肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的解剖表观遗传年龄加速。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Polina Merbaum, Ramona Zwamborn, Paul Hop, Project MinE Als Sequencing Consortium, Wouter van Rheenen, Jan Veldink
{"title":"肌萎缩性侧索硬化症的解剖表观遗传年龄加速。","authors":"Polina Merbaum, Ramona Zwamborn, Paul Hop, Project MinE Als Sequencing Consortium, Wouter van Rheenen, Jan Veldink","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2025.2563502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We compared signatures of epigenetic aging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and healthy controls to investigate the role of potential confounders and genetic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used whole-blood methylome profiles for 5,146 ALS patients and 2,156 controls available for Project MinE. We predicted biological age with three generations of epigenetic clocks and estimated age acceleration by regressing our model on control individuals to evaluate case/control differences. To investigate the contribution of <i>C9orf72</i> expansions, we regressed the model on <i>C9orf72</i>-negative ALS patients. The predicted DunedinPACE pace of aging and telomere length additionally characterized aging dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that white blood cell type proportions confound the previously observed increase in the pace of biological aging in ALS. When correcting for cell counts, there is no evidence for accelerated epigenetic aging compared to controls, except for ALS patients with the <i>C9orf72</i> repeat expansion. None of the epigenetic age acceleration scores contributed to survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed no significant difference in the pace of biological agingbetween ALS patients and controls, except for ALS patients carrying the <i>C9orf72</i> mutation. We emphasize the importance of altered white blood cell proportions in general ALS pathophysiology as opposed to accelerated aging per se.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting epigenetic age acceleration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Polina Merbaum, Ramona Zwamborn, Paul Hop, Project MinE Als Sequencing Consortium, Wouter van Rheenen, Jan Veldink\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17501911.2025.2563502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We compared signatures of epigenetic aging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and healthy controls to investigate the role of potential confounders and genetic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used whole-blood methylome profiles for 5,146 ALS patients and 2,156 controls available for Project MinE. We predicted biological age with three generations of epigenetic clocks and estimated age acceleration by regressing our model on control individuals to evaluate case/control differences. To investigate the contribution of <i>C9orf72</i> expansions, we regressed the model on <i>C9orf72</i>-negative ALS patients. The predicted DunedinPACE pace of aging and telomere length additionally characterized aging dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that white blood cell type proportions confound the previously observed increase in the pace of biological aging in ALS. When correcting for cell counts, there is no evidence for accelerated epigenetic aging compared to controls, except for ALS patients with the <i>C9orf72</i> repeat expansion. None of the epigenetic age acceleration scores contributed to survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed no significant difference in the pace of biological agingbetween ALS patients and controls, except for ALS patients carrying the <i>C9orf72</i> mutation. We emphasize the importance of altered white blood cell proportions in general ALS pathophysiology as opposed to accelerated aging per se.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epigenomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epigenomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2025.2563502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2025.2563502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们比较了肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者和健康对照者的表观遗传衰老特征,以探讨潜在混杂因素和遗传亚群的作用。方法:我们使用了5146名ALS患者和2156名对照者的全血甲基组图谱。我们用三代表观遗传时钟预测生物年龄,并通过对对照个体的回归模型来估计年龄加速,以评估病例/对照组的差异。为了研究C9orf72扩增的贡献,我们对C9orf72阴性ALS患者的模型进行了回归。预测的DunedinPACE衰老速度和端粒长度也表征了衰老动态。结果:我们发现白细胞类型比例与先前观察到的ALS生物衰老速度的增加相混淆。当校正细胞计数时,除了C9orf72重复扩增的ALS患者外,没有证据表明与对照组相比会加速表观遗传衰老。所有的表观遗传年龄加速评分都与生存无关。结论:我们的研究显示,除了携带C9orf72突变的ALS患者外,ALS患者和对照组之间的生物衰老速度没有显著差异。我们强调白细胞比例改变在一般ALS病理生理中的重要性,而不是加速衰老本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissecting epigenetic age acceleration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Aim: We compared signatures of epigenetic aging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and healthy controls to investigate the role of potential confounders and genetic subgroups.

Methods: We used whole-blood methylome profiles for 5,146 ALS patients and 2,156 controls available for Project MinE. We predicted biological age with three generations of epigenetic clocks and estimated age acceleration by regressing our model on control individuals to evaluate case/control differences. To investigate the contribution of C9orf72 expansions, we regressed the model on C9orf72-negative ALS patients. The predicted DunedinPACE pace of aging and telomere length additionally characterized aging dynamics.

Results: We found that white blood cell type proportions confound the previously observed increase in the pace of biological aging in ALS. When correcting for cell counts, there is no evidence for accelerated epigenetic aging compared to controls, except for ALS patients with the C9orf72 repeat expansion. None of the epigenetic age acceleration scores contributed to survival.

Conclusion: Our study revealed no significant difference in the pace of biological agingbetween ALS patients and controls, except for ALS patients carrying the C9orf72 mutation. We emphasize the importance of altered white blood cell proportions in general ALS pathophysiology as opposed to accelerated aging per se.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epigenomics
Epigenomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community. Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信