包括调节电热在内的综合自然疗法对多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Integrative Cancer Therapies Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1177/15347354251378069
Sara Izadi-Najafabadi, Lisa McQuarrie, Gurdev Parmar
{"title":"包括调节电热在内的综合自然疗法对多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存结局的影响:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Sara Izadi-Najafabadi, Lisa McQuarrie, Gurdev Parmar","doi":"10.1177/15347354251378069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that integrative oncology approaches may provide survival benefits when combined with conventional treatments. This study examines whether an integrative oncology treatment plan incorporating modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) improves survival in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from GBM patients treated at the Integrated Health Clinic (IHC) between 2010 and 2024. Survival outcomes were compared between IHC patients receiving adjuvant integrative naturopathic therapies and a matched control group from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to assess survival differences. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of treatment timing (≤120 days vs >120 days post-diagnosis) and age on survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrative treatment cohort demonstrated a lower hazard of mortality than the SEER group (HR = .72, 95% CI: .53-1.00, <i>P</i>-value = .05). The treatment benefit was greater among IHC patients who started treatment within 120 days of diagnosis (HR = .52, 95% CI: .33-.83, <i>P</i>-value = .006) and those under age 50 (HR = .51, 95% CI: .31-.85, <i>P</i>-value = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that an integrative naturopathic approach incorporating mEHT may improve survival outcomes in GBM patients. Patients initiating integrative treatment earlier experienced a greater survival benefit, as did patients under 50 years of age. Further studies, ideally prospective randomized controlled trials, are warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"24 ","pages":"15347354251378069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Including Modulated Electrohyperthermia on Survival Outcome among Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Izadi-Najafabadi, Lisa McQuarrie, Gurdev Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347354251378069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that integrative oncology approaches may provide survival benefits when combined with conventional treatments. This study examines whether an integrative oncology treatment plan incorporating modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) improves survival in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from GBM patients treated at the Integrated Health Clinic (IHC) between 2010 and 2024. Survival outcomes were compared between IHC patients receiving adjuvant integrative naturopathic therapies and a matched control group from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to assess survival differences. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of treatment timing (≤120 days vs >120 days post-diagnosis) and age on survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrative treatment cohort demonstrated a lower hazard of mortality than the SEER group (HR = .72, 95% CI: .53-1.00, <i>P</i>-value = .05). The treatment benefit was greater among IHC patients who started treatment within 120 days of diagnosis (HR = .52, 95% CI: .33-.83, <i>P</i>-value = .006) and those under age 50 (HR = .51, 95% CI: .31-.85, <i>P</i>-value = .009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that an integrative naturopathic approach incorporating mEHT may improve survival outcomes in GBM patients. Patients initiating integrative treatment earlier experienced a greater survival benefit, as did patients under 50 years of age. Further studies, ideally prospective randomized controlled trials, are warranted to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"15347354251378069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354251378069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354251378069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种侵袭性脑肿瘤,治疗方案有限,预后差。新出现的证据表明,当与常规治疗相结合时,综合肿瘤学方法可能提供生存益处。本研究探讨了结合调制电热疗法(mEHT)的综合肿瘤学治疗方案是否能提高GBM患者的生存率。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2010年至2024年间在综合健康诊所(IHC)治疗的GBM患者的数据。比较接受辅助综合自然疗法的IHC患者和来自国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的匹配对照组的生存结果。Kaplan-Meier生存估计和Cox比例风险模型评估生存差异。二次分析评估了治疗时间(≤120天vs诊断后120天)和年龄对生存的影响。结果:综合治疗组的死亡率比SEER组低(HR =。72, 95% CI: 0.53 -1.00, p值= 0.05)。在诊断后120天内开始治疗的IHC患者的治疗效果更大(HR =。52, 95% CI: 0.33 ~ 0.83, p值=。006)和50岁以下(HR =。51, 95% CI: 0.31 - 0.85, p值= 0.009)。结论:研究结果表明,结合mEHT的综合自然疗法可能改善GBM患者的生存结果。早期开始综合治疗的患者有更大的生存获益,50岁以下的患者也是如此。进一步的研究,理想的前瞻性随机对照试验,有必要验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Including Modulated Electrohyperthermia on Survival Outcome among Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Retrospective Study.

The Effect of Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Including Modulated Electrohyperthermia on Survival Outcome among Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Retrospective Study.

The Effect of Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Including Modulated Electrohyperthermia on Survival Outcome among Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Retrospective Study.

The Effect of Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Including Modulated Electrohyperthermia on Survival Outcome among Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Emerging evidence suggests that integrative oncology approaches may provide survival benefits when combined with conventional treatments. This study examines whether an integrative oncology treatment plan incorporating modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) improves survival in GBM patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from GBM patients treated at the Integrated Health Clinic (IHC) between 2010 and 2024. Survival outcomes were compared between IHC patients receiving adjuvant integrative naturopathic therapies and a matched control group from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox proportional hazard models were conducted to assess survival differences. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of treatment timing (≤120 days vs >120 days post-diagnosis) and age on survival.

Results: The integrative treatment cohort demonstrated a lower hazard of mortality than the SEER group (HR = .72, 95% CI: .53-1.00, P-value = .05). The treatment benefit was greater among IHC patients who started treatment within 120 days of diagnosis (HR = .52, 95% CI: .33-.83, P-value = .006) and those under age 50 (HR = .51, 95% CI: .31-.85, P-value = .009).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that an integrative naturopathic approach incorporating mEHT may improve survival outcomes in GBM patients. Patients initiating integrative treatment earlier experienced a greater survival benefit, as did patients under 50 years of age. Further studies, ideally prospective randomized controlled trials, are warranted to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信