制定可操作的质量指标和实施工具包,用于英国约克郡和亨伯地区结直肠癌围手术期阿片类药物管理:一项修改的兰德共识研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sarah Alderson, Caroline Thomas, Hannah Rossington, Emily Connearn, Simon Howell
{"title":"制定可操作的质量指标和实施工具包,用于英国约克郡和亨伯地区结直肠癌围手术期阿片类药物管理:一项修改的兰德共识研究。","authors":"Sarah Alderson, Caroline Thomas, Hannah Rossington, Emily Connearn, Simon Howell","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are global concerns about the rise in opioid prescribing. Patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk of adverse outcomes from opioid-related complications, including delayed discharge and adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term opioid use and reduced cancer-free survival. We aimed to develop a set of actionable quality indicators for opioid stewardship for patients undergoing CRC surgery, and an implementation toolkit to support professional behaviour change to improve appropriateness of perioperative opioid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A five-round modified RAND consensus process was conducted in 2021-2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>14 secondary care trusts across the UK Yorkshire and Humber region.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consultant anaesthetists and national perioperative opioid stewardship experts (expert panel) and patient and public panel.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Potential indicators were identified from a literature review, guideline search and expert panel. All potential indicators were rated on relevance and actionability (online survey, expert panel) and importance to patient care (online meeting, patient panel). A hybrid consensus meeting involving a patient representative and the expert panel discussed and rerated the indicators. An online expert survey identified potential barriers to implementation. An actionable toolkit was developed using implementation strategies and supporting resources developed where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 potential indicators were identified. All indicators remained in the process through the online survey and patient panel. After the final meeting, four indicators remained: (1) hospital trust presence of an opioid stewardship protocol; (2) inpatient functional post-operative pain assessments; (3) patient education and discharge leaflet; and (4) senior clinician review of 'strong' opioids on discharge (British National Formulary definition). The number of barriers identified ranged from 8 to 22 per indicator. 49 different implementation strategies were identified for the toolkit (range 32-45 per indicator).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified four actionable quality indicators and developed an implementation toolkit that represents consensus in defining quality of care in opioid stewardship for CRC surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 9","pages":"e092675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of actionable quality indicators and an implementation toolkit for perioperative opioid stewardship in colorectal cancer in the UK Yorkshire and Humber region: a modified RAND consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Alderson, Caroline Thomas, Hannah Rossington, Emily Connearn, Simon Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are global concerns about the rise in opioid prescribing. Patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk of adverse outcomes from opioid-related complications, including delayed discharge and adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term opioid use and reduced cancer-free survival. We aimed to develop a set of actionable quality indicators for opioid stewardship for patients undergoing CRC surgery, and an implementation toolkit to support professional behaviour change to improve appropriateness of perioperative opioid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A five-round modified RAND consensus process was conducted in 2021-2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>14 secondary care trusts across the UK Yorkshire and Humber region.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consultant anaesthetists and national perioperative opioid stewardship experts (expert panel) and patient and public panel.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Potential indicators were identified from a literature review, guideline search and expert panel. All potential indicators were rated on relevance and actionability (online survey, expert panel) and importance to patient care (online meeting, patient panel). A hybrid consensus meeting involving a patient representative and the expert panel discussed and rerated the indicators. An online expert survey identified potential barriers to implementation. An actionable toolkit was developed using implementation strategies and supporting resources developed where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73 potential indicators were identified. All indicators remained in the process through the online survey and patient panel. After the final meeting, four indicators remained: (1) hospital trust presence of an opioid stewardship protocol; (2) inpatient functional post-operative pain assessments; (3) patient education and discharge leaflet; and (4) senior clinician review of 'strong' opioids on discharge (British National Formulary definition). The number of barriers identified ranged from 8 to 22 per indicator. 49 different implementation strategies were identified for the toolkit (range 32-45 per indicator).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified four actionable quality indicators and developed an implementation toolkit that represents consensus in defining quality of care in opioid stewardship for CRC surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"e092675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092675\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阿片类药物处方的增加引起了全球的关注。接受可能治愈的结直肠癌(CRC)手术的患者面临阿片类药物相关并发症的高风险不良后果,包括延迟出院和辅助化疗,长期使用阿片类药物和减少无癌生存期。我们的目标是为接受结直肠癌手术的患者制定一套可操作的阿片类药物管理质量指标,以及一个实施工具包,以支持专业行为改变,以提高围手术期阿片类药物处方的适宜性。设计:在2021-2024年进行了五轮修改后的兰德共识过程。设置:14个二级护理信托横跨英国约克郡和亨伯地区。参与者:顾问麻醉师和国家围手术期阿片类药物管理专家(专家小组)以及患者和公众小组。干预措施:从文献综述、指南检索和专家小组中确定潜在指标。所有潜在指标都根据相关性和可操作性(在线调查,专家小组)和对患者护理的重要性(在线会议,患者小组)进行评级。由患者代表和专家小组参加的混合共识会议讨论并重新审议了指标。一项在线专家调查确定了实施的潜在障碍。利用适当情况下开发的实施战略和支持资源,开发了一个可操作的工具包。结果:鉴定出73项潜在指标。所有指标都通过在线调查和患者小组保留。在最后一次会议之后,四个指标仍然存在:(1)医院信托机构是否存在阿片类药物管理协议;(2)住院患者术后功能性疼痛评估;(3)患者教育和出院单张;(4)高级临床医生对出院时“强”阿片类药物的审查(英国国家处方集定义)。每个指标确定的障碍数从8到22不等。为工具包确定了49种不同的实施策略(每个指标范围为32-45)。结论:我们确定了四个可操作的质量指标,并开发了一个实施工具包,代表了定义CRC手术阿片类药物管理护理质量的共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of actionable quality indicators and an implementation toolkit for perioperative opioid stewardship in colorectal cancer in the UK Yorkshire and Humber region: a modified RAND consensus study.

Objectives: There are global concerns about the rise in opioid prescribing. Patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk of adverse outcomes from opioid-related complications, including delayed discharge and adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term opioid use and reduced cancer-free survival. We aimed to develop a set of actionable quality indicators for opioid stewardship for patients undergoing CRC surgery, and an implementation toolkit to support professional behaviour change to improve appropriateness of perioperative opioid prescribing.

Design: A five-round modified RAND consensus process was conducted in 2021-2024.

Setting: 14 secondary care trusts across the UK Yorkshire and Humber region.

Participants: Consultant anaesthetists and national perioperative opioid stewardship experts (expert panel) and patient and public panel.

Interventions: Potential indicators were identified from a literature review, guideline search and expert panel. All potential indicators were rated on relevance and actionability (online survey, expert panel) and importance to patient care (online meeting, patient panel). A hybrid consensus meeting involving a patient representative and the expert panel discussed and rerated the indicators. An online expert survey identified potential barriers to implementation. An actionable toolkit was developed using implementation strategies and supporting resources developed where appropriate.

Results: 73 potential indicators were identified. All indicators remained in the process through the online survey and patient panel. After the final meeting, four indicators remained: (1) hospital trust presence of an opioid stewardship protocol; (2) inpatient functional post-operative pain assessments; (3) patient education and discharge leaflet; and (4) senior clinician review of 'strong' opioids on discharge (British National Formulary definition). The number of barriers identified ranged from 8 to 22 per indicator. 49 different implementation strategies were identified for the toolkit (range 32-45 per indicator).

Conclusions: We identified four actionable quality indicators and developed an implementation toolkit that represents consensus in defining quality of care in opioid stewardship for CRC surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信