Jaana Ronkainen, Erika Jääskeläinen, Päivi Tossavainen, Tanja Nordström, Jukka Ronkainen
{"title":"青少年神经性厌食症在初级保健治疗与家庭为基础的方法-长期结果。","authors":"Jaana Ronkainen, Erika Jääskeläinen, Päivi Tossavainen, Tanja Nordström, Jukka Ronkainen","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2564795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anorexia nervosa is a potentially lethal psychiatric disorder characterised by restrictive eating and weight loss. Adolescent patients were treated as outpatients using a novel method which involved coaching the parents to take full responsibility for their child's nutrition. In this follow-up cohort study, we compared the long-term outcomes of patients treated in primary care using the family-based coaching method (FBcM-PC) with those treated in tertiary care using traditional treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included all adolescent patients with a restrictive eating disorder treated initially in Oulu University Hospital and/or Oulu Primary Health Care centre between 2013 and 2019. Patients (<i>n</i> = 168) were contacted and asked to fill out a health questionnaire. Altogether 73 (43%) responded (30 from the FBcM-PC and 43 from the traditional treatment group). The outcome variables - depression, anxiety, eating disorder symptoms and need for medical appointments - were compared between the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon follow-up after a mean of 6.6 years, 77% of the FBcM-PC and 54% of the traditional treatment groups did not need medical appointments (<i>p</i> = 0.052). No differences were found in self-reported health, depression or anxiety between the study groups. Concerns about weight and shape were reported by 40% of both groups. 87% of the FBcM-PC and 9% of the traditional treatment group received outpatient treatment only (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescent anorexia nervosa patients treated mainly in primary care had at least as favourable long-term outcomes as those treated in tertiary care. The results of this study encourage further development of outpatient treatment methods in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent anorexia nervosa treated in primary care with a family-based method - long-term outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jaana Ronkainen, Erika Jääskeläinen, Päivi Tossavainen, Tanja Nordström, Jukka Ronkainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2025.2564795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anorexia nervosa is a potentially lethal psychiatric disorder characterised by restrictive eating and weight loss. Adolescent patients were treated as outpatients using a novel method which involved coaching the parents to take full responsibility for their child's nutrition. In this follow-up cohort study, we compared the long-term outcomes of patients treated in primary care using the family-based coaching method (FBcM-PC) with those treated in tertiary care using traditional treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included all adolescent patients with a restrictive eating disorder treated initially in Oulu University Hospital and/or Oulu Primary Health Care centre between 2013 and 2019. Patients (<i>n</i> = 168) were contacted and asked to fill out a health questionnaire. Altogether 73 (43%) responded (30 from the FBcM-PC and 43 from the traditional treatment group). The outcome variables - depression, anxiety, eating disorder symptoms and need for medical appointments - were compared between the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon follow-up after a mean of 6.6 years, 77% of the FBcM-PC and 54% of the traditional treatment groups did not need medical appointments (<i>p</i> = 0.052). No differences were found in self-reported health, depression or anxiety between the study groups. Concerns about weight and shape were reported by 40% of both groups. 87% of the FBcM-PC and 9% of the traditional treatment group received outpatient treatment only (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescent anorexia nervosa patients treated mainly in primary care had at least as favourable long-term outcomes as those treated in tertiary care. The results of this study encourage further development of outpatient treatment methods in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2564795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2564795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adolescent anorexia nervosa treated in primary care with a family-based method - long-term outcomes.
Background: Anorexia nervosa is a potentially lethal psychiatric disorder characterised by restrictive eating and weight loss. Adolescent patients were treated as outpatients using a novel method which involved coaching the parents to take full responsibility for their child's nutrition. In this follow-up cohort study, we compared the long-term outcomes of patients treated in primary care using the family-based coaching method (FBcM-PC) with those treated in tertiary care using traditional treatment.
Methods: The cohort included all adolescent patients with a restrictive eating disorder treated initially in Oulu University Hospital and/or Oulu Primary Health Care centre between 2013 and 2019. Patients (n = 168) were contacted and asked to fill out a health questionnaire. Altogether 73 (43%) responded (30 from the FBcM-PC and 43 from the traditional treatment group). The outcome variables - depression, anxiety, eating disorder symptoms and need for medical appointments - were compared between the treatment groups.
Results: Upon follow-up after a mean of 6.6 years, 77% of the FBcM-PC and 54% of the traditional treatment groups did not need medical appointments (p = 0.052). No differences were found in self-reported health, depression or anxiety between the study groups. Concerns about weight and shape were reported by 40% of both groups. 87% of the FBcM-PC and 9% of the traditional treatment group received outpatient treatment only (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Adolescent anorexia nervosa patients treated mainly in primary care had at least as favourable long-term outcomes as those treated in tertiary care. The results of this study encourage further development of outpatient treatment methods in primary care.
期刊介绍:
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice.
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include:
• Clinical family medicine
• Epidemiological research
• Qualitative research
• Health services research.