Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe, Karolien Van Orshoven, Suhani Patel, Maarten de Vos, Ahmed Elmahy, Benoit Cuyvers, Paul Desbordes, Satesh Sehdev, Rachael A Evans, Michael D Morgan, Richard Russell, Ian Jarrold, Nannette Spain, Stephanie Taylor, David A Scott, A Toby Prevost, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Samantha Kon, Marko Topalovic, William D-C Man
{"title":"初级保健中人工智能肺活量测定诊断支持软件的验证:一项盲法诊断准确性研究。","authors":"Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe, Karolien Van Orshoven, Suhani Patel, Maarten de Vos, Ahmed Elmahy, Benoit Cuyvers, Paul Desbordes, Satesh Sehdev, Rachael A Evans, Michael D Morgan, Richard Russell, Ian Jarrold, Nannette Spain, Stephanie Taylor, David A Scott, A Toby Prevost, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Samantha Kon, Marko Topalovic, William D-C Man","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00116-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and design: </strong>The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the \"preferred\" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of artificial intelligence spirometry diagnostic support software in primary care: a blinded diagnostic accuracy study.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Sunjaya, George D Edwards, Jennifer Harvey, Karl Sylvester, Joanna Purvis, Matthew Rutter, Joanna Shakespeare, Vicky Moore, Ethaar El-Emir, Gillian Doe, Karolien Van Orshoven, Suhani Patel, Maarten de Vos, Ahmed Elmahy, Benoit Cuyvers, Paul Desbordes, Satesh Sehdev, Rachael A Evans, Michael D Morgan, Richard Russell, Ian Jarrold, Nannette Spain, Stephanie Taylor, David A Scott, A Toby Prevost, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Samantha Kon, Marko Topalovic, William D-C Man\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00116-2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective and design: </strong>The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the \\\"preferred\\\" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477482/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00116-2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00116-2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of artificial intelligence spirometry diagnostic support software in primary care: a blinded diagnostic accuracy study.
Objective and design: The objective of the present study was to assess the discriminative accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software to identify COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases from primary care spirometry. This was a diagnostic study with blinded analysis.
Methods: Retrospective hand-held spirometry data from consecutive patients attending primary care clinics in Hillingdon (London, UK) between September 2015 and March 2019 were used. The index diagnosis was the "preferred" diagnosis determined by AI software (highest probability) using supervised random-forest machine learning to interpret raw spirometry data and basic demographics. The reference diagnosis was based on the consensus of expert pulmonologists with access to primary and secondary care medical notes and results of relevant investigations. Cross-tabulation of the index test results by the results of the reference standard for COPD and other respiratory disease categories provided the main outcome measures.
Results: In this primary care spirometry dataset from 1113 patients, 543 (48.8%) had a reference diagnosis of COPD. AI preferred diagnosis detected 456, achieving a sensitivity of 84.0% (95% CI 80.6-87.0%), specificity of 86.8% (83.8-89.5%), accuracy of 85.4% (83.2-87.5%) with area under curve (AUC) of 0.914 (0.896-0.930). AI preferred diagnosis identified 187 out of 249 patients with reference diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and 59 out of 107 patients with asthma, with AUCs of 0.900 (0.880-0.916) and 0.814 (0.790-0.836), respectively.
Conclusion: AI software achieved high sensitivity and specificity in identifying COPD using spirometry and basic demographic data and may support accurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care. AI software performed less well for other chronic respiratory disease categories.
期刊介绍:
ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.