观点:社会决定因素:全球心理健康干预研究的新可能性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Crick Lund
{"title":"观点:社会决定因素:全球心理健康干预研究的新可能性。","authors":"Crick Lund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its launch in 2007, the field of global mental health has generated substantial research on the social determinants of mental health. Yet relatively little is known about how to intervene to address these social determinants: are such interventions feasible and effective? If they are effective, what are the mechanisms of these effects?</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article interrogates some of the important challenges and potential approaches to consider when intervening to address the social determinants of mental health. Challenges include distal intervention targets, opaque mechanisms, intractable political and structural challenges, the need for interdisciplinary approaches, limited currently available datasets, ethical challenges when conducting trials in this field and challenges to research funders, who may be required to fund beyond their disciplinary silos and to convene inter-disciplinary review panels. Nevertheless, several approaches hold promise. First, we need to build more robust and precise theoretical models of how specific social and economic adversities lead to mental health outcomes. This is vital to clearly identify causal mechanisms that may be targeted in interventions. Second, we must test the specific mechanisms in these hypothesized causal pathways for example through including adequately powered mediation analyses in the design of our trials. Third, data need to be shared and where appropriate, pooled across multiple sites, to provide more statistical power and to take context into consideration. Finally, clear criteria need to guide the choice of which social determinants to target.</p><p><strong>Recommendations for future research: </strong>Regarding observational studies, more research is needed to measure the intergenerational transmission of poverty and mental illness and to explore the mechanisms of poverty and mental health over time. We need to understand more about the links between gender, poverty and mental health across the life course, including genetic, biological and socioeconomic risk and protective factors. In relation to intervention studies, research is needed on interventions that address proximal and more distal mechanisms, for example the impact of living environments, climate change and migration on mental health. We are on the threshold of a new era of heightened risk for a broad range of social and economic determinants triggered by climate change, conflict and migration. There is a great deal more that we could be doing to improve our resilience and responsiveness to these challenging circumstances.</p><p><strong>Recommendations for policy: </strong>Adopting a social determinants approach requires a broadened policy agenda. Global mental health advocacy must now also campaign for improved living environments, human rights and reductions in conflict to improve the mental health of populations and reduce inequities in the distribution of mental health. The policy message is twofold: invest in mental healthcare and invest in interventions that address the social determinants of mental health. This requires broad based whole-of-society approaches with interventions that address both the causes and the consequences of mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"28 3","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERSPECTIVE: Social Determinants: New Possibilities for Intervention Research in Global Mental Health.\",\"authors\":\"Crick Lund\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since its launch in 2007, the field of global mental health has generated substantial research on the social determinants of mental health. Yet relatively little is known about how to intervene to address these social determinants: are such interventions feasible and effective? If they are effective, what are the mechanisms of these effects?</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article interrogates some of the important challenges and potential approaches to consider when intervening to address the social determinants of mental health. Challenges include distal intervention targets, opaque mechanisms, intractable political and structural challenges, the need for interdisciplinary approaches, limited currently available datasets, ethical challenges when conducting trials in this field and challenges to research funders, who may be required to fund beyond their disciplinary silos and to convene inter-disciplinary review panels. Nevertheless, several approaches hold promise. First, we need to build more robust and precise theoretical models of how specific social and economic adversities lead to mental health outcomes. This is vital to clearly identify causal mechanisms that may be targeted in interventions. Second, we must test the specific mechanisms in these hypothesized causal pathways for example through including adequately powered mediation analyses in the design of our trials. Third, data need to be shared and where appropriate, pooled across multiple sites, to provide more statistical power and to take context into consideration. Finally, clear criteria need to guide the choice of which social determinants to target.</p><p><strong>Recommendations for future research: </strong>Regarding observational studies, more research is needed to measure the intergenerational transmission of poverty and mental illness and to explore the mechanisms of poverty and mental health over time. We need to understand more about the links between gender, poverty and mental health across the life course, including genetic, biological and socioeconomic risk and protective factors. In relation to intervention studies, research is needed on interventions that address proximal and more distal mechanisms, for example the impact of living environments, climate change and migration on mental health. We are on the threshold of a new era of heightened risk for a broad range of social and economic determinants triggered by climate change, conflict and migration. There is a great deal more that we could be doing to improve our resilience and responsiveness to these challenging circumstances.</p><p><strong>Recommendations for policy: </strong>Adopting a social determinants approach requires a broadened policy agenda. Global mental health advocacy must now also campaign for improved living environments, human rights and reductions in conflict to improve the mental health of populations and reduce inequities in the distribution of mental health. The policy message is twofold: invest in mental healthcare and invest in interventions that address the social determinants of mental health. This requires broad based whole-of-society approaches with interventions that address both the causes and the consequences of mental illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自2007年启动以来,全球精神卫生领域对精神卫生的社会决定因素进行了大量研究。然而,对于如何干预以解决这些社会决定因素,我们所知相对较少:这些干预措施是否可行和有效?如果它们是有效的,这些效果的机制是什么?讨论:本文探讨了干预解决心理健康的社会决定因素时需要考虑的一些重要挑战和潜在方法。挑战包括远端的干预目标、不透明的机制、棘手的政治和结构挑战、跨学科方法的需求、有限的当前可用数据集、在该领域进行试验时面临的伦理挑战以及研究资助者面临的挑战,他们可能需要资助超出其学科范围的研究,并召集跨学科审查小组。尽管如此,有几种方法还是有希望的。首先,我们需要建立更强大和精确的理论模型,说明特定的社会和经济逆境如何导致心理健康结果。这对于明确确定干预措施可能针对的因果机制至关重要。其次,我们必须在这些假设的因果途径中测试特定的机制,例如,通过在我们的试验设计中包括充分有力的中介分析。第三,数据需要共享,并在适当的情况下跨多个站点汇集,以提供更多的统计能力并考虑上下文。最后,需要明确的标准来指导选择要针对哪些社会决定因素。对未来研究的建议:关于观察性研究,需要更多的研究来衡量贫困和精神疾病的代际传递,并探索贫困和精神健康的长期机制。我们需要更多地了解整个生命过程中性别、贫困和心理健康之间的联系,包括遗传、生物和社会经济风险和保护因素。在干预研究方面,需要研究针对近端和远端机制的干预措施,例如生活环境、气候变化和移民对心理健康的影响。我们即将进入一个新时代,气候变化、冲突和移民引发的一系列社会和经济决定因素的风险加剧。我们还可以做很多事情来提高我们对这些具有挑战性的环境的适应能力和反应能力。政策建议:采用社会决定因素方法需要扩大政策议程。全球心理健康宣传现在还必须开展改善生活环境、人权和减少冲突的运动,以改善人口的心理健康,减少心理健康分配方面的不公平现象。政策信息是双重的:投资于精神卫生保健,并投资于解决精神卫生社会决定因素的干预措施。这就需要采取基础广泛的全社会办法,同时采取干预措施,处理精神疾病的起因和后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PERSPECTIVE: Social Determinants: New Possibilities for Intervention Research in Global Mental Health.

Background: Since its launch in 2007, the field of global mental health has generated substantial research on the social determinants of mental health. Yet relatively little is known about how to intervene to address these social determinants: are such interventions feasible and effective? If they are effective, what are the mechanisms of these effects?

Discussion: This article interrogates some of the important challenges and potential approaches to consider when intervening to address the social determinants of mental health. Challenges include distal intervention targets, opaque mechanisms, intractable political and structural challenges, the need for interdisciplinary approaches, limited currently available datasets, ethical challenges when conducting trials in this field and challenges to research funders, who may be required to fund beyond their disciplinary silos and to convene inter-disciplinary review panels. Nevertheless, several approaches hold promise. First, we need to build more robust and precise theoretical models of how specific social and economic adversities lead to mental health outcomes. This is vital to clearly identify causal mechanisms that may be targeted in interventions. Second, we must test the specific mechanisms in these hypothesized causal pathways for example through including adequately powered mediation analyses in the design of our trials. Third, data need to be shared and where appropriate, pooled across multiple sites, to provide more statistical power and to take context into consideration. Finally, clear criteria need to guide the choice of which social determinants to target.

Recommendations for future research: Regarding observational studies, more research is needed to measure the intergenerational transmission of poverty and mental illness and to explore the mechanisms of poverty and mental health over time. We need to understand more about the links between gender, poverty and mental health across the life course, including genetic, biological and socioeconomic risk and protective factors. In relation to intervention studies, research is needed on interventions that address proximal and more distal mechanisms, for example the impact of living environments, climate change and migration on mental health. We are on the threshold of a new era of heightened risk for a broad range of social and economic determinants triggered by climate change, conflict and migration. There is a great deal more that we could be doing to improve our resilience and responsiveness to these challenging circumstances.

Recommendations for policy: Adopting a social determinants approach requires a broadened policy agenda. Global mental health advocacy must now also campaign for improved living environments, human rights and reductions in conflict to improve the mental health of populations and reduce inequities in the distribution of mental health. The policy message is twofold: invest in mental healthcare and invest in interventions that address the social determinants of mental health. This requires broad based whole-of-society approaches with interventions that address both the causes and the consequences of mental illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信