环形吻合器末端结肠造口术与传统末端结肠造口术在永久性造口患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8
Avanish Saklani, Mufaddal Kazi, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza
{"title":"环形吻合器末端结肠造口术与传统末端结肠造口术在永久性造口患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Avanish Saklani, Mufaddal Kazi, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circular stapled end colostomy versus conventional end colostomy creation in patients undergoing a permanent stoma: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Avanish Saklani, Mufaddal Kazi, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09135-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:造口旁疝是结肠造口术的常见并发症,2年后发生率高达60%。传统的方法,包括使用网格,已经显示出有限的成功。在这里,我们的目标是比较1年PSH率,并评估使用订书术和常规方法的造口相关并发症。方法:本随机对照试验研究了与传统技术相比,使用圆形吻合器进行结肠末端造口术以减少造口旁疝(PSH)发生率的疗效。在塔塔纪念医院接受直肠癌末端结肠造口术的符合条件的患者(18-70岁)将随机分为两组:圆形钉接切口和传统十字切口。主要结果将是1年PSH率,由临床和放射学决定,次要结果包括短期造口相关并发症和再手术率。讨论:该研究结果将为圆形订书机在减少PSH发病率方面的有效性提供证据,可能为造口术提供一种创新的方法。如果成功,该技术可以改善患者的预后,并减少与PSH管理相关的长期医疗保健费用。试验注册CTRI/2023/10/059362;协议版本1.2。注册日期:2023年3月11日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Circular stapled end colostomy versus conventional end colostomy creation in patients undergoing a permanent stoma: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Parastomal herniation is a prevalent complication of colostomies, with rates as high as 60% at 2 years. Traditional methods, including mesh use, have shown limited success. Here, we aim to compare 1-year PSH rates and evaluate stoma-related complications using a stapled versus conventional approach.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy of using a circular stapler to create an end colostomy for reducing parastomal hernia (PSH) incidence compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients (aged 18-70) undergoing end colostomy for rectal cancer at Tata Memorial Hospital will be randomized into two groups: circular stapled versus conventional cruciate incision. Primary outcomes will be 1-year PSH rates, determined clinically and radiologically, with secondary outcomes including short-term stoma-related complications and reoperation rates.

Discussion: The study's findings will provide evidence on the circular stapler's effectiveness in reducing PSH incidence, potentially offering an innovative approach to ostomy creation. If successful, this technique may improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term healthcare costs related to PSH management. Trial registration CTRI/2023/10/059362; protocol version 1.2. Registered on March 11, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信