阿尔茨海默病表型中语音与语音短期记忆的分离

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shalom K Henderson, Ajay Halai, Kamen A Tsvetanov, Thomas E Cope, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病表型中语音与语音短期记忆的分离","authors":"Shalom K Henderson, Ajay Halai, Kamen A Tsvetanov, Thomas E Cope, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01856-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired phonological short-term memory is a core feature of the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), but it is not clear whether a core phonological processing deficit is also present.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked three questions: (i) beyond short-term memory impairment, do lvPPA patients have an impairment within phonology itself?; (ii) is their performance in working memory and naming reflective of this phonological impairment?; and (iii) is their repetition performance related to structural and functional differences in key language-dominant regions? We compared non-word and word repetition and short-term memory performance in patients with typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD), lvPPA per consensus criteria, and others who previously satisfied definitions of lvPPA but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (lvPPA+).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in phonological tasks of word and non-word repetition. We found very strong evidence for an effect of self-reported hearing loss on word and non-word repetition, but not multi-syllabic word/phrase repetition. A comparison of phonological versus working memory and naming tasks produced either no evidence or evidence for no correlation. Beyond the expected grey matter reductions in patients relative to controls, there was anecdotal evidence for an association between non-word repetition and functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and posterior superior temporal gyrus regions in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that, in the absence of self-reported hearing loss, patients did not exhibit impairments in tasks tapping \"pure\" phonological processing. Our results suggest that instead of having a core phonological impairment, lvPPA patients have a working memory/buffering impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling phonology from phonological short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.\",\"authors\":\"Shalom K Henderson, Ajay Halai, Kamen A Tsvetanov, Thomas E Cope, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-025-01856-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired phonological short-term memory is a core feature of the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), but it is not clear whether a core phonological processing deficit is also present.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked three questions: (i) beyond short-term memory impairment, do lvPPA patients have an impairment within phonology itself?; (ii) is their performance in working memory and naming reflective of this phonological impairment?; and (iii) is their repetition performance related to structural and functional differences in key language-dominant regions? We compared non-word and word repetition and short-term memory performance in patients with typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD), lvPPA per consensus criteria, and others who previously satisfied definitions of lvPPA but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (lvPPA+).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in phonological tasks of word and non-word repetition. We found very strong evidence for an effect of self-reported hearing loss on word and non-word repetition, but not multi-syllabic word/phrase repetition. A comparison of phonological versus working memory and naming tasks produced either no evidence or evidence for no correlation. Beyond the expected grey matter reductions in patients relative to controls, there was anecdotal evidence for an association between non-word repetition and functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and posterior superior temporal gyrus regions in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that, in the absence of self-reported hearing loss, patients did not exhibit impairments in tasks tapping \\\"pure\\\" phonological processing. Our results suggest that instead of having a core phonological impairment, lvPPA patients have a working memory/buffering impairment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01856-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01856-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:语音短期记忆受损是原发性进行性失语症(lvPPA)的核心特征,但核心语音加工缺陷是否也存在尚不清楚。方法:我们提出了三个问题:(i)除了短期记忆障碍外,lvPPA患者本身是否有语音障碍?(ii)他们在工作记忆和命名方面的表现是否反映了这种语音障碍?(iii)他们的重复表现是否与关键语言主导区域的结构和功能差异有关?我们比较了典型阿尔茨海默病(tAD)、共识标准lvPPA和其他先前满足lvPPA定义但进展为多领域认知障碍(lvPPA+)的患者的非单词和单词重复和短期记忆表现。结果:贝叶斯分析显示单词和非单词重复的语音任务没有组间差异。我们发现非常有力的证据表明,自我报告的听力损失对单词和非单词重复有影响,但对多音节单词/短语重复没有影响。语音与工作记忆和命名任务的比较要么没有证据,要么没有证据表明两者之间没有关联。除了预期患者相对于对照组的灰质减少之外,有轶事证据表明非单词重复与患者背侧运动前区和后颞上回区之间的功能连接之间存在关联。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在没有自我报告听力损失的情况下,患者在“纯”语音加工任务中没有表现出障碍。我们的研究结果表明,lvPPA患者没有核心语音障碍,而是有工作记忆/缓冲障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Disentangling phonology from phonological short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.

Disentangling phonology from phonological short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.

Disentangling phonology from phonological short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.

Disentangling phonology from phonological short-term memory in Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.

Background: Impaired phonological short-term memory is a core feature of the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), but it is not clear whether a core phonological processing deficit is also present.

Methods: We asked three questions: (i) beyond short-term memory impairment, do lvPPA patients have an impairment within phonology itself?; (ii) is their performance in working memory and naming reflective of this phonological impairment?; and (iii) is their repetition performance related to structural and functional differences in key language-dominant regions? We compared non-word and word repetition and short-term memory performance in patients with typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD), lvPPA per consensus criteria, and others who previously satisfied definitions of lvPPA but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (lvPPA+).

Results: Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in phonological tasks of word and non-word repetition. We found very strong evidence for an effect of self-reported hearing loss on word and non-word repetition, but not multi-syllabic word/phrase repetition. A comparison of phonological versus working memory and naming tasks produced either no evidence or evidence for no correlation. Beyond the expected grey matter reductions in patients relative to controls, there was anecdotal evidence for an association between non-word repetition and functional connectivity between dorsal premotor and posterior superior temporal gyrus regions in patients.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that, in the absence of self-reported hearing loss, patients did not exhibit impairments in tasks tapping "pure" phonological processing. Our results suggest that instead of having a core phonological impairment, lvPPA patients have a working memory/buffering impairment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信