头孢唑林与利奈唑胺和头孢唑林与克林霉素联用对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的作用无显著影响。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Madeline Mellett, Julia Van Riel, Rachel Corsini, Sarah Satola, Alexander Lawandi, Chelsea Caya, Sebastiaan J van Hal, Todd C Lee, Jesse Papenburg, Cedric P Yansouni, Ahmed Babiker, Matthew P Cheng
{"title":"头孢唑林与利奈唑胺和头孢唑林与克林霉素联用对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的作用无显著影响。","authors":"Madeline Mellett, Julia Van Riel, Rachel Corsini, Sarah Satola, Alexander Lawandi, Chelsea Caya, Sebastiaan J van Hal, Todd C Lee, Jesse Papenburg, Cedric P Yansouni, Ahmed Babiker, Matthew P Cheng","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.01763-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial combinations resulting in synergy against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> are desirable for improving clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe infections caused by this pathogen. Despite an existing biological rationale for the combination of cefazolin and linezolid for methicillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> (MSSA), this combination has yet to be evaluated for <i>in vitro</i> synergy. We employed the checkerboard and E-test methods of synergy assessment to evaluate cefazolin in combination with linezolid against 19 clinical MSSA isolates from two centers and compared the findings to cefazolin in combination with another protein synthesis inhibitor, clindamycin. Synergy was determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) through both the checkerboard and combined E-test assays. Combinations of cefazolin with linezolid and clindamycin demonstrated indifference through both methods (median checkerboard FICI of 1.11 and 1.25 and median E-test FICI of 0.99 and 0.88, respectively). Although the studied combinations were not synergistic, results of both assays were categorically consistent and suggest that the E-test is a robust method for evaluating synergy in <i>S. aureus</i> isolates.IMPORTANCEThe combinations of cefazolin and linezolid and cefazolin with clindamycin are potentially clinically relevant combinations for the treatment of severe <i>S. aureus</i> infections. However, the synergistic effects of these combinations against clinical MSSA isolates have not been previously determined. We performed checkerboard and E-test synergy testing and demonstrated that these combinations were indifferent for MSSA isolates. Although synergy was not identified for these combinations, the methods of synergy assessment agreed, highlighting the potential benefit for the combined gradient diffusion assay in future synergy assessment. Due to ease of use and categorical agreement with the checkerboard method in this study, this method may be beneficial for further implementation in synergy testing, leading to the identification of synergistic combinations that may improve treatment success for severe <i>S. aureus</i> infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0176325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combinations of cefazolin with linezolid and cefazolin with clindamycin are indifferent against methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Mellett, Julia Van Riel, Rachel Corsini, Sarah Satola, Alexander Lawandi, Chelsea Caya, Sebastiaan J van Hal, Todd C Lee, Jesse Papenburg, Cedric P Yansouni, Ahmed Babiker, Matthew P Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.01763-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial combinations resulting in synergy against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> are desirable for improving clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe infections caused by this pathogen. Despite an existing biological rationale for the combination of cefazolin and linezolid for methicillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> (MSSA), this combination has yet to be evaluated for <i>in vitro</i> synergy. We employed the checkerboard and E-test methods of synergy assessment to evaluate cefazolin in combination with linezolid against 19 clinical MSSA isolates from two centers and compared the findings to cefazolin in combination with another protein synthesis inhibitor, clindamycin. Synergy was determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) through both the checkerboard and combined E-test assays. Combinations of cefazolin with linezolid and clindamycin demonstrated indifference through both methods (median checkerboard FICI of 1.11 and 1.25 and median E-test FICI of 0.99 and 0.88, respectively). Although the studied combinations were not synergistic, results of both assays were categorically consistent and suggest that the E-test is a robust method for evaluating synergy in <i>S. aureus</i> isolates.IMPORTANCEThe combinations of cefazolin and linezolid and cefazolin with clindamycin are potentially clinically relevant combinations for the treatment of severe <i>S. aureus</i> infections. However, the synergistic effects of these combinations against clinical MSSA isolates have not been previously determined. We performed checkerboard and E-test synergy testing and demonstrated that these combinations were indifferent for MSSA isolates. Although synergy was not identified for these combinations, the methods of synergy assessment agreed, highlighting the potential benefit for the combined gradient diffusion assay in future synergy assessment. Due to ease of use and categorical agreement with the checkerboard method in this study, this method may be beneficial for further implementation in synergy testing, leading to the identification of synergistic combinations that may improve treatment success for severe <i>S. aureus</i> infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0176325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01763-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01763-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对金黄色葡萄球菌产生协同作用的抗菌素组合对于提高治疗由该病原体引起的严重感染的临床疗效是可取的。尽管头孢唑林和利奈唑胺联合治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)已有生物学依据,但这种联合治疗的体外协同作用尚未得到评估。采用棋盘法和E-test协同评价方法,对头孢唑林联合利奈唑胺对来自两个中心的19株MSSA临床分离株进行了评价,并与头孢唑林联合另一种蛋白质合成抑制剂克林霉素进行了比较。协同作用是通过棋盘和联合e检验测定分数抑制浓度指数(FICI)来确定的。头孢唑林与利奈唑胺和克林霉素联用两种方法均无差异(棋盘FICI中值分别为1.11和1.25,E-test中值FICI分别为0.99和0.88)。虽然所研究的组合不具有协同作用,但两种分析的结果是绝对一致的,这表明E-test是评估金黄色葡萄球菌分离株协同作用的可靠方法。头孢唑林与利奈唑胺联用以及头孢唑林与克林霉素联用是治疗严重金黄色葡萄球菌感染的潜在临床相关组合。然而,这些组合对临床分离的MSSA的协同作用尚未确定。我们进行了棋盘和E-test协同检验,并证明这些组合对MSSA分离株是无关的。虽然没有确定这些组合的协同作用,但协同作用评估方法一致,强调了联合梯度扩散试验在未来协同作用评估中的潜在益处。由于该方法易于使用,并且与本研究中的棋盘法完全一致,因此该方法可能有利于在协同试验中进一步实施,从而确定可能提高严重金黄色葡萄球菌感染治疗成功率的协同组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The combinations of cefazolin with linezolid and cefazolin with clindamycin are indifferent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Antimicrobial combinations resulting in synergy against Staphylococcus aureus are desirable for improving clinical efficacy in the treatment of severe infections caused by this pathogen. Despite an existing biological rationale for the combination of cefazolin and linezolid for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), this combination has yet to be evaluated for in vitro synergy. We employed the checkerboard and E-test methods of synergy assessment to evaluate cefazolin in combination with linezolid against 19 clinical MSSA isolates from two centers and compared the findings to cefazolin in combination with another protein synthesis inhibitor, clindamycin. Synergy was determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) through both the checkerboard and combined E-test assays. Combinations of cefazolin with linezolid and clindamycin demonstrated indifference through both methods (median checkerboard FICI of 1.11 and 1.25 and median E-test FICI of 0.99 and 0.88, respectively). Although the studied combinations were not synergistic, results of both assays were categorically consistent and suggest that the E-test is a robust method for evaluating synergy in S. aureus isolates.IMPORTANCEThe combinations of cefazolin and linezolid and cefazolin with clindamycin are potentially clinically relevant combinations for the treatment of severe S. aureus infections. However, the synergistic effects of these combinations against clinical MSSA isolates have not been previously determined. We performed checkerboard and E-test synergy testing and demonstrated that these combinations were indifferent for MSSA isolates. Although synergy was not identified for these combinations, the methods of synergy assessment agreed, highlighting the potential benefit for the combined gradient diffusion assay in future synergy assessment. Due to ease of use and categorical agreement with the checkerboard method in this study, this method may be beneficial for further implementation in synergy testing, leading to the identification of synergistic combinations that may improve treatment success for severe S. aureus infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信