预注册护士为经历自杀困扰的个人提供安全护理的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Renee Molloy,Brent Hayward,Samantha Scott,Alison Hansen,Adam Searby
{"title":"预注册护士为经历自杀困扰的个人提供安全护理的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。","authors":"Renee Molloy,Brent Hayward,Samantha Scott,Alison Hansen,Adam Searby","doi":"10.1111/jan.70274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\r\nTo identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nScoping review.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nThe Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nStudies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nNurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nAddressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nWhat problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nPRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT\r\nThis study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Enablers to Pre-Registration Nurses Providing Safe Care for Individuals Experiencing Suicidal Distress: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Renee Molloy,Brent Hayward,Samantha Scott,Alison Hansen,Adam Searby\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\r\\nTo identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nScoping review.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA SOURCES\\r\\nThe Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nStudies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nNurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\\r\\nAddressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.\\r\\n\\r\\nIMPACT\\r\\nWhat problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.\\r\\n\\r\\nREPORTING METHOD\\r\\nPRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT\\r\\nThis study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过绘制已知的障碍和促进因素来确定研究差距,以预先注册护理学生,识别医疗保健消费者的自杀困扰迹象,并提供明确的支持途径。DESIGNScoping审查。方法本综述采用Arksey和O'Malley(2005)的五阶段框架以及Levec等人(2010)对该框架的扩展。数据来源检索完整和Ovid MEDLINE数据库中的护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL),以确定相关文章、关键词和搜索词,为CINAHL的完整搜索策略提供信息。该搜索策略随后适用于Scopus、PsychInfo、Emcare、Medline和ERIC,于2024年11月进行了搜索。结果符合纳入条件的研究(N = 28)来自14个国家;大多数(53.5%,n = 15)采用定量设计,11(39.3%)采用定性设计,2(7.1%)采用混合方法设计。从范围审查中发现的障碍包括对自杀的认识水平较低,耻辱感阻止学生评估自杀意念并采取行动,以及缺乏对表达自杀倾向的医疗保健消费者提供护理的信心。促进因素包括生活经历、接触表达自杀意念的个体、教育、模拟和角色扮演。这篇综述也有助于现有文献关于护理与现有自杀预防框架的关系,并建议修订这些框架,以解决工作人员的态度和信念,以及生活和生活经验。结论护士是评估和应对医疗保健消费者自杀行为的理想人选,应在预登记研究中开始准备工作。我们的范围审查表明,需要进一步的研究工作来解决与表达自杀倾向的医疗保健消费者合作的障碍,并增强提供安全护理的促成因素。对职业和/或病人护理的启示解决障碍和使能的预先注册护理学生提供安全护理的保健消费者表达自杀是至关重要的。需要进一步的研究来解决这些障碍,并加强在这一范围审查中确定的推动因素。这项研究解决了什么问题?本综述总结了关于注册前学生与表达自杀倾向的医疗保健消费者一起工作的能力的文献,确定了障碍和促进因素。主要发现是什么?障碍包括对自杀的了解不足、耻辱、恐惧以及在与表达自杀倾向的医疗保健消费者合作时缺乏信心。促成因素包括生活经验、接触医疗保健消费者表达自杀倾向的临床环境、模拟和教育。这项研究将对谁和在哪里产生影响?该研究将对预注册护理学位的提供者产生影响,其中包括解决自杀问题的内容,并暴露于个人表达自杀意念的环境中,以改善自杀评估的态度和知识。报告方法prisma检查清单用于范围审查。患者或公众参与本研究的设计、实施和报告均未涉及患者或公众的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and Enablers to Pre-Registration Nurses Providing Safe Care for Individuals Experiencing Suicidal Distress: A Scoping Review.
AIMS To identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework. DATA SOURCES The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024. RESULTS Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience. CONCLUSION Nurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Addressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review. IMPACT What problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment. REPORTING METHOD PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews. PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信