超越qsar:定量知识-活动关系(QKARs)用于增强药物毒性预测。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Ting Li, Yanyan Qu, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Dongying Li, Weida Tong
{"title":"超越qsar:定量知识-活动关系(QKARs)用于增强药物毒性预测。","authors":"Ting Li, Yanyan Qu, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Dongying Li, Weida Tong","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predict toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five ML algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs) for Enhanced Drug Toxicity Prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Ting Li, Yanyan Qu, Alexander Chen, Shraddha Thakkar, Dongying Li, Weida Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predict toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five ML algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算毒理学在风险评估和药物安全中发挥着重要作用。该领域传统上由定量构效关系(QSARs)主导,仅根据化学结构预测毒理学效应。尽管qsar已经取得了成功,但它们的结构依赖性限制了药物毒性预测,其中微小的结构修饰可能导致重大的毒性变化。人工智能(AI)的进步,特别是文本嵌入和生成式AI,为利用更广泛的化学知识及其与结构数据的集成来增强毒性预测提供了机会。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个新的框架,定量知识-活动关系(QKARs),它使用特定领域的知识来预测毒性。我们开发了两个药物毒性终点的QKAR模型,药物性肝损伤(DILI)和药物性心脏毒性(DICT),使用三种不同知识水平的不同知识表示。基于药物综合知识的表示比基于简单知识的表示产生更好的预测效果。在QKAR模型中应用了五种不同复杂度的ML算法,我们观察到模型复杂度与性能之间的相关性很小。此外,我们使用相同的数据集对相同端点上的qkar和qsar进行了评估。我们发现qkar在DILI和DICT上的表现始终优于qsar。值得注意的是,qkar在区分结构相似但肝毒性不同的药物方面表现出比qsar更好的能力。我们还研究了基于知识和基于结构的表示(Q(K + S) ar)的整合,以进一步提高预测精度。我们的研究结果证明了qkar作为qsar的强大替代品的潜力,通过利用特定领域的知识和结构数据,为药物毒性评估提供了额外的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond QSARs: Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs) for Enhanced Drug Toxicity Prediction.

Computational toxicology plays an important role in risk assessment and drug safety. The field has been traditionally dominated by Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), which predict toxicological effects based solely on chemical structure. Although QSARs have achieved successes, their structure reliance limits drug toxicity predictions, where small structural modifications may cause major toxicity changes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially text embedding and generative AI, provide an opportunity to enhance toxicity predictions by leveraging broader chemical knowledge and its integration with structural data. In this study, we propose a novel framework, Quantitative Knowledge-Activity Relationships (QKARs), which predict toxicity using domain-specific knowledge. We developed QKAR models for two drug toxicity endpoints, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and drug-induced cardiotoxicity (DICT), using three different knowledge representations with varying levels of knowledge. The representations based on comprehensive knowledge of the drugs yielded better prediction than those with simpler knowledge. Five ML algorithms of distinct complexity were applied in QKAR models, and we observed little association between model complexity and performance. Further, we evaluated QKARs against QSARs on the same endpoints using identical datasets. We found that QKARs consistently outperformed QSARs for DILI and DICT. Notably, QKARs demonstrated better capability than QSARs in differentiating drugs with similar structures but different liver toxicity profiles. We also investigated integrating knowledge-based and structure-based representations, Q(K + S)ARs, for further enhanced prediction accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the potential of QKARs as a robust alternative to QSARs, offering additional opportunities in drug toxicity assessments by leveraging both domain-specific knowledge and structural data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信