Wienke G W Boerma, Peter Groenewegen, Rob Timans, Sarah Burgmann, Rosa Suñol, Pili Illarramendi Charovsky, Jose M Valderas
{"title":"测量初级保健的力量:发展一个新的结构指标体系的力量- SiSPC。","authors":"Wienke G W Boerma, Peter Groenewegen, Rob Timans, Sarah Burgmann, Rosa Suñol, Pili Illarramendi Charovsky, Jose M Valderas","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625100509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.\",\"authors\":\"Wienke G W Boerma, Peter Groenewegen, Rob Timans, Sarah Burgmann, Rosa Suñol, Pili Illarramendi Charovsky, Jose M Valderas\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423625100509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"e85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625100509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring the strength of primary care: development of a new system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care - SiSPC.
Aim: The aim of this study was to develop an up-to-date system of Structural Indicators for the Strength of Primary Care (SiSPC) to enable comparisons of primary care systems across countries.
Background: Indicators are needed for international research into the development of primary care and to support countries in monitoring improvements in access, responsiveness and efficiency of their primary care services. International comparisons with use of identical indicators for the strength of primary care offer policymakers opportunities to learn lessons from abroad.
Methods: Our point of departure was the Primary Health Care Activity Monitor Europe (PHAMEU), that effectively measured the strength of primary care at the beginning of this century. We went through the following steps: (1) Reduction, refining and tuning of the PHAMEU indicator system (2) comparison with the European Primary Health Care, Impact, Performance and Capacity Tool (PHC-IMPACT) (3) addition of topics from other frameworks (4) identification of topical issues from the literature. The resulting draft indicator system was discussed at meetings and received feedback from experts from 25 countries.
Findings: SiSPC consists of three care-related domains: Structure of Primary Care, Systemic Aspects of Facility Management and Systemic Aspects of Care Delivery. SiSPC also contains a domain on the Context of Primary Care. Care processes that vary between care providers, were not included as a domain at the system level.