用动态淋巴细胞流模型预测局部晚期宫颈癌VMAT和IMPT治疗的淋巴细胞剂量和存活分数。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sander Cyril Kuipers, Marianne van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Danny Lathouwers, Anouk Corbeau, Stephanie M de Boer, Remi A Nout, Mischa S Hoogeman, Jeremy Godart
{"title":"用动态淋巴细胞流模型预测局部晚期宫颈癌VMAT和IMPT治疗的淋巴细胞剂量和存活分数。","authors":"Sander Cyril Kuipers, Marianne van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Danny Lathouwers, Anouk Corbeau, Stephanie M de Boer, Remi A Nout, Mischa S Hoogeman, Jeremy Godart","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ae0d29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A dynamic model is developed to predict the impact of radiotherapy on circulating lymphocyte counts in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study aims to compare the effects of photon and proton therapy, as well as the influence of bone marrow sparing techniques, on relative lymphocyte preservation over time.&#xD;Approach. A dynamic lymphocyte flow model was developed to simulate the migration of lymphocytes based on seven compartments. Biological cell death and lymphocyte production were integrated across compartments. The lymphocyte flow model was applied to 19 LACC patients. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans were created for each patient without bone marrow sparing (BMS) and with BMS. The model calculated radiation dose to lymphocytes to estimate radiation-induced cell death over time. The output of the model was the relative lymphocyte count relative to baseline (RLC) over time and the RLC nadir in the blood and total body.&#xD;Main results. According to the model, IMPT resulted in lower doses to lymphocytes and higher RLC nadir than VMAT for all 19 patients. The total RLC nadir (mean ± SD) was 48.4% ± 4.0% for VMAT and 62.5% ± 5.1% for IMPT. In the blood compartment, the RLC nadir was 32.7% ± 3.5% for VMAT and 47.7% ± 5.9% for IMPT. The RLC nadir in the blood compartment improved with 3 Gy BMS from 32.7% ± 3.5% to 33.0% ± 3.5%, while it decreased for IMPT from 47.7% ± 5.9% to 46.6% ± 6.0%. Total RLC nadir decreased with BMS for VMAT from 48.4% ± 4.0% to 48.2% ± 3.9% and for IMPT from 62.5% ± 5.1% to 60.9% ± 5.3%.&#xD;Significance. By incorporating a dynamic flow model, we predicted the RLC over time. The model predicted a substantial sparing effect IMPT has on the lymphocytes compared to VMAT. This sparing was both present in the blood and the total body. Sparing the bone marrow showed only a minimal effect on the RLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting lymphocyte dose and surviving fraction for VMAT and IMPT treatments with a dynamic lymphocyte flow model for locally advanced cervical cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sander Cyril Kuipers, Marianne van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Danny Lathouwers, Anouk Corbeau, Stephanie M de Boer, Remi A Nout, Mischa S Hoogeman, Jeremy Godart\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ae0d29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A dynamic model is developed to predict the impact of radiotherapy on circulating lymphocyte counts in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study aims to compare the effects of photon and proton therapy, as well as the influence of bone marrow sparing techniques, on relative lymphocyte preservation over time.&#xD;Approach. A dynamic lymphocyte flow model was developed to simulate the migration of lymphocytes based on seven compartments. Biological cell death and lymphocyte production were integrated across compartments. The lymphocyte flow model was applied to 19 LACC patients. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans were created for each patient without bone marrow sparing (BMS) and with BMS. The model calculated radiation dose to lymphocytes to estimate radiation-induced cell death over time. The output of the model was the relative lymphocyte count relative to baseline (RLC) over time and the RLC nadir in the blood and total body.&#xD;Main results. According to the model, IMPT resulted in lower doses to lymphocytes and higher RLC nadir than VMAT for all 19 patients. The total RLC nadir (mean ± SD) was 48.4% ± 4.0% for VMAT and 62.5% ± 5.1% for IMPT. In the blood compartment, the RLC nadir was 32.7% ± 3.5% for VMAT and 47.7% ± 5.9% for IMPT. The RLC nadir in the blood compartment improved with 3 Gy BMS from 32.7% ± 3.5% to 33.0% ± 3.5%, while it decreased for IMPT from 47.7% ± 5.9% to 46.6% ± 6.0%. Total RLC nadir decreased with BMS for VMAT from 48.4% ± 4.0% to 48.2% ± 3.9% and for IMPT from 62.5% ± 5.1% to 60.9% ± 5.3%.&#xD;Significance. By incorporating a dynamic flow model, we predicted the RLC over time. The model predicted a substantial sparing effect IMPT has on the lymphocytes compared to VMAT. This sparing was both present in the blood and the total body. Sparing the bone marrow showed only a minimal effect on the RLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae0d29\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae0d29","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立放射治疗对局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)妇女循环淋巴细胞计数影响的动态模型。本研究旨在比较光子和质子治疗的效果,以及骨髓保留技术对相对淋巴细胞保存的影响。建立了一个基于7个区室的动态淋巴细胞流动模型来模拟淋巴细胞的迁移。生物细胞的死亡和淋巴细胞的产生是跨区室整合的。19例LACC患者采用淋巴细胞流模型。为每位无骨髓保留(BMS)和有骨髓保留(BMS)的患者制定了体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)和强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)治疗方案。该模型计算淋巴细胞的辐射剂量,以估计辐射引起的细胞死亡随时间的变化。模型的输出是随时间的相对淋巴细胞计数相对于基线(RLC)以及血液和全身RLC的最低点。主要结果。根据模型,与VMAT相比,IMPT对所有19例患者的淋巴细胞剂量更低,RLC最低点更高。VMAT和IMPT的总RLC最低点(平均±SD)分别为48.4%±4.0%和62.5%±5.1%。在血室中,VMAT和IMPT的RLC最低点分别为32.7%±3.5%和47.7%±5.9%。3 Gy BMS使血室RLC最低点从32.7%±3.5%提高到33.0%±3.5%,而IMPT则从47.7%±5.9%降低到46.6%±6.0%。VMAT的总RLC最低点随BMS而下降,从48.4%±4.0%降至48.2%±3.9%,IMPT从62.5%±5.1%降至60.9%±5.3%。通过结合动态流模型,我们预测了RLC随时间的变化。该模型预测,与VMAT相比,IMPT对淋巴细胞具有实质性的保护作用。这种节约既存在于血液中,也存在于全身。保留骨髓对RLC的影响微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting lymphocyte dose and surviving fraction for VMAT and IMPT treatments with a dynamic lymphocyte flow model for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Objective: A dynamic model is developed to predict the impact of radiotherapy on circulating lymphocyte counts in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study aims to compare the effects of photon and proton therapy, as well as the influence of bone marrow sparing techniques, on relative lymphocyte preservation over time. Approach. A dynamic lymphocyte flow model was developed to simulate the migration of lymphocytes based on seven compartments. Biological cell death and lymphocyte production were integrated across compartments. The lymphocyte flow model was applied to 19 LACC patients. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans were created for each patient without bone marrow sparing (BMS) and with BMS. The model calculated radiation dose to lymphocytes to estimate radiation-induced cell death over time. The output of the model was the relative lymphocyte count relative to baseline (RLC) over time and the RLC nadir in the blood and total body. Main results. According to the model, IMPT resulted in lower doses to lymphocytes and higher RLC nadir than VMAT for all 19 patients. The total RLC nadir (mean ± SD) was 48.4% ± 4.0% for VMAT and 62.5% ± 5.1% for IMPT. In the blood compartment, the RLC nadir was 32.7% ± 3.5% for VMAT and 47.7% ± 5.9% for IMPT. The RLC nadir in the blood compartment improved with 3 Gy BMS from 32.7% ± 3.5% to 33.0% ± 3.5%, while it decreased for IMPT from 47.7% ± 5.9% to 46.6% ± 6.0%. Total RLC nadir decreased with BMS for VMAT from 48.4% ± 4.0% to 48.2% ± 3.9% and for IMPT from 62.5% ± 5.1% to 60.9% ± 5.3%. Significance. By incorporating a dynamic flow model, we predicted the RLC over time. The model predicted a substantial sparing effect IMPT has on the lymphocytes compared to VMAT. This sparing was both present in the blood and the total body. Sparing the bone marrow showed only a minimal effect on the RLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信