Joshua T Bram, Patrick P Nian, Christopher J Williams, Olivia C Tracey, David M Scher, John S Blanco, Emily R Dodwell, Shevaun M Doyle
{"title":"较低的儿童机会指数和公共保险与减少产前矫形评估和特发性内翻足的轻微治疗延迟有关。","authors":"Joshua T Bram, Patrick P Nian, Christopher J Williams, Olivia C Tracey, David M Scher, John S Blanco, Emily R Dodwell, Shevaun M Doyle","doi":"10.1177/18632521251367969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic clubfoot is a congenital disorder necessitating time-sensitive treatment. Delayed application of the Ponseti method may result in poorer outcomes. Adverse social determinants of health, as measured with the Childhood Opportunity Index version 3.0, hinder access to care. This study aimed to determine the association between Childhood Opportunity Index, insurance status, and treatment disparities for patients with idiopathic clubfoot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent Ponseti treatment at an urban tertiary care orthopedic hospital between October 2004 and September 2022. Patients presenting for care before 6 months of age and with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. A threshold Childhood Opportunity Index value of 60.0 categorized patients into low (<60.0) and high (≥60.0) cohorts. Clinical and treatment/outcome variables were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients (mean follow-up 5.1 ± 2.5 years) merited inclusion: 31 (20%) with Childhood Opportunity Index <60 and 125 (80%) with Childhood Opportunity Index ≥60. Patients with low Childhood Opportunity Index presented at older ages (18 ± 23 versus 11 ± 10 days, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and had fewer prenatal orthopedic evaluations (42% versus 64%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Recurrence and necessity for further treatment were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients with public insurance presented at older ages (28 ± 31 versus 10 ± 9 days, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and were less likely to undergo prenatal consultation (13% versus 65%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Black/Hispanic patients were more likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-35.4, <i>p</i> = 0.03), whereas patients who had a prenatal orthopedic evaluation were less likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with idiopathic clubfoot and low Childhood Opportunity Index/public insurance experienced delayed presentation to care and fewer prenatal orthopedic consultations. However, low Childhood Opportunity Index and public insurance status were not associated with adverse treatment outcomes. Clubfoot specialists remain a critical component of the multidisciplinary prenatal team, as orthopedic consultations served as a protective factor against recurrence. These findings contribute to the existing literature by highlighting discrepancies in the care for patients with adverse social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":56060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"18632521251367969"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower Child Opportunity Index and public insurance are associated with decreased prenatal orthopedic evaluation and minor treatment delays for idiopathic clubfoot.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua T Bram, Patrick P Nian, Christopher J Williams, Olivia C Tracey, David M Scher, John S Blanco, Emily R Dodwell, Shevaun M Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521251367969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic clubfoot is a congenital disorder necessitating time-sensitive treatment. Delayed application of the Ponseti method may result in poorer outcomes. Adverse social determinants of health, as measured with the Childhood Opportunity Index version 3.0, hinder access to care. This study aimed to determine the association between Childhood Opportunity Index, insurance status, and treatment disparities for patients with idiopathic clubfoot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent Ponseti treatment at an urban tertiary care orthopedic hospital between October 2004 and September 2022. Patients presenting for care before 6 months of age and with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. A threshold Childhood Opportunity Index value of 60.0 categorized patients into low (<60.0) and high (≥60.0) cohorts. Clinical and treatment/outcome variables were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients (mean follow-up 5.1 ± 2.5 years) merited inclusion: 31 (20%) with Childhood Opportunity Index <60 and 125 (80%) with Childhood Opportunity Index ≥60. Patients with low Childhood Opportunity Index presented at older ages (18 ± 23 versus 11 ± 10 days, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and had fewer prenatal orthopedic evaluations (42% versus 64%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Recurrence and necessity for further treatment were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients with public insurance presented at older ages (28 ± 31 versus 10 ± 9 days, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and were less likely to undergo prenatal consultation (13% versus 65%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Black/Hispanic patients were more likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-35.4, <i>p</i> = 0.03), whereas patients who had a prenatal orthopedic evaluation were less likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, <i>p</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with idiopathic clubfoot and low Childhood Opportunity Index/public insurance experienced delayed presentation to care and fewer prenatal orthopedic consultations. However, low Childhood Opportunity Index and public insurance status were not associated with adverse treatment outcomes. Clubfoot specialists remain a critical component of the multidisciplinary prenatal team, as orthopedic consultations served as a protective factor against recurrence. These findings contribute to the existing literature by highlighting discrepancies in the care for patients with adverse social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18632521251367969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251367969\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521251367969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:特发性内翻足是一种先天性疾病,需要及时治疗。延迟应用Ponseti方法可能导致较差的结果。以儿童机会指数3.0版衡量,健康的不利社会决定因素阻碍了获得保健。本研究旨在确定特发性内翻足患者的儿童机会指数、保险状况和治疗差异之间的关系。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2004年10月至2022年9月在一家城市三级骨科医院接受庞塞蒂治疗的特发性内翻足患者。6个月前就诊且至少随访2年的患者纳入研究。儿童机会指数的阈值为60.0,将患者分为低(结果:156例患者(平均随访5.1±2.5年)值得纳入:31例(20%)儿童机会指数p = 0.03)和较少的产前矫形评估(42%对64%,p = 0.03)。复发率和进一步治疗的必要性相似(p < 0.05)。公共保险患者出现的年龄较大(28±31天和10±9天,p p p = 0.03),而产前矫形评估的患者复发的可能性较小(优势比0.3,95%可信区间0.1-0.9,p = 0.03)。结论:特发性内翻足和低儿童机会指数/公共保险的患者就诊延迟,产前骨科咨询较少。然而,低儿童机会指数和公共保险状况与不良治疗结果无关。畸形足专家仍然是多学科产前团队的重要组成部分,因为矫形咨询是防止复发的保护因素。这些发现通过强调对具有不利健康社会决定因素的患者的护理差异,有助于现有文献。证据等级:三级。
Lower Child Opportunity Index and public insurance are associated with decreased prenatal orthopedic evaluation and minor treatment delays for idiopathic clubfoot.
Background: Idiopathic clubfoot is a congenital disorder necessitating time-sensitive treatment. Delayed application of the Ponseti method may result in poorer outcomes. Adverse social determinants of health, as measured with the Childhood Opportunity Index version 3.0, hinder access to care. This study aimed to determine the association between Childhood Opportunity Index, insurance status, and treatment disparities for patients with idiopathic clubfoot.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent Ponseti treatment at an urban tertiary care orthopedic hospital between October 2004 and September 2022. Patients presenting for care before 6 months of age and with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. A threshold Childhood Opportunity Index value of 60.0 categorized patients into low (<60.0) and high (≥60.0) cohorts. Clinical and treatment/outcome variables were compared.
Results: A total of 156 patients (mean follow-up 5.1 ± 2.5 years) merited inclusion: 31 (20%) with Childhood Opportunity Index <60 and 125 (80%) with Childhood Opportunity Index ≥60. Patients with low Childhood Opportunity Index presented at older ages (18 ± 23 versus 11 ± 10 days, p = 0.03) and had fewer prenatal orthopedic evaluations (42% versus 64%, p = 0.03). Recurrence and necessity for further treatment were similar (p > 0.05). Patients with public insurance presented at older ages (28 ± 31 versus 10 ± 9 days, p < 0.01) and were less likely to undergo prenatal consultation (13% versus 65%, p < 0.01). Black/Hispanic patients were more likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 6.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-35.4, p = 0.03), whereas patients who had a prenatal orthopedic evaluation were less likely to experience a recurrence (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Patients with idiopathic clubfoot and low Childhood Opportunity Index/public insurance experienced delayed presentation to care and fewer prenatal orthopedic consultations. However, low Childhood Opportunity Index and public insurance status were not associated with adverse treatment outcomes. Clubfoot specialists remain a critical component of the multidisciplinary prenatal team, as orthopedic consultations served as a protective factor against recurrence. These findings contribute to the existing literature by highlighting discrepancies in the care for patients with adverse social determinants of health.
期刊介绍:
Aims & Scope
The Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics is the official journal of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) and is published by The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
It provides a forum for the advancement of the knowledge and education in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology across geographical borders. It advocates an increased worldwide involvement in preventing and treating musculoskeletal diseases in children and adolescents.
The journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles that focus on clinical practice, diagnosis and treatment of disorders unique to paediatric orthopaedics, as well as on basic and applied research. It aims to help physicians stay abreast of the latest and ever-changing developments in the field of paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology.
The journal welcomes original contributions submitted exclusively for review to the journal. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will publish one print issue each year to coincide with the EPOS Annual Congress, featuring the meeting’s abstracts.