{"title":"环形吻合器末端结肠造口术与传统末端结肠造口术在永久性造口患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Avanish Saklani, Mufaddal Kazi, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circular stapled end colostomy versus conventional end colostomy creation in patients undergoing a permanent stoma: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Avanish Saklani, Mufaddal Kazi, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Circular stapled end colostomy versus conventional end colostomy creation in patients undergoing a permanent stoma: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.
Discussion: The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.
期刊介绍:
Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.