对家庭性别“老”和“大胆”操作的回应

IF 1.9 3区社会学 Q1 LAW

Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1111/jols.12546

MARIAM KAMUNYU

{"title":"对家庭性别“老”和“大胆”操作的回应","authors":"MARIAM KAMUNYU","doi":"10.1111/jols.12546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is written as a response to Flora Renz's ‘Gender (de)certification and the home: A new focus for feminist legal scholarship’? Renz's paper offers a thought-provoking critique of the contemporary role of gender categories within the home. This response is inspired by Renz's proposition that feminist legal scholarship has neglected the home as a site of gendered dynamics in regard to gender categories, and further that gender functions subtly and invisibly in the home. Drawing on a feminist legal analysis, this response offers an alternative premise that gender categories in the home operate explicitly and visibly, with material and ideological consequences for systemic inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"52 S1","pages":"S116-S120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A response on the ‘old’ and ‘bold’ operation of gender at home\",\"authors\":\"MARIAM KAMUNYU\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jols.12546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article is written as a response to Flora Renz's ‘Gender (de)certification and the home: A new focus for feminist legal scholarship’? Renz's paper offers a thought-provoking critique of the contemporary role of gender categories within the home. This response is inspired by Renz's proposition that feminist legal scholarship has neglected the home as a site of gendered dynamics in regard to gender categories, and further that gender functions subtly and invisibly in the home. Drawing on a feminist legal analysis, this response offers an alternative premise that gender categories in the home operate explicitly and visibly, with material and ideological consequences for systemic inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"52 S1\",\"pages\":\"S116-S120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12546\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对Flora Renz的《性别（de）认证与家庭：女权主义法律研究的新焦点》的回应。Renz的论文对性别类别在家庭中的当代角色提出了发人深省的批评。这种回应的灵感来自于Renz的主张，即女权主义法律学术忽视了家庭作为性别分类中性别动态的场所，而且性别在家庭中微妙而无形地起着作用。根据女权主义法律分析，这种回应提供了另一种前提，即家庭中的性别类别明确而明显地运作，对系统性不平等产生物质和意识形态后果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

A response on the ‘old’ and ‘bold’ operation of gender at home

查看原文本刊更多论文

A response on the ‘old’ and ‘bold’ operation of gender at home

This article is written as a response to Flora Renz's ‘Gender (de)certification and the home: A new focus for feminist legal scholarship’? Renz's paper offers a thought-provoking critique of the contemporary role of gender categories within the home. This response is inspired by Renz's proposition that feminist legal scholarship has neglected the home as a site of gendered dynamics in regard to gender categories, and further that gender functions subtly and invisibly in the home. Drawing on a feminist legal analysis, this response offers an alternative premise that gender categories in the home operate explicitly and visibly, with material and ideological consequences for systemic inequalities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Law and Society Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.