同时局部治疗延长了替本他福在转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中的临床获益。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf323
Tristan L Lim, Kamaneh Montazeri, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, Antoine Desilets, Rino Seedor, Marlana Orloff, Takami Sato, Michael Caplan, Mariam El-Ashmawy, Benjamin Izar, Shaheer Khan, Inderjit Mehmi, Aleigha Lawless, Theodore S Hong, Omid Hamid, Richard D Carvajal, Alexander Shoushtari, Ryan J Sullivan
{"title":"同时局部治疗延长了替本他福在转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中的临床获益。","authors":"Tristan L Lim, Kamaneh Montazeri, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, Antoine Desilets, Rino Seedor, Marlana Orloff, Takami Sato, Michael Caplan, Mariam El-Ashmawy, Benjamin Izar, Shaheer Khan, Inderjit Mehmi, Aleigha Lawless, Theodore S Hong, Omid Hamid, Richard D Carvajal, Alexander Shoushtari, Ryan J Sullivan","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tebentafusp has significantly improved overall survival in HLA-A*02:01+ metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients even in those with a best objective response of progressive disease. Thus, strategies to maintain tebentafusp therapy are critical. Here, we examine the efficacy and safety of adding concurrent local therapy (CLT) to tebentafusp upon radiological progression with tebentafusp alone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included mUM patients treated with tebentafusp and CLT, consisting of extrahepatic soft tissue irradiation and liver-directed therapies (LDTs). Efficacy of target and nontarget sites were assessed per RECIST version 1.1. PFS with tebentafusp alone (PFS1) was compared to that after adding CLTs to tebentafusp upon progression (PFS1+PFS2). ctDNA responses were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 eligible patients, 21 (70%) received concurrent LDT, 7 (23%) had extrahepatic irradiation, and 2 (7%) had both. The objective response rate (ORR) was 12% (95% CI, 3-32) for tebentafusp alone and 28% (95% CI, 14-47) after adding CLTs. The disease-control rate with tebentafusp alone was 44% (95% CI, 25-65) versus 63% (95% CI, 44-78) after CLT. Median PFS1 was 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.4), while median PFS1+PFS2 was 14.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-NA). CLT thereby allowed treatment beyond progression with tebentafusp for approximately 9 months. Two patients (66%) had decreased ctDNA with tebentafusp alone, while four (100%) had decreased ctDNA after CLT. There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicities from tebentafusp with CLT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CLT with tebentafusp was well-tolerated, extending the duration of tebentafusp benefit in a highly selected mUM population. This merits further studies to assess clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent local therapy extends clinical benefit of tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tristan L Lim, Kamaneh Montazeri, Eric Wehrenberg-Klee, Antoine Desilets, Rino Seedor, Marlana Orloff, Takami Sato, Michael Caplan, Mariam El-Ashmawy, Benjamin Izar, Shaheer Khan, Inderjit Mehmi, Aleigha Lawless, Theodore S Hong, Omid Hamid, Richard D Carvajal, Alexander Shoushtari, Ryan J Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tebentafusp has significantly improved overall survival in HLA-A*02:01+ metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients even in those with a best objective response of progressive disease. Thus, strategies to maintain tebentafusp therapy are critical. Here, we examine the efficacy and safety of adding concurrent local therapy (CLT) to tebentafusp upon radiological progression with tebentafusp alone.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included mUM patients treated with tebentafusp and CLT, consisting of extrahepatic soft tissue irradiation and liver-directed therapies (LDTs). Efficacy of target and nontarget sites were assessed per RECIST version 1.1. PFS with tebentafusp alone (PFS1) was compared to that after adding CLTs to tebentafusp upon progression (PFS1+PFS2). ctDNA responses were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 30 eligible patients, 21 (70%) received concurrent LDT, 7 (23%) had extrahepatic irradiation, and 2 (7%) had both. The objective response rate (ORR) was 12% (95% CI, 3-32) for tebentafusp alone and 28% (95% CI, 14-47) after adding CLTs. The disease-control rate with tebentafusp alone was 44% (95% CI, 25-65) versus 63% (95% CI, 44-78) after CLT. Median PFS1 was 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.4), while median PFS1+PFS2 was 14.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-NA). CLT thereby allowed treatment beyond progression with tebentafusp for approximately 9 months. Two patients (66%) had decreased ctDNA with tebentafusp alone, while four (100%) had decreased ctDNA after CLT. There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicities from tebentafusp with CLT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CLT with tebentafusp was well-tolerated, extending the duration of tebentafusp benefit in a highly selected mUM population. This merits further studies to assess clinical utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Tebentafusp显著提高了HLA-A*02:01+转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤(mUM)患者的总生存率,即使是那些对进展性疾病有最佳客观反应的患者。因此,维持本他福治疗的策略至关重要。在这里,我们研究了在单独使用tebentafusp的放射学进展后,在tebentafusp中添加同步局部治疗(CLT)的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了接受tebentafusp和CLT治疗的mUM患者,CLT包括肝外软组织照射和肝定向治疗(LDTs)。根据RECIST 1.1版评估靶点和非靶点的疗效。将单独使用tebentafusp的PFS (PFS1)与在进展时将clt加入tebentafusp后的PFS (PFS1+PFS2)进行比较。探讨ctDNA反应。结果:在30例符合条件的患者中,21例(70%)同时接受了LDT, 7例(23%)接受了肝外照射,2例(7%)同时接受了肝外照射。单独使用替本他福普的客观缓解率(ORR)为12% (95% CI, 3-32),添加clt后的客观缓解率为28% (95% CI, 14-47)。单独使用tebentafusp的疾病控制率为44% (95% CI, 25-65),而CLT后的疾病控制率为63% (95% CI, 44-78)。中位PFS1为5.8个月(95% CI, 2.8-13.4),而中位PFS1+PFS2为14.8个月(95% CI, 9.2 na)。因此,CLT允许使用tebentafusp治疗超过进展约9个月。两名患者(66%)单独使用tebentafusp后ctDNA下降,而四名患者(100%)在CLT后ctDNA下降。在CLT治疗中,没有因替他福的毒性而中断治疗。结论:特本他福的CLT耐受性良好,在高度选择的mUM人群中延长了特本他福的获益时间。这值得进一步研究以评估临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent local therapy extends clinical benefit of tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma patients.

Background: Tebentafusp has significantly improved overall survival in HLA-A*02:01+ metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients even in those with a best objective response of progressive disease. Thus, strategies to maintain tebentafusp therapy are critical. Here, we examine the efficacy and safety of adding concurrent local therapy (CLT) to tebentafusp upon radiological progression with tebentafusp alone.

Patients and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included mUM patients treated with tebentafusp and CLT, consisting of extrahepatic soft tissue irradiation and liver-directed therapies (LDTs). Efficacy of target and nontarget sites were assessed per RECIST version 1.1. PFS with tebentafusp alone (PFS1) was compared to that after adding CLTs to tebentafusp upon progression (PFS1+PFS2). ctDNA responses were explored.

Results: Of the 30 eligible patients, 21 (70%) received concurrent LDT, 7 (23%) had extrahepatic irradiation, and 2 (7%) had both. The objective response rate (ORR) was 12% (95% CI, 3-32) for tebentafusp alone and 28% (95% CI, 14-47) after adding CLTs. The disease-control rate with tebentafusp alone was 44% (95% CI, 25-65) versus 63% (95% CI, 44-78) after CLT. Median PFS1 was 5.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.4), while median PFS1+PFS2 was 14.8 months (95% CI, 9.2-NA). CLT thereby allowed treatment beyond progression with tebentafusp for approximately 9 months. Two patients (66%) had decreased ctDNA with tebentafusp alone, while four (100%) had decreased ctDNA after CLT. There were no treatment discontinuations due to toxicities from tebentafusp with CLT.

Conclusions: CLT with tebentafusp was well-tolerated, extending the duration of tebentafusp benefit in a highly selected mUM population. This merits further studies to assess clinical utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信