Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim
{"title":"吉西他滨、顺铂加聚合胶束紫杉醇与晚期胆道癌生存率:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2534560"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hyehyun Jeong, Changhoon Yoo, Ilhwan Kim, Jung Hun Kang, Jae Ho Jeong, Kwonoh Park, Sang-Bo Oh, Inkeun Park, Sun Jin Sym, Jaekyung Cheon, Hyewon Ryu, Jun Eul Hwang, Ji Sung Lee, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Kyu-Pyo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>cris.nih.go.kr identifier: KCT0003726.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"e2534560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.34560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Plus Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel and Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Limited prospective data exist on the role of adding taxane to standard chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers, especially in the Asian population, where biliary tract cancers are most prevalent.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of polyethoxylated castor oil-free polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel (hereafter, polymeric micellar paclitaxel), in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with untreated advanced biliary tract cancers.
Design, setting, and participants: This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted across 7 centers in South Korea from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Patients were eligible if they had previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the bile duct, were aged 19 to 79 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 to 2, and had measurable or evaluable lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumorsversion 1.1.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either polymeric micellar paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2; gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2; and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; on days 1 and 8 or gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A total of 9 cycles were planned for both groups.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed and blinded independent central review-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety.
Results: A total of 150 patients (median [range] age, 65 [41-79] years; 87 [58%] male) were randomly assigned to the study (74 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 76 in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group). The study was prematurely terminated due to slow patient accrual. The median (IQR) follow-up duration was 10.4 (6.5-16.7) months. The median overall survival was 12.0 (95% CI, 9.9-15.8) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel group and 11.1 (95% CI, 9.7-13.5) months in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63-1.41; P = .76). Both blinded independent central review-assessed and investigator-assessed progression-free survival as well as the objective response rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. No unanticipated safety signals were observed.
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with polymeric micellar paclitaxel did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin combined in patients with previously untreated advanced biliary tract cancer. This study provides further evidence regarding the limitations of intensified chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes in advanced biliary tract cancer.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health.
JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.