吉西他滨、顺铂加聚合胶束紫杉醇与晚期胆道癌生存率:一项随机临床试验

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim
{"title":"吉西他滨、顺铂加聚合胶束紫杉醇与晚期胆道癌生存率:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2534560"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"e2534560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:关于在标准化疗中加入紫杉烷在晚期胆道癌症一线治疗中的作用的前瞻性数据有限,特别是在胆道癌症最普遍的亚洲人群中。目的:评价聚氧基化无蓖麻油聚合胶束紫杉醇制剂(以下简称聚合胶束紫杉醇)联合吉西他滨和顺铂治疗未治疗的晚期胆道癌患者的疗效和安全性。设计、环境和参与者:这项开放标签的3期随机临床试验于2019年9月1日至2022年10月31日在韩国的7个中心进行。如果患者以前未接受治疗,局部晚期不可切除,复发或转移性胆管腺癌,年龄19至79岁,东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为0至2,并且根据实体肿瘤反应评估标准1.1版具有可测量或可评估的病变,则符合条件。干预措施:患者随机接受聚合胶束紫杉醇100mg /m2;吉西他滨,800 mg/m2;顺铂25 mg/m2;第1天和第8天或吉西他滨1000mg /m2,顺铂25mg /m2,第1天和第8天每21天。两组共计划9个周期。主要结局和测量:主要终点为总生存期。次要终点包括研究者评估和盲法独立中心评价的无进展生存期、客观缓解率和安全性。结果:共有150例患者(年龄中位[范围]65岁[41-79]岁,男性87例[58%])被随机分配到研究中(吉西他滨和顺铂联合聚合胶束紫杉醇组74例,吉西他滨和顺铂组76例)。由于患者累积缓慢,该研究被提前终止。中位(IQR)随访时间为10.4(6.5-16.7)个月。吉西他滨和顺铂联合聚合胶束紫杉醇组的中位总生存期为12.0 (95% CI, 9.99 -15.8)个月,吉西他滨和顺铂组的中位总生存期为11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5)个月(风险比为0.94;95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = 0.76)。盲法独立中心评估和研究者评估的无进展生存期以及客观缓解率在两组之间无显著差异。没有观察到意外的安全信号。结论及相关性:在这项随机临床试验中,与吉西他滨和顺铂联合使用聚合物胶束紫杉醇相比,吉西他滨和顺铂联合使用未改善先前未经治疗的晚期胆道癌患者的生存率。本研究进一步证明了晚期胆道癌加紫杉烷强化化疗的局限性。试验注册:cris.ni.go .kr标识符:KCT0003726。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.

Design, setting, and participants: This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.

Results: A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Trial registration: cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信