对标治疗标准和新兴基因组方法,以提高儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的诊断。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
José Vicente Gil, Gayane Avetisyan, Alberto Miralles, Sandra de Las Heras, Álvaro Díaz-González, Carolina López-Benet, María Del Cañizo, Ana Vicente, Rafael Andreu, Carolina Fuentes, José María Fernández, Eva Barragán, Esperanza Such, Marta Llop
{"title":"对标治疗标准和新兴基因组方法,以提高儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的诊断。","authors":"José Vicente Gil, Gayane Avetisyan, Alberto Miralles, Sandra de Las Heras, Álvaro Díaz-González, Carolina López-Benet, María Del Cañizo, Ana Vicente, Rafael Andreu, Carolina Fuentes, José María Fernández, Eva Barragán, Esperanza Such, Marta Llop","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03204-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The molecular characterisation of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pALL) is essential for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification. However, standard-of-care (SoC) methods have limited sensitivity and resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical utility of emerging genomic technologies-including optical genome mapping (OGM), digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (dMLPA), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and targeted next-generation sequencing (t-NGS)-in the largest cohort of pALL patients analysed to date, with 60 cases using OGM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering clinically relevant alterations identified with at least two different methods, OGM as a standalone test demonstrated superior resolution, detecting chromosomal gains and losses (51.7% vs. 35%, p = 0.0973) and gene fusions (56.7% vs. 30%, p = 0.0057), while resolving 15% of non-informative cases. Combining dMLPA and RNA-seq was the most effective approach, achieving precise classification of complex subtypes and uniquely identifying IGH rearrangements undetected by other techniques. OGM identified clinically relevant alterations in 90% of cases, and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination reached 95%, compared to 46.7% with SoC techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating these technologies into diagnostic workflows overcomes SoC limitations. OGM and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination emerge as front-line strategies, addressing pALL heterogeneity, streamlining molecular testing, and informing treatment decisions to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking standard-of-care and emerging genomic approaches to enhance diagnosis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"José Vicente Gil, Gayane Avetisyan, Alberto Miralles, Sandra de Las Heras, Álvaro Díaz-González, Carolina López-Benet, María Del Cañizo, Ana Vicente, Rafael Andreu, Carolina Fuentes, José María Fernández, Eva Barragán, Esperanza Such, Marta Llop\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-025-03204-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The molecular characterisation of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pALL) is essential for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification. However, standard-of-care (SoC) methods have limited sensitivity and resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluates the clinical utility of emerging genomic technologies-including optical genome mapping (OGM), digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (dMLPA), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and targeted next-generation sequencing (t-NGS)-in the largest cohort of pALL patients analysed to date, with 60 cases using OGM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering clinically relevant alterations identified with at least two different methods, OGM as a standalone test demonstrated superior resolution, detecting chromosomal gains and losses (51.7% vs. 35%, p = 0.0973) and gene fusions (56.7% vs. 30%, p = 0.0057), while resolving 15% of non-informative cases. Combining dMLPA and RNA-seq was the most effective approach, achieving precise classification of complex subtypes and uniquely identifying IGH rearrangements undetected by other techniques. OGM identified clinically relevant alterations in 90% of cases, and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination reached 95%, compared to 46.7% with SoC techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating these technologies into diagnostic workflows overcomes SoC limitations. OGM and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination emerge as front-line strategies, addressing pALL heterogeneity, streamlining molecular testing, and informing treatment decisions to improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03204-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03204-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(pALL)的分子特征对准确诊断和风险分层至关重要。然而,标准护理(SoC)方法的灵敏度和分辨率有限。方法:本研究评估了新兴基因组技术的临床应用,包括光学基因组定位(OGM)、数字多路连接依赖探针扩增(dMLPA)、RNA测序(RNA-seq)和靶向下一代测序(t-NGS),在迄今为止分析的最大的pALL患者队列中,有60例使用了OGM。结果:考虑到至少两种不同方法鉴定出的临床相关改变,OGM作为一种独立检测显示出更高的分辨率,检测到染色体的增益和损失(51.7%对35%,p = 0.0973)和基因融合(56.7%对30%,p = 0.0057),同时解决了15%的非信息病例。结合dMLPA和RNA-seq是最有效的方法,可以实现复杂亚型的精确分类,并独特地识别其他技术无法检测到的IGH重排。OGM在90%的病例中发现了临床相关的改变,dMLPA-RNAseq组合达到95%,而SoC技术为46.7%。结论:将这些技术集成到诊断工作流程中可以克服SoC的限制。OGM和dMLPA-RNAseq组合作为一线策略出现,解决了pALL的异质性,简化了分子检测,并为治疗决策提供了信息,以改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benchmarking standard-of-care and emerging genomic approaches to enhance diagnosis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Background: The molecular characterisation of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (pALL) is essential for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification. However, standard-of-care (SoC) methods have limited sensitivity and resolution.

Methods: This study evaluates the clinical utility of emerging genomic technologies-including optical genome mapping (OGM), digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (dMLPA), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and targeted next-generation sequencing (t-NGS)-in the largest cohort of pALL patients analysed to date, with 60 cases using OGM.

Results: Considering clinically relevant alterations identified with at least two different methods, OGM as a standalone test demonstrated superior resolution, detecting chromosomal gains and losses (51.7% vs. 35%, p = 0.0973) and gene fusions (56.7% vs. 30%, p = 0.0057), while resolving 15% of non-informative cases. Combining dMLPA and RNA-seq was the most effective approach, achieving precise classification of complex subtypes and uniquely identifying IGH rearrangements undetected by other techniques. OGM identified clinically relevant alterations in 90% of cases, and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination reached 95%, compared to 46.7% with SoC techniques.

Conclusions: Integrating these technologies into diagnostic workflows overcomes SoC limitations. OGM and the dMLPA-RNAseq combination emerge as front-line strategies, addressing pALL heterogeneity, streamlining molecular testing, and informing treatment decisions to improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信