Matthew A. Halanski, Cameron Jeffers, Yousuf Abubakr, Minhao Zhou, Brittney Kokinos, Max Twedt, David Bennett, Susan Hamman, Thomas Crenshaw, Grace D. O'Connell, Hani Haider
{"title":"通过骨膜切除和固定长度畸形过度矫正来调节椎体生长:计算和体内试验研究","authors":"Matthew A. Halanski, Cameron Jeffers, Yousuf Abubakr, Minhao Zhou, Brittney Kokinos, Max Twedt, David Bennett, Susan Hamman, Thomas Crenshaw, Grace D. O'Connell, Hani Haider","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless surgical technique for correcting spinal deformities through asymmetric growth inhibition. Standard VBT often relies on intraoperative overcorrection with an anterior center of rotation, which may decrease disc height and inhibit vertebral growth. Strategies that promote, rather than inhibit, growth could expand the vertebral growth modulation toolkit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Determine how the center of rotation location during overcorrection influences vertebral growth, and to evaluate the feasibility of growth-promoting techniques, including anterior vertebral periosteal transection and a novel uniplanar, unidirectional, length-stable posterior implant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Validated finite element model (FEM) simulated anterior versus posterior centers of rotation, assessing effects on disc height, physeal stress, and sagittal vertebral growth. Six swine underwent anterior periosteal transection, with growth rates measured against adjacent vertebrae. In a kyphotic swine model, a posterior fixed-length implant was applied across the most kyphotic disc space, shifting the center of rotation posteriorly; growth modulation was compared to non-operative controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Computational analysis and large animal study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>FEM predicted that a posterior (convex) center of rotation increased disc height, redistributed physeal stress to promote growth, and improved deformity correction, whereas an anterior center of rotation decreased disc height and inhibited growth. Periosteal transection did not accelerate vertebral growth (170 ± 19 μm/day control vs. 155 ± 25 μm/day treated; <i>p</i> = 0.054). In contrast, the posterior implant achieved overcorrection and induced corrective % appositional metaphyseal growth modulation (+24% ± 10% vs. −11% ± 13% in controls; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Periosteal resection/transection did not reliably enhance vertebral growth. Shifting the corrective center of rotation posteriorly using a fixed-length, uniplanar device preserved disc height and promoted corrective growth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Posterior, length-stable implants may serve as a viable alternative to standard VBT, especially when conventional techniques fail to shift the center of rotation away from the deformity's concavity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vertebral Growth Modulation Through Periosteal Resection and Fixed Length Deformity Overcorrection: Computational and In Vivo Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A. Halanski, Cameron Jeffers, Yousuf Abubakr, Minhao Zhou, Brittney Kokinos, Max Twedt, David Bennett, Susan Hamman, Thomas Crenshaw, Grace D. O'Connell, Hani Haider\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsp2.70121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless surgical technique for correcting spinal deformities through asymmetric growth inhibition. Standard VBT often relies on intraoperative overcorrection with an anterior center of rotation, which may decrease disc height and inhibit vertebral growth. Strategies that promote, rather than inhibit, growth could expand the vertebral growth modulation toolkit.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Determine how the center of rotation location during overcorrection influences vertebral growth, and to evaluate the feasibility of growth-promoting techniques, including anterior vertebral periosteal transection and a novel uniplanar, unidirectional, length-stable posterior implant.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Validated finite element model (FEM) simulated anterior versus posterior centers of rotation, assessing effects on disc height, physeal stress, and sagittal vertebral growth. Six swine underwent anterior periosteal transection, with growth rates measured against adjacent vertebrae. In a kyphotic swine model, a posterior fixed-length implant was applied across the most kyphotic disc space, shifting the center of rotation posteriorly; growth modulation was compared to non-operative controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Computational analysis and large animal study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>FEM predicted that a posterior (convex) center of rotation increased disc height, redistributed physeal stress to promote growth, and improved deformity correction, whereas an anterior center of rotation decreased disc height and inhibited growth. Periosteal transection did not accelerate vertebral growth (170 ± 19 μm/day control vs. 155 ± 25 μm/day treated; <i>p</i> = 0.054). In contrast, the posterior implant achieved overcorrection and induced corrective % appositional metaphyseal growth modulation (+24% ± 10% vs. −11% ± 13% in controls; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Periosteal resection/transection did not reliably enhance vertebral growth. Shifting the corrective center of rotation posteriorly using a fixed-length, uniplanar device preserved disc height and promoted corrective growth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Posterior, length-stable implants may serve as a viable alternative to standard VBT, especially when conventional techniques fail to shift the center of rotation away from the deformity's concavity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOR Spine\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsp2.70121\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOR Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
椎体系扎术(VBT)是一种通过不对称生长抑制矫正脊柱畸形的无融合手术技术。标准的VBT通常依赖于术中过度矫正和前旋转中心,这可能会降低椎间盘高度并抑制椎体生长。促进而不是抑制生长的策略可以扩展椎体生长调节工具。目的确定过度矫正过程中旋转中心的位置如何影响椎体生长,并评估生长促进技术的可行性,包括椎体前段骨膜横断和一种新型的单平面、单向、长度稳定的后路种植体。方法验证有限元模型(FEM)模拟前后旋转中心,评估对椎间盘高度、物理应力和矢状椎体生长的影响。6头猪接受了前骨膜横断术,测量了相邻椎骨的生长速率。在猪后凸模型中,将后路固定长度的植入物应用于最后凸的椎间盘间隙,将旋转中心向后移动;生长调节与非手术对照组比较。研究设计计算分析和大型动物研究。结果FEM预测后(凸)旋转中心增加椎间盘高度,重新分配物理应力以促进生长,并改善畸形矫正,而前旋转中心降低椎间盘高度并抑制生长。骨膜横断不加速椎体生长(对照组为170±19 μm/天,对照组为155±25 μm/天;p = 0.054)。相比之下,后路种植体实现了过度矫正和诱导矫正%相对干骺端生长调节(对照组为+24%±10% vs - 11%±13%;p = 0.001)。结论骨膜切除/横断不能可靠地促进椎体生长。使用固定长度的单平面装置向后移动矫正中心旋转,保持椎间盘高度并促进矫正生长。临床意义后路,长度稳定的植入物可以作为标准VBT的可行替代方案,特别是当传统技术无法将旋转中心从畸形的凹面移开时。
Vertebral Growth Modulation Through Periosteal Resection and Fixed Length Deformity Overcorrection: Computational and In Vivo Pilot Study
Background
Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless surgical technique for correcting spinal deformities through asymmetric growth inhibition. Standard VBT often relies on intraoperative overcorrection with an anterior center of rotation, which may decrease disc height and inhibit vertebral growth. Strategies that promote, rather than inhibit, growth could expand the vertebral growth modulation toolkit.
Purpose
Determine how the center of rotation location during overcorrection influences vertebral growth, and to evaluate the feasibility of growth-promoting techniques, including anterior vertebral periosteal transection and a novel uniplanar, unidirectional, length-stable posterior implant.
Methods
Validated finite element model (FEM) simulated anterior versus posterior centers of rotation, assessing effects on disc height, physeal stress, and sagittal vertebral growth. Six swine underwent anterior periosteal transection, with growth rates measured against adjacent vertebrae. In a kyphotic swine model, a posterior fixed-length implant was applied across the most kyphotic disc space, shifting the center of rotation posteriorly; growth modulation was compared to non-operative controls.
Study Design
Computational analysis and large animal study.
Results
FEM predicted that a posterior (convex) center of rotation increased disc height, redistributed physeal stress to promote growth, and improved deformity correction, whereas an anterior center of rotation decreased disc height and inhibited growth. Periosteal transection did not accelerate vertebral growth (170 ± 19 μm/day control vs. 155 ± 25 μm/day treated; p = 0.054). In contrast, the posterior implant achieved overcorrection and induced corrective % appositional metaphyseal growth modulation (+24% ± 10% vs. −11% ± 13% in controls; p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Periosteal resection/transection did not reliably enhance vertebral growth. Shifting the corrective center of rotation posteriorly using a fixed-length, uniplanar device preserved disc height and promoted corrective growth.
Clinical Significance
Posterior, length-stable implants may serve as a viable alternative to standard VBT, especially when conventional techniques fail to shift the center of rotation away from the deformity's concavity.