对A类β -内酰胺酶A2亚类ESBL活性的机制研究揭示了赋予耐药性的独特策略。

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Riya Karan, Anish Pyne, Saroj K Panda, Parth S Sen Gupta, Saugata Hazra
{"title":"对A类β -内酰胺酶A2亚类ESBL活性的机制研究揭示了赋予耐药性的独特策略。","authors":"Riya Karan, Anish Pyne, Saroj K Panda, Parth S Sen Gupta, Saugata Hazra","doi":"10.1080/07391102.2025.2563080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The twenty first century has witnessed challenges with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emerging as a critical global threat. Among its most concerning is antibiotic resistance (ABR), highly linked to beta-lactamases. Among others, Class A beta-lactamases, present significantly with functional diversity, although ESBLs are one of the major concerns. A key defence mechanism in Gram-negative bacteria is the overexpression of ESBLs (<b>E</b>xtended <b>s</b>pectrum <b>b</b>eta-<b>l</b>actamases) which spread across the bacterial population through horizontal gene transfer causes serious nosocomial infections. Since ESBLs have developed to increase their substrate specificity and hydrolyse most cephalosporins, penicillins, and monobactams, research into them is urgently needed.However, despite attempts functional classification, based on sequence identity, fold similarity, the presence or absence of insertions, particularly in loop regions and mode of action, a universally accepted framework remains elusive. Previous studies have broadly categorized Class A beta-lactamases into subclasses A1 and A2, yet the mechanistic intricacies of subclass A2 only as ESBL demand a more nuanced, multilevel analysis, underlying their role in antibiotic resistance. To bridge this knowledge gap, we employed on a comprehensive investigation encompassing sequence, structure, molecular docking, and dynamic analyses to elucidate the mechanistic approach of antibiotic resistance profiles for these two subclasses. Our sequence and structural studies revealed differences, particularly in insertions, structural alignments, and loop regions, including the omega loop and loops near the active site. Molecular docking study demonstrated better binding of the bigger substrate in the active site cavity of A2 subclass representatives. Dynamic analyses further confirmed our findings, employing root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), flexibility of the extended and omega loops, radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), clustering, hydrogen bonding patterns, principal component analysis (PCA), and free energy landscape (FEL). This study provides insights into the molecular distinctions and resistance mechanisms of these subclasses, paving the way for advanced research in antibiotic resistance and strengthening novel therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic insights into ESBL activity of subclass A2 in Class A beta-lactamase revealing a distinct strategy towards conferring drug resistance.\",\"authors\":\"Riya Karan, Anish Pyne, Saroj K Panda, Parth S Sen Gupta, Saugata Hazra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07391102.2025.2563080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The twenty first century has witnessed challenges with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emerging as a critical global threat. Among its most concerning is antibiotic resistance (ABR), highly linked to beta-lactamases. Among others, Class A beta-lactamases, present significantly with functional diversity, although ESBLs are one of the major concerns. A key defence mechanism in Gram-negative bacteria is the overexpression of ESBLs (<b>E</b>xtended <b>s</b>pectrum <b>b</b>eta-<b>l</b>actamases) which spread across the bacterial population through horizontal gene transfer causes serious nosocomial infections. Since ESBLs have developed to increase their substrate specificity and hydrolyse most cephalosporins, penicillins, and monobactams, research into them is urgently needed.However, despite attempts functional classification, based on sequence identity, fold similarity, the presence or absence of insertions, particularly in loop regions and mode of action, a universally accepted framework remains elusive. Previous studies have broadly categorized Class A beta-lactamases into subclasses A1 and A2, yet the mechanistic intricacies of subclass A2 only as ESBL demand a more nuanced, multilevel analysis, underlying their role in antibiotic resistance. To bridge this knowledge gap, we employed on a comprehensive investigation encompassing sequence, structure, molecular docking, and dynamic analyses to elucidate the mechanistic approach of antibiotic resistance profiles for these two subclasses. Our sequence and structural studies revealed differences, particularly in insertions, structural alignments, and loop regions, including the omega loop and loops near the active site. Molecular docking study demonstrated better binding of the bigger substrate in the active site cavity of A2 subclass representatives. Dynamic analyses further confirmed our findings, employing root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), flexibility of the extended and omega loops, radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), clustering, hydrogen bonding patterns, principal component analysis (PCA), and free energy landscape (FEL). This study provides insights into the molecular distinctions and resistance mechanisms of these subclasses, paving the way for advanced research in antibiotic resistance and strengthening novel therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2025.2563080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2025.2563080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪见证了抗菌素耐药性(AMR)成为重大全球威胁的挑战。其中最令人担忧的是抗生素耐药性(ABR),它与β -内酰胺酶高度相关。其中,A类β -内酰胺酶具有显著的功能多样性,尽管ESBLs是主要关注的问题之一。革兰氏阴性菌的一个关键防御机制是ESBLs(扩展谱β -内酰胺酶)的过度表达,ESBLs通过水平基因转移在细菌群体中传播,导致严重的医院感染。由于ESBLs已经发展到提高底物特异性和水解大多数头孢菌素、青霉素类和单孢菌类,因此迫切需要对其进行研究。然而,尽管尝试了基于序列同一性、折叠相似性、插入是否存在(特别是在环区和作用方式)的功能分类,但普遍接受的框架仍然难以捉摸。先前的研究将A类β -内酰胺酶大致分为A1和A2亚类,但A2亚类仅作为ESBL的机制复杂性需要更细致、多层次的分析,以确定它们在抗生素耐药性中的作用。为了弥补这一知识差距,我们采用了一项全面的调查,包括序列,结构,分子对接和动态分析,以阐明这两个亚类抗生素耐药谱的机制方法。我们的序列和结构研究揭示了差异,特别是在插入、结构对齐和环区,包括ω环和活性位点附近的环。分子对接研究表明,A2亚类代表的活性位点空腔中较大的底物结合效果较好。动态分析进一步证实了我们的发现,采用均方根偏差(RMSD)、均方根波动(RMSF)、延伸环和ω环的灵活性、旋转半径(Rg)、溶剂可及表面积(SASA)、聚类、氢键模式、主成分分析(PCA)和自由能景观(FEL)。该研究提供了这些亚类的分子特征和耐药机制的见解,为进一步研究抗生素耐药性和加强新的治疗策略铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic insights into ESBL activity of subclass A2 in Class A beta-lactamase revealing a distinct strategy towards conferring drug resistance.

The twenty first century has witnessed challenges with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emerging as a critical global threat. Among its most concerning is antibiotic resistance (ABR), highly linked to beta-lactamases. Among others, Class A beta-lactamases, present significantly with functional diversity, although ESBLs are one of the major concerns. A key defence mechanism in Gram-negative bacteria is the overexpression of ESBLs (Extended spectrum beta-lactamases) which spread across the bacterial population through horizontal gene transfer causes serious nosocomial infections. Since ESBLs have developed to increase their substrate specificity and hydrolyse most cephalosporins, penicillins, and monobactams, research into them is urgently needed.However, despite attempts functional classification, based on sequence identity, fold similarity, the presence or absence of insertions, particularly in loop regions and mode of action, a universally accepted framework remains elusive. Previous studies have broadly categorized Class A beta-lactamases into subclasses A1 and A2, yet the mechanistic intricacies of subclass A2 only as ESBL demand a more nuanced, multilevel analysis, underlying their role in antibiotic resistance. To bridge this knowledge gap, we employed on a comprehensive investigation encompassing sequence, structure, molecular docking, and dynamic analyses to elucidate the mechanistic approach of antibiotic resistance profiles for these two subclasses. Our sequence and structural studies revealed differences, particularly in insertions, structural alignments, and loop regions, including the omega loop and loops near the active site. Molecular docking study demonstrated better binding of the bigger substrate in the active site cavity of A2 subclass representatives. Dynamic analyses further confirmed our findings, employing root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), flexibility of the extended and omega loops, radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), clustering, hydrogen bonding patterns, principal component analysis (PCA), and free energy landscape (FEL). This study provides insights into the molecular distinctions and resistance mechanisms of these subclasses, paving the way for advanced research in antibiotic resistance and strengthening novel therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics
Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
597
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics welcomes manuscripts on biological structure, dynamics, interactions and expression. The Journal is one of the leading publications in high end computational science, atomic structural biology, bioinformatics, virtual drug design, genomics and biological networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信