studies with a higher proportion of female participants and in more recently published trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Placebo response to intra-articular injections is statistically and clinically significant in knee osteoarthritis for pain, function improvement, and patients' quality of life, with responses peaking at 4-8 months but evidence up to 12 months. Among influencing factors, female sex and recent publications seem to present stronger placebo responses, emphasising the importance of placebo-controlled trials to evaluate knee osteoarthritis treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 10","pages":"782-795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Placebo response to intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: magnitude, evolution over time, and influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Previtali, Angelo Boffa, Giorgio Di Laura Frattura, Giulia Merli, Giuseppe Filardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-2025-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the response to intra-articular saline administration in terms of pain, function, and quality of life, with a focus on the evolution of placebo response over time and the identification of influencing factors on the placebo response to knee osteoarthritis injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After registration on PROSPERO, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials on intra-articular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis. The placebo response was evaluated through meta-analyses of VAS pain, WOMAC, KOOS, and responder rates at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months on placebo arms of included trials. The evolution of placebo response over time was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following Cochrane guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the initial 2,746 records, 73 articles on 5,895 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, placebo response declined and was no longer clinically significant for some sub-scores. Responder rates exceeded 50% at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. The placebo response was stronger in studies with a higher proportion of female participants and in more recently published trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Placebo response to intra-articular injections is statistically and clinically significant in knee osteoarthritis for pain, function improvement, and patients' quality of life, with responses peaking at 4-8 months but evidence up to 12 months. Among influencing factors, female sex and recent publications seem to present stronger placebo responses, emphasising the importance of placebo-controlled trials to evaluate knee osteoarthritis treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"782-795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495556/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Placebo response to intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: magnitude, evolution over time, and influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Purpose: To quantify the response to intra-articular saline administration in terms of pain, function, and quality of life, with a focus on the evolution of placebo response over time and the identification of influencing factors on the placebo response to knee osteoarthritis injections.
Methods: After registration on PROSPERO, a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials on intra-articular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis. The placebo response was evaluated through meta-analyses of VAS pain, WOMAC, KOOS, and responder rates at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months on placebo arms of included trials. The evolution of placebo response over time was assessed, and meta-regression was conducted. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed following Cochrane guidelines.
Results: From the initial 2,746 records, 73 articles on 5,895 patients were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, placebo response declined and was no longer clinically significant for some sub-scores. Responder rates exceeded 50% at 1-, 3-, and 6-months. The placebo response was stronger in studies with a higher proportion of female participants and in more recently published trials.
Conclusions: Placebo response to intra-articular injections is statistically and clinically significant in knee osteoarthritis for pain, function improvement, and patients' quality of life, with responses peaking at 4-8 months but evidence up to 12 months. Among influencing factors, female sex and recent publications seem to present stronger placebo responses, emphasising the importance of placebo-controlled trials to evaluate knee osteoarthritis treatments.
期刊介绍:
EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity.
This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances.
One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress.
EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.