{"title":"新辅助化疗策略优化老年局部晚期胃癌患者的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Yoshihiko Kakiuchi, Shinji Kuroda, Shunya Hanzawa, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Hajime Kashima, Satoru Kikuchi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Shunsuke Kagawa, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04281-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) is suboptimal, particularly in elderly patients. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced GC has shown promise, data on elderly patients remain limited. Given the considerable physical burden of NAC, optimizing its administration is crucial. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a modified approach for elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 patients with cStage II/III GC who received NAC between November 2015 and December 2023. Additionally, 25 patients aged ≥ 75 years with cStage III who underwent upfront surgery during the same period were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NAC group was divided into non-elderly (< 75 years, n = 27) and elderly (≥ 75 years, n = 11) groups. The elderly group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.016). While all non-elderly patients completed ≤ 3 cycles, more elderly patients underwent 4 cycles (p = 0.0047). However, per-cycles of S-1 (p = 0.0003) and oxaliplatin (p = 0.0018) were lower in the elderly group. Importantly, adverse events and treatment efficacy were comparable between groups. Among patients aged ≥ 75 years, the upfront surgery group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.017) and underwent more frequent distal gastrectomy (p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC can be safely administered to elderly patients by increasing cycles while reducing per-cycle dosage. It may also serve as a viable alternative to upfront surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies for optimizing safety and efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiko Kakiuchi, Shinji Kuroda, Shunya Hanzawa, Nobuhiko Kanaya, Hajime Kashima, Satoru Kikuchi, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Shunsuke Kagawa, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-025-04281-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) is suboptimal, particularly in elderly patients. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced GC has shown promise, data on elderly patients remain limited. Given the considerable physical burden of NAC, optimizing its administration is crucial. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a modified approach for elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 patients with cStage II/III GC who received NAC between November 2015 and December 2023. Additionally, 25 patients aged ≥ 75 years with cStage III who underwent upfront surgery during the same period were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NAC group was divided into non-elderly (< 75 years, n = 27) and elderly (≥ 75 years, n = 11) groups. The elderly group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.016). While all non-elderly patients completed ≤ 3 cycles, more elderly patients underwent 4 cycles (p = 0.0047). However, per-cycles of S-1 (p = 0.0003) and oxaliplatin (p = 0.0018) were lower in the elderly group. Importantly, adverse events and treatment efficacy were comparable between groups. Among patients aged ≥ 75 years, the upfront surgery group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.017) and underwent more frequent distal gastrectomy (p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC can be safely administered to elderly patients by increasing cycles while reducing per-cycle dosage. It may also serve as a viable alternative to upfront surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04281-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04281-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies for optimizing safety and efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
Background: The completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) is suboptimal, particularly in elderly patients. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced GC has shown promise, data on elderly patients remain limited. Given the considerable physical burden of NAC, optimizing its administration is crucial. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a modified approach for elderly patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 patients with cStage II/III GC who received NAC between November 2015 and December 2023. Additionally, 25 patients aged ≥ 75 years with cStage III who underwent upfront surgery during the same period were analyzed.
Results: The NAC group was divided into non-elderly (< 75 years, n = 27) and elderly (≥ 75 years, n = 11) groups. The elderly group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.016). While all non-elderly patients completed ≤ 3 cycles, more elderly patients underwent 4 cycles (p = 0.0047). However, per-cycles of S-1 (p = 0.0003) and oxaliplatin (p = 0.0018) were lower in the elderly group. Importantly, adverse events and treatment efficacy were comparable between groups. Among patients aged ≥ 75 years, the upfront surgery group had poorer ECOG-PS (p = 0.017) and underwent more frequent distal gastrectomy (p = 0.014).
Conclusions: NAC can be safely administered to elderly patients by increasing cycles while reducing per-cycle dosage. It may also serve as a viable alternative to upfront surgery.
期刊介绍:
BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.