斯洛文尼亚初级保健的临床药师处方者:前瞻性非随机介入研究侧重于临床结果和生活质量。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480
Matej Stuhec, Alenka Kovacic, Marjetka Korpar, Ana Banovic Koscak, Barbara Koder, Dunja Mahoric, Spela Bernik Golubic, Eva Gorup Cedilnik, Vesna Homar, Aleksandar Stepanovic, Danica Rotar Pavlic
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚初级保健的临床药师处方者:前瞻性非随机介入研究侧重于临床结果和生活质量。","authors":"Matej Stuhec, Alenka Kovacic, Marjetka Korpar, Ana Banovic Koscak, Barbara Koder, Dunja Mahoric, Spela Bernik Golubic, Eva Gorup Cedilnik, Vesna Homar, Aleksandar Stepanovic, Danica Rotar Pavlic","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical pharmacist prescribers in primary care settings and their impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes have not been described outside English-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this prospective interventional pilot study was to assess the impact of pharmacist prescribers on clinical results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while describing their development, evaluation, and implementation in Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, 6-month, interventional, non-randomised study started in November 2024 and concluded in June 2025 in four primary care settings in Slovenia. Clinical pharmacists reviewed medications of patients and additionally prescribed medications based on the Collaborative Practice Agreement (CPA). In this process, they cooperated with patients and general practitioners (GPs). Only patients with an established diagnosis for selected non-communicable chronic conditions were included. The primary outcomes were changes in PROs, including quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS), and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Secondary outcomes included the prescription acceptance rate by GPs (percentage) and adherence to treatment guidelines. Tertiary outcomes involved the number of prescriptions that met the predefined clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 119 patients, with a mean age of 72.3 years (SD = 10.0). Quality of life improved from 63.6/100 (SD = 18.7) at baseline to 71.4/100 (SD = 15.9) at the end of the study (p = 0.000), with a corresponding QALY difference of 0.0252. The effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.448 (95% CI: 0.084 to 0.812. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.0. During the study, clinical pharmacists prescribed 264 prescriptions to 119 patients, resulting in an acceptance rate of 91.3%. Adherence to treatment guidelines improved significantly (29.8% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.000). The effect size, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), was 25.7 (95% CI: 15.6-42.4). The number of prescriptions achieving the predefined clinical outcomes was significantly higher at the end of the study (70.8% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.000), with an OR of 33.9 (95% CI: 19.1-60.4). Deprescribing accounted for 25.3% of all protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that prescriptions made by clinical pharmacists in collaboration with GPs, as specified in the CPA, improved PROs and clinical outcomes for predefined conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1690480"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical pharmacist prescriber in primary care in Slovenia: prospective non-randomised interventional study focused on clinical outcomes and quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"Matej Stuhec, Alenka Kovacic, Marjetka Korpar, Ana Banovic Koscak, Barbara Koder, Dunja Mahoric, Spela Bernik Golubic, Eva Gorup Cedilnik, Vesna Homar, Aleksandar Stepanovic, Danica Rotar Pavlic\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical pharmacist prescribers in primary care settings and their impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes have not been described outside English-speaking countries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this prospective interventional pilot study was to assess the impact of pharmacist prescribers on clinical results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while describing their development, evaluation, and implementation in Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, 6-month, interventional, non-randomised study started in November 2024 and concluded in June 2025 in four primary care settings in Slovenia. Clinical pharmacists reviewed medications of patients and additionally prescribed medications based on the Collaborative Practice Agreement (CPA). In this process, they cooperated with patients and general practitioners (GPs). Only patients with an established diagnosis for selected non-communicable chronic conditions were included. The primary outcomes were changes in PROs, including quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS), and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Secondary outcomes included the prescription acceptance rate by GPs (percentage) and adherence to treatment guidelines. Tertiary outcomes involved the number of prescriptions that met the predefined clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 119 patients, with a mean age of 72.3 years (SD = 10.0). Quality of life improved from 63.6/100 (SD = 18.7) at baseline to 71.4/100 (SD = 15.9) at the end of the study (p = 0.000), with a corresponding QALY difference of 0.0252. The effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.448 (95% CI: 0.084 to 0.812. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.0. During the study, clinical pharmacists prescribed 264 prescriptions to 119 patients, resulting in an acceptance rate of 91.3%. Adherence to treatment guidelines improved significantly (29.8% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.000). The effect size, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), was 25.7 (95% CI: 15.6-42.4). The number of prescriptions achieving the predefined clinical outcomes was significantly higher at the end of the study (70.8% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.000), with an OR of 33.9 (95% CI: 19.1-60.4). Deprescribing accounted for 25.3% of all protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that prescriptions made by clinical pharmacists in collaboration with GPs, as specified in the CPA, improved PROs and clinical outcomes for predefined conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1690480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477041/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:初级保健机构的临床药师开处方者及其对患者报告结果(PROs)和临床结果的影响尚未在英语国家以外的国家得到描述。目的:这项前瞻性干预性试点研究的目的是评估药剂师开处方者对临床结果和患者报告结果(PROs)的影响,同时描述他们在斯洛文尼亚的发展、评估和实施。方法:这项为期6个月的前瞻性、干预性、非随机研究于2024年11月开始,于2025年6月在斯洛文尼亚的四个初级保健机构中结束。临床药师根据合作实践协议(CPA)对患者的药物进行审查,并额外开出药物。在这个过程中,他们与患者和全科医生(gp)合作。只有确诊为特定非传染性慢性病的患者被纳入研究。主要结局是PROs的变化,包括生活质量(通过EQ-5D-VAS评估)和用药适宜性指数(MAI)。次要结局包括全科医生的处方接受率(百分比)和对治疗指南的依从性。第三阶段结果包括满足预定临床结果的处方数量。结果:纳入119例患者,平均年龄72.3岁(SD = 10.0)。生活质量从基线时的63.6/100 (SD = 18.7)改善到研究结束时的71.4/100 (SD = 15.9) (p = 0.000),相应的QALY差异为0.0252。效应量(Cohen’s d)为0.448 (95% CI: 0.084 ~ 0.812)。需要治疗的数量(NNT)为4.0。研究期间,临床药师共为119例患者开处方264张,合格率为91.3%。治疗指南的依从性显著提高(29.8% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.000)。以优势比(OR)表示的效应量为25.7 (95% CI: 15.6-42.4)。在研究结束时,达到预定临床结果的处方数量显著增加(70.8% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.000), OR为33.9 (95% CI: 19.1-60.4)。处方解除占所有方案的25.3%。结论:本研究表明,临床药师与全科医生合作的处方,按照CPA的规定,提高了预见性疾病的PROs和临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical pharmacist prescriber in primary care in Slovenia: prospective non-randomised interventional study focused on clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Introduction: Clinical pharmacist prescribers in primary care settings and their impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical outcomes have not been described outside English-speaking countries.

Aim: The aim of this prospective interventional pilot study was to assess the impact of pharmacist prescribers on clinical results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), while describing their development, evaluation, and implementation in Slovenia.

Methods: This prospective, 6-month, interventional, non-randomised study started in November 2024 and concluded in June 2025 in four primary care settings in Slovenia. Clinical pharmacists reviewed medications of patients and additionally prescribed medications based on the Collaborative Practice Agreement (CPA). In this process, they cooperated with patients and general practitioners (GPs). Only patients with an established diagnosis for selected non-communicable chronic conditions were included. The primary outcomes were changes in PROs, including quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS), and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Secondary outcomes included the prescription acceptance rate by GPs (percentage) and adherence to treatment guidelines. Tertiary outcomes involved the number of prescriptions that met the predefined clinical outcomes.

Results: The study included 119 patients, with a mean age of 72.3 years (SD = 10.0). Quality of life improved from 63.6/100 (SD = 18.7) at baseline to 71.4/100 (SD = 15.9) at the end of the study (p = 0.000), with a corresponding QALY difference of 0.0252. The effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.448 (95% CI: 0.084 to 0.812. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.0. During the study, clinical pharmacists prescribed 264 prescriptions to 119 patients, resulting in an acceptance rate of 91.3%. Adherence to treatment guidelines improved significantly (29.8% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.000). The effect size, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), was 25.7 (95% CI: 15.6-42.4). The number of prescriptions achieving the predefined clinical outcomes was significantly higher at the end of the study (70.8% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.000), with an OR of 33.9 (95% CI: 19.1-60.4). Deprescribing accounted for 25.3% of all protocols.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that prescriptions made by clinical pharmacists in collaboration with GPs, as specified in the CPA, improved PROs and clinical outcomes for predefined conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信