{"title":"消费者对植物奶酪的看法。","authors":"Ella Warner, Kumpol Homwongpanich, MaryAnne Drake","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Plant-based dairy alternatives have been an increasing trend among consumers, with plant-based milk being the most profitable and rapidly growing dairy alternative. Plant-based cheese (PBC), however, has recently remained static. The objectives of this study were to determine purchase motivations, consumer acceptance, and areas for improvement for Cheddar and mozzarella-style PBC. An online survey was conducted with consumers of dairy cheese (DC) and PBC (<i>n</i> = 311). Subsequently, consumer acceptance testing was conducted with both plant-based Cheddar-style cheese (<i>n</i> = 105) and plant-based mozzarella-style cheese (<i>n</i> = 117). Two days of testing were dedicated to each PBC style, consumers evaluated the shreds cold (as-is) on the first day and melted on the second day. The online survey consisted of a maximum difference (MXD) scaling, agreement questions, and an ingredient list activity. Consumer acceptance testing utilized liking and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Conceptually, flavor, texture, ingredients, and protein content were the most important attributes for PBC purchase. A short ingredient list was preferred. Dairy cheese (DC) was perceived as superior in flavor and texture, while PBC was perceived as more sustainable, more ethical, and healthier. Both products were perceived as equally nutritious. Cheesy, creamy, buttery, and soft were desirable attributes when served cold and melted for both PB styles. Undesirable attributes for both styles when evaluated cold included gritty, rubbery, artificial, and off flavor. During the melted evaluation (both styles), artificial and off flavors were undesirable. Two major pain points remain for the PBC market: flavor and texture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>Flavor and texture, both cold and hot, remain challenges for Cheddar and mozzarella-style plant-based cheeses. Understanding consumer perceptions of plant-based cheeses can aid in the development of products that meet consumer expectations and desires.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer Perception of Plant-Based Cheese\",\"authors\":\"Ella Warner, Kumpol Homwongpanich, MaryAnne Drake\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Plant-based dairy alternatives have been an increasing trend among consumers, with plant-based milk being the most profitable and rapidly growing dairy alternative. Plant-based cheese (PBC), however, has recently remained static. The objectives of this study were to determine purchase motivations, consumer acceptance, and areas for improvement for Cheddar and mozzarella-style PBC. An online survey was conducted with consumers of dairy cheese (DC) and PBC (<i>n</i> = 311). Subsequently, consumer acceptance testing was conducted with both plant-based Cheddar-style cheese (<i>n</i> = 105) and plant-based mozzarella-style cheese (<i>n</i> = 117). Two days of testing were dedicated to each PBC style, consumers evaluated the shreds cold (as-is) on the first day and melted on the second day. The online survey consisted of a maximum difference (MXD) scaling, agreement questions, and an ingredient list activity. Consumer acceptance testing utilized liking and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Conceptually, flavor, texture, ingredients, and protein content were the most important attributes for PBC purchase. A short ingredient list was preferred. Dairy cheese (DC) was perceived as superior in flavor and texture, while PBC was perceived as more sustainable, more ethical, and healthier. Both products were perceived as equally nutritious. Cheesy, creamy, buttery, and soft were desirable attributes when served cold and melted for both PB styles. Undesirable attributes for both styles when evaluated cold included gritty, rubbery, artificial, and off flavor. During the melted evaluation (both styles), artificial and off flavors were undesirable. Two major pain points remain for the PBC market: flavor and texture.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Flavor and texture, both cold and hot, remain challenges for Cheddar and mozzarella-style plant-based cheeses. Understanding consumer perceptions of plant-based cheeses can aid in the development of products that meet consumer expectations and desires.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70460\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plant-based dairy alternatives have been an increasing trend among consumers, with plant-based milk being the most profitable and rapidly growing dairy alternative. Plant-based cheese (PBC), however, has recently remained static. The objectives of this study were to determine purchase motivations, consumer acceptance, and areas for improvement for Cheddar and mozzarella-style PBC. An online survey was conducted with consumers of dairy cheese (DC) and PBC (n = 311). Subsequently, consumer acceptance testing was conducted with both plant-based Cheddar-style cheese (n = 105) and plant-based mozzarella-style cheese (n = 117). Two days of testing were dedicated to each PBC style, consumers evaluated the shreds cold (as-is) on the first day and melted on the second day. The online survey consisted of a maximum difference (MXD) scaling, agreement questions, and an ingredient list activity. Consumer acceptance testing utilized liking and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Conceptually, flavor, texture, ingredients, and protein content were the most important attributes for PBC purchase. A short ingredient list was preferred. Dairy cheese (DC) was perceived as superior in flavor and texture, while PBC was perceived as more sustainable, more ethical, and healthier. Both products were perceived as equally nutritious. Cheesy, creamy, buttery, and soft were desirable attributes when served cold and melted for both PB styles. Undesirable attributes for both styles when evaluated cold included gritty, rubbery, artificial, and off flavor. During the melted evaluation (both styles), artificial and off flavors were undesirable. Two major pain points remain for the PBC market: flavor and texture.
Practical Applications
Flavor and texture, both cold and hot, remain challenges for Cheddar and mozzarella-style plant-based cheeses. Understanding consumer perceptions of plant-based cheeses can aid in the development of products that meet consumer expectations and desires.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.