前路全髋关节置换术中囊包膜神经阻滞与鞘内吗啡在术后镇痛中的应用:一项多中心三盲随机对照试验方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09127-8
Craig Morrison, Tim Cheok, Brigid Brown, Bronwyn Lock, Gemma Saville, Louise de Prinse, Holly Alford, Marni Calvert, Dimitrios Nikos, Nikki May, Hidde M Kroon, Ruurd Jaarsma, Ki Jinn Chin, D-Yin Lin
{"title":"前路全髋关节置换术中囊包膜神经阻滞与鞘内吗啡在术后镇痛中的应用:一项多中心三盲随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Craig Morrison, Tim Cheok, Brigid Brown, Bronwyn Lock, Gemma Saville, Louise de Prinse, Holly Alford, Marni Calvert, Dimitrios Nikos, Nikki May, Hidde M Kroon, Ruurd Jaarsma, Ki Jinn Chin, D-Yin Lin","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09127-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional technique for hip analgesia. Traditionally, intrathecal morphine has been administered for analgesia in hip fracture surgery. Compared with intrathecal morphine, the PENG block may provide superior or equivalent pain score reduction with a more favourable side effect profile and superior patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) that is being conducted at present at two large teaching institutions in Australia. The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) shall be compared to low-dose intrathecal morphine for analgesic effect in elective total Hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach. Primary outcome shall be dynamic pain score evaluation at 3 and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the protocol of our RCT which is currently in the early stages of active recruitment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Ethics approval was obtained from the Southern Area Local Health Network prior to recruitment of the first patient. This trial was prospectively registered prior to initiation on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12623001309673P, 15/12/23, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386688&showOriginal=true&isReview=true .</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre triple blinded randomised controlled trial protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Craig Morrison, Tim Cheok, Brigid Brown, Bronwyn Lock, Gemma Saville, Louise de Prinse, Holly Alford, Marni Calvert, Dimitrios Nikos, Nikki May, Hidde M Kroon, Ruurd Jaarsma, Ki Jinn Chin, D-Yin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09127-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional technique for hip analgesia. Traditionally, intrathecal morphine has been administered for analgesia in hip fracture surgery. Compared with intrathecal morphine, the PENG block may provide superior or equivalent pain score reduction with a more favourable side effect profile and superior patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) that is being conducted at present at two large teaching institutions in Australia. The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) shall be compared to low-dose intrathecal morphine for analgesic effect in elective total Hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach. Primary outcome shall be dynamic pain score evaluation at 3 and 24 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the protocol of our RCT which is currently in the early stages of active recruitment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Ethics approval was obtained from the Southern Area Local Health Network prior to recruitment of the first patient. This trial was prospectively registered prior to initiation on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12623001309673P, 15/12/23, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386688&showOriginal=true&isReview=true .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09127-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09127-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:囊周神经阻滞(PENG)是一种新的局部髋关节镇痛技术。传统上,鞘内注射吗啡用于髋部骨折手术的镇痛。与鞘内吗啡相比,彭阻滞可能提供更好或同等的疼痛评分降低,更有利的副作用和更高的患者满意度。方法:这是一项多中心盲法随机对照试验(RCT),目前正在澳大利亚两家大型教学机构进行。经直接前路择期全髋关节置换术时,将囊周神经群阻滞(PENG阻滞)与低剂量鞘内吗啡的镇痛效果进行比较。术后3和24小时的动态疼痛评分是主要预后指标。讨论:这是我们目前处于积极招募初期的随机对照试验的方案。试验注册:在招募第一名患者之前,已获得南区地方卫生网络的伦理批准。该试验在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验登记处进行了前瞻性注册。澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12623001309673P, 15/12/23, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386688&showOriginal=true&isReview=true。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre triple blinded randomised controlled trial protocol.

Background: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional technique for hip analgesia. Traditionally, intrathecal morphine has been administered for analgesia in hip fracture surgery. Compared with intrathecal morphine, the PENG block may provide superior or equivalent pain score reduction with a more favourable side effect profile and superior patient satisfaction.

Methods: This is a multicentre blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) that is being conducted at present at two large teaching institutions in Australia. The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG block) shall be compared to low-dose intrathecal morphine for analgesic effect in elective total Hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach. Primary outcome shall be dynamic pain score evaluation at 3 and 24 h postoperatively.

Discussion: This is the protocol of our RCT which is currently in the early stages of active recruitment.

Trial registration: Ethics approval was obtained from the Southern Area Local Health Network prior to recruitment of the first patient. This trial was prospectively registered prior to initiation on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12623001309673P, 15/12/23, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386688&showOriginal=true&isReview=true .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信