轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆患者口腔健康相关生活质量和假肢康复:一项系统综述

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Cesare D'Amico, Luca Fiorillo, Cosimo Galletti, Marco Gargari, Alessio Rosa, Mirko Martelli
{"title":"轻度认知障碍和早期痴呆患者口腔健康相关生活质量和假肢康复:一项系统综述","authors":"Cesare D'Amico, Luca Fiorillo, Cosimo Galletti, Marco Gargari, Alessio Rosa, Mirko Martelli","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) face increased challenges in maintaining oral health and prosthetic functionality. As fixed and implant-supported prostheses are increasingly considered in geriatric dentistry, questions remain regarding their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) compared to conventional removable dentures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of prosthetic rehabilitation types on OHRQoL among older adults with MCI or early dementia. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL through March 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated OHRQoL or related patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in individuals aged 60+ with MCI undergoing prosthetic treatment. A total of 18 studies involving 1,457 participants were analyzed. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model revealed a significant improvement in OHIP-14 scores among recipients of fixed or implant-retained prostheses compared to those with conventional dentures (WMD = -5.63; 95% CI: -6.38 to - 4.87; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested enhanced outcomes with implant-retained overdentures. Studies consistently showed improved comfort, mastication, retention, and social confidence with fixed prostheses. Conversely, removable dentures were associated with increased discomfort and dissatisfaction, particularly in individuals with reduced dexterity or poor caregiver support. The risk of bias was low in nearly half of the included studies. These findings highlight the clinical benefits of fixed prosthetic options in enhancing the quality of life in cognitively impaired older adults. Interdisciplinary care, caregiver involvement, and long-term follow-up are crucial for optimizing outcomes. The evidence supports a more tailored prosthetic approach, prioritizing cognitive and functional capacities in conjunction with prosthetic design. Future research should evaluate long-term adaptation, maintenance burden, and cost-effectiveness to further inform decision-making in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral health-related quality of life and prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Cesare D'Amico, Luca Fiorillo, Cosimo Galletti, Marco Gargari, Alessio Rosa, Mirko Martelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) face increased challenges in maintaining oral health and prosthetic functionality. As fixed and implant-supported prostheses are increasingly considered in geriatric dentistry, questions remain regarding their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) compared to conventional removable dentures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of prosthetic rehabilitation types on OHRQoL among older adults with MCI or early dementia. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL through March 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated OHRQoL or related patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in individuals aged 60+ with MCI undergoing prosthetic treatment. A total of 18 studies involving 1,457 participants were analyzed. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model revealed a significant improvement in OHIP-14 scores among recipients of fixed or implant-retained prostheses compared to those with conventional dentures (WMD = -5.63; 95% CI: -6.38 to - 4.87; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested enhanced outcomes with implant-retained overdentures. Studies consistently showed improved comfort, mastication, retention, and social confidence with fixed prostheses. Conversely, removable dentures were associated with increased discomfort and dissatisfaction, particularly in individuals with reduced dexterity or poor caregiver support. The risk of bias was low in nearly half of the included studies. These findings highlight the clinical benefits of fixed prosthetic options in enhancing the quality of life in cognitively impaired older adults. Interdisciplinary care, caregiver involvement, and long-term follow-up are crucial for optimizing outcomes. The evidence supports a more tailored prosthetic approach, prioritizing cognitive and functional capacities in conjunction with prosthetic design. Future research should evaluate long-term adaptation, maintenance burden, and cost-effectiveness to further inform decision-making in this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人在维持口腔健康和修复功能方面面临越来越大的挑战。随着固定和种植义齿在老年牙科中越来越多地被考虑,与传统的活动义齿相比,它们对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响仍然存在问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估假肢康复类型对MCI或早期痴呆老年人OHRQoL的影响。检索在PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Cochrane CENTRAL进行,截止到2025年3月。如果研究评估了60岁以上MCI患者接受假体治疗的OHRQoL或相关患者报告结果(PROMs),则纳入研究。共分析了18项研究,涉及1457名参与者。一项使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析显示,与传统义齿患者相比,固定或种植保留义齿患者的OHIP-14评分有显著改善(WMD = -5.63; 95% CI: -6.38至- 4.87;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral health-related quality of life and prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment and early dementia: a systematic review.

Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) face increased challenges in maintaining oral health and prosthetic functionality. As fixed and implant-supported prostheses are increasingly considered in geriatric dentistry, questions remain regarding their impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) compared to conventional removable dentures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of prosthetic rehabilitation types on OHRQoL among older adults with MCI or early dementia. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL through March 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated OHRQoL or related patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in individuals aged 60+ with MCI undergoing prosthetic treatment. A total of 18 studies involving 1,457 participants were analyzed. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model revealed a significant improvement in OHIP-14 scores among recipients of fixed or implant-retained prostheses compared to those with conventional dentures (WMD = -5.63; 95% CI: -6.38 to - 4.87; p < 0.001), with negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested enhanced outcomes with implant-retained overdentures. Studies consistently showed improved comfort, mastication, retention, and social confidence with fixed prostheses. Conversely, removable dentures were associated with increased discomfort and dissatisfaction, particularly in individuals with reduced dexterity or poor caregiver support. The risk of bias was low in nearly half of the included studies. These findings highlight the clinical benefits of fixed prosthetic options in enhancing the quality of life in cognitively impaired older adults. Interdisciplinary care, caregiver involvement, and long-term follow-up are crucial for optimizing outcomes. The evidence supports a more tailored prosthetic approach, prioritizing cognitive and functional capacities in conjunction with prosthetic design. Future research should evaluate long-term adaptation, maintenance burden, and cost-effectiveness to further inform decision-making in this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信