抗高血压药物对体重改变的目标试验模拟。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Pi-I D Lin, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Joshua Petimar, Han Yu, Matthew F Daley, David M Janicke, William J Heerman, L Charles Bailey, Carlos Maeztu, Kristina H Lewis, Jessica G Young, Jason P Block
{"title":"抗高血压药物对体重改变的目标试验模拟。","authors":"Pi-I D Lin, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Joshua Petimar, Han Yu, Matthew F Daley, David M Janicke, William J Heerman, L Charles Bailey, Carlos Maeztu, Kristina H Lewis, Jessica G Young, Jason P Block","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09787-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain after starting antihypertensive medications is a frequent concern for patients, but there is limited data on expected weight change after initiation of these medications. A comparative effectiveness trial to evaluate this outcome would not be feasible.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate and compare average weight change under initiating and adhering to commonly prescribed, first-line antihypertensive medications as monotherapy by emulating a target trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study over 24 months of follow-up using electronic health records (EHR).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>141,260 patients prescribed one of seven antihypertensives between 2010 and 2019 across 8 US health systems.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>We examined mean weight change associated with initiation of and adherence to amlodipine, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, losartan, metoprolol, or propranolol, relative to lisinopril, at 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation. To adjust for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement, we used inverse probability weighting with repeated outcome marginal structural models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>After baseline and time-varying covariate adjustment, initiation of and adherence to lisinopril were associated with mean weight loss at 6 months (- 0.69 kg, 95% CI - 0.92, - 0.47), 12 months (- 0.58 kg, 95% CI - 1.05, - 0.30), and 24 months (- 1.121 kg, 95% CI - 2.013, - 0.46). Compared to lisinopril, the estimated 6-month weight change was higher for patients prescribed hydrochlorothiazide (0.68 kg, 95% CI 0.31, 1.04), losartan (0.54 kg, 95% CI 0.17, 0.93), metoprolol (1.38 kg, 95% CI 0.95, 1.76), and propranolol (1.03 kg, 95% CI 0.346, 1.62). At 12 months, metoprolol (1.74 kg, 95% CI 1.03, 2.41) and propranolol (1.72 kg, 95% CI 0.06, 3.235) continued to show higher weight change compared to lisinopril.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed small differences in weight change across antihypertensive medications, with lisinopril leading to weight loss and metoprolol and propranolol to modest weight gain. Clinicians should consider potential weight gain when selecting antihypertensive medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emulation of a Target Trial of Antihypertensive Medications on Weight Change.\",\"authors\":\"Pi-I D Lin, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Joshua Petimar, Han Yu, Matthew F Daley, David M Janicke, William J Heerman, L Charles Bailey, Carlos Maeztu, Kristina H Lewis, Jessica G Young, Jason P Block\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09787-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Weight gain after starting antihypertensive medications is a frequent concern for patients, but there is limited data on expected weight change after initiation of these medications. A comparative effectiveness trial to evaluate this outcome would not be feasible.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate and compare average weight change under initiating and adhering to commonly prescribed, first-line antihypertensive medications as monotherapy by emulating a target trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study over 24 months of follow-up using electronic health records (EHR).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>141,260 patients prescribed one of seven antihypertensives between 2010 and 2019 across 8 US health systems.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>We examined mean weight change associated with initiation of and adherence to amlodipine, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, losartan, metoprolol, or propranolol, relative to lisinopril, at 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation. To adjust for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement, we used inverse probability weighting with repeated outcome marginal structural models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>After baseline and time-varying covariate adjustment, initiation of and adherence to lisinopril were associated with mean weight loss at 6 months (- 0.69 kg, 95% CI - 0.92, - 0.47), 12 months (- 0.58 kg, 95% CI - 1.05, - 0.30), and 24 months (- 1.121 kg, 95% CI - 2.013, - 0.46). Compared to lisinopril, the estimated 6-month weight change was higher for patients prescribed hydrochlorothiazide (0.68 kg, 95% CI 0.31, 1.04), losartan (0.54 kg, 95% CI 0.17, 0.93), metoprolol (1.38 kg, 95% CI 0.95, 1.76), and propranolol (1.03 kg, 95% CI 0.346, 1.62). At 12 months, metoprolol (1.74 kg, 95% CI 1.03, 2.41) and propranolol (1.72 kg, 95% CI 0.06, 3.235) continued to show higher weight change compared to lisinopril.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed small differences in weight change across antihypertensive medications, with lisinopril leading to weight loss and metoprolol and propranolol to modest weight gain. Clinicians should consider potential weight gain when selecting antihypertensive medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09787-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09787-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:开始服用降压药后体重增加是患者经常关注的问题,但关于开始服用这些药物后预期体重变化的数据有限。评价这一结果的比较有效性试验是不可行的。目的:通过模拟目标试验,估计和比较在开始和坚持常用的一线抗高血压药物作为单一疗法时的平均体重变化。设计:采用电子健康记录(EHR)随访24个月的回顾性观察队列研究。参与者:2010年至2019年期间,美国8个卫生系统的141260名患者开了7种抗高血压药中的一种。主要结局和测量:我们在开始服用氨氯地平、阿替洛尔、氢氯噻嗪、氯沙坦、美托洛尔或心得安后6、12和24个月,相对于赖诺普利,检查了与开始服用和坚持服用相关的平均体重变化。为了调整基线混淆和信息性结果测量,我们使用了重复结果边际结构模型的逆概率加权。关键结果:在基线和时变协变量调整后,开始使用赖诺普利和坚持使用赖诺普利与6个月(- 0.69 kg, 95% CI - 0.92, - 0.47)、12个月(- 0.58 kg, 95% CI - 1.05, - 0.30)和24个月(- 1.121 kg, 95% CI - 2.013, - 0.46)的平均体重减轻相关。与赖诺普利相比,服用氢氯噻嗪(0.68 kg, 95% CI 0.31, 1.04)、氯沙坦(0.54 kg, 95% CI 0.17, 0.93)、美托洛尔(1.38 kg, 95% CI 0.95, 1.76)和心得安(1.03 kg, 95% CI 0.346, 1.62)的患者估计6个月体重变化更高。在12个月时,美托洛尔(1.74 kg, 95% CI 1.03, 2.41)和心得安(1.72 kg, 95% CI 0.06, 3.235)的体重变化继续高于赖诺普利。结论:我们观察到不同抗高血压药物的体重变化差异不大,赖诺普利导致体重减轻,美托洛尔和心得安导致体重适度增加。临床医生在选择抗高血压药物时应考虑潜在的体重增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emulation of a Target Trial of Antihypertensive Medications on Weight Change.

Background: Weight gain after starting antihypertensive medications is a frequent concern for patients, but there is limited data on expected weight change after initiation of these medications. A comparative effectiveness trial to evaluate this outcome would not be feasible.

Objective: To estimate and compare average weight change under initiating and adhering to commonly prescribed, first-line antihypertensive medications as monotherapy by emulating a target trial.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study over 24 months of follow-up using electronic health records (EHR).

Participants: 141,260 patients prescribed one of seven antihypertensives between 2010 and 2019 across 8 US health systems.

Main outcome and measures: We examined mean weight change associated with initiation of and adherence to amlodipine, atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide, losartan, metoprolol, or propranolol, relative to lisinopril, at 6, 12, and 24 months after initiation. To adjust for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement, we used inverse probability weighting with repeated outcome marginal structural models.

Key results: After baseline and time-varying covariate adjustment, initiation of and adherence to lisinopril were associated with mean weight loss at 6 months (- 0.69 kg, 95% CI - 0.92, - 0.47), 12 months (- 0.58 kg, 95% CI - 1.05, - 0.30), and 24 months (- 1.121 kg, 95% CI - 2.013, - 0.46). Compared to lisinopril, the estimated 6-month weight change was higher for patients prescribed hydrochlorothiazide (0.68 kg, 95% CI 0.31, 1.04), losartan (0.54 kg, 95% CI 0.17, 0.93), metoprolol (1.38 kg, 95% CI 0.95, 1.76), and propranolol (1.03 kg, 95% CI 0.346, 1.62). At 12 months, metoprolol (1.74 kg, 95% CI 1.03, 2.41) and propranolol (1.72 kg, 95% CI 0.06, 3.235) continued to show higher weight change compared to lisinopril.

Conclusion: We observed small differences in weight change across antihypertensive medications, with lisinopril leading to weight loss and metoprolol and propranolol to modest weight gain. Clinicians should consider potential weight gain when selecting antihypertensive medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信