{"title":"典型岩土非连续变形分析显式公式中的阻尼模式适应性和基准","authors":"Qinglong Deng, Fei Zheng, Yu‐Yong Jiao, Zhi Li","doi":"10.1002/nag.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appropriate choice of both damping mode and the associated damping coefficient significantly influence the stability, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation results for geotechnical problems. However, in numerical analysis with explicit discontinuous deformation analysis (EDDA), appropriate damping settings for different geotechnical scenarios are rarely discussed. To seek optimized damping in EDDA for various scenarios, four types of damping, including viscous damping, contact damping, unbalanced force damping, and Rayleigh damping, are incorporated in the EDDA framework. The performance of these four types of damping for basic and multi‐block systems is compared through three representative scenarios, including quasi‐static contact, collision, and wave propagation. This study verified the adaptability of the four damping models in certain geotechnical scenarios and provided recommendations for mode selection and parameters setting based on findings from the benchmarking tests. This study on damping adaptability facilitates the application of EDDA in geotechnical problems towards a more accurate and more efficient simulation.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damping Mode Adaptability and Benchmarks in Explicit Formulation of Discontinuous Deformation Analysis for Typical Geotechnical Scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Qinglong Deng, Fei Zheng, Yu‐Yong Jiao, Zhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.70096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Appropriate choice of both damping mode and the associated damping coefficient significantly influence the stability, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation results for geotechnical problems. However, in numerical analysis with explicit discontinuous deformation analysis (EDDA), appropriate damping settings for different geotechnical scenarios are rarely discussed. To seek optimized damping in EDDA for various scenarios, four types of damping, including viscous damping, contact damping, unbalanced force damping, and Rayleigh damping, are incorporated in the EDDA framework. The performance of these four types of damping for basic and multi‐block systems is compared through three representative scenarios, including quasi‐static contact, collision, and wave propagation. This study verified the adaptability of the four damping models in certain geotechnical scenarios and provided recommendations for mode selection and parameters setting based on findings from the benchmarking tests. This study on damping adaptability facilitates the application of EDDA in geotechnical problems towards a more accurate and more efficient simulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70096\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Damping Mode Adaptability and Benchmarks in Explicit Formulation of Discontinuous Deformation Analysis for Typical Geotechnical Scenarios
Appropriate choice of both damping mode and the associated damping coefficient significantly influence the stability, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation results for geotechnical problems. However, in numerical analysis with explicit discontinuous deformation analysis (EDDA), appropriate damping settings for different geotechnical scenarios are rarely discussed. To seek optimized damping in EDDA for various scenarios, four types of damping, including viscous damping, contact damping, unbalanced force damping, and Rayleigh damping, are incorporated in the EDDA framework. The performance of these four types of damping for basic and multi‐block systems is compared through three representative scenarios, including quasi‐static contact, collision, and wave propagation. This study verified the adaptability of the four damping models in certain geotechnical scenarios and provided recommendations for mode selection and parameters setting based on findings from the benchmarking tests. This study on damping adaptability facilitates the application of EDDA in geotechnical problems towards a more accurate and more efficient simulation.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.