探讨护士对胸骨伤口感染的认识。

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000583
Danielle Ramsey, Jennifer Withall, Kasey Jackman
{"title":"探讨护士对胸骨伤口感染的认识。","authors":"Danielle Ramsey, Jennifer Withall, Kasey Jackman","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are a serious risk following medial sternotomy, occurring in 3-8% of cases. Despite stringent infection control measures, these infections can lead to extended hospital stays and frequent readmissions. Early SWI detection is essential, underscoring the need for nurses to understand SWI risk factors and management. To evaluate knowledge of SWIs, including associated risk factors and evidence-based management practices, among nurses with varying levels of experience in a cardiothoracic step-down unit (CTSDU). An anonymous survey, including case-based questions and open-ended responses, was distributed to CTSDU nurses from April to May 2023. Nurses were grouped based on experience (≤3 years or ≥4 years), and data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of 61 nurses, 33 completed the survey. Correct SWI risk identification rates were 77%, 21%, and 46%, while correct identification of individual risk factors was 63%, 54%, and 62% across 3 case studies. Cohen's d values were 0.809, 0.296, and 0.07. No significant confidence difference was found between experience levels (P = 0.065). Variability in SWI knowledge across experience levels highlights the need for standardized training to enhance SWI detection and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"48 4","pages":"419-428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Nurses' Understanding of Sternal Wound Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Ramsey, Jennifer Withall, Kasey Jackman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are a serious risk following medial sternotomy, occurring in 3-8% of cases. Despite stringent infection control measures, these infections can lead to extended hospital stays and frequent readmissions. Early SWI detection is essential, underscoring the need for nurses to understand SWI risk factors and management. To evaluate knowledge of SWIs, including associated risk factors and evidence-based management practices, among nurses with varying levels of experience in a cardiothoracic step-down unit (CTSDU). An anonymous survey, including case-based questions and open-ended responses, was distributed to CTSDU nurses from April to May 2023. Nurses were grouped based on experience (≤3 years or ≥4 years), and data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of 61 nurses, 33 completed the survey. Correct SWI risk identification rates were 77%, 21%, and 46%, while correct identification of individual risk factors was 63%, 54%, and 62% across 3 case studies. Cohen's d values were 0.809, 0.296, and 0.07. No significant confidence difference was found between experience levels (P = 0.065). Variability in SWI knowledge across experience levels highlights the need for standardized training to enhance SWI detection and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"419-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸骨伤口感染(SWIs)是内侧胸骨切开术后的严重风险,发生在3-8%的病例中。尽管采取了严格的感染控制措施,但这些感染可导致延长住院时间和频繁再入院。早期SWI检测是必不可少的,强调护士需要了解SWI的风险因素和管理。评估在心胸减压病房(CTSDU)具有不同水平经验的护士对SWIs的认识,包括相关的危险因素和循证管理实践。一项匿名调查,包括基于案例的问题和开放式回答,于2023年4月至5月分发给CTSDU护士。根据护理经验(≤3年或≥4年)进行分组,采用描述性统计和推断性统计对数据进行分析。61名护士中,33名完成了调查。正确的SWI风险识别率分别为77%、21%和46%,而正确识别个体风险因素的比例分别为63%、54%和62%。Cohen的d值分别为0.809、0.296和0.07。经验水平间无显著置信度差异(P = 0.065)。不同经验水平的SWI知识的可变性强调了标准化培训的必要性,以提高SWI检测和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Nurses' Understanding of Sternal Wound Infections.

Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are a serious risk following medial sternotomy, occurring in 3-8% of cases. Despite stringent infection control measures, these infections can lead to extended hospital stays and frequent readmissions. Early SWI detection is essential, underscoring the need for nurses to understand SWI risk factors and management. To evaluate knowledge of SWIs, including associated risk factors and evidence-based management practices, among nurses with varying levels of experience in a cardiothoracic step-down unit (CTSDU). An anonymous survey, including case-based questions and open-ended responses, was distributed to CTSDU nurses from April to May 2023. Nurses were grouped based on experience (≤3 years or ≥4 years), and data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Out of 61 nurses, 33 completed the survey. Correct SWI risk identification rates were 77%, 21%, and 46%, while correct identification of individual risk factors was 63%, 54%, and 62% across 3 case studies. Cohen's d values were 0.809, 0.296, and 0.07. No significant confidence difference was found between experience levels (P = 0.065). Variability in SWI knowledge across experience levels highlights the need for standardized training to enhance SWI detection and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信