德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案后围生期产前胎膜破裂后的产妇发病率。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Danna Ghafir, Emily Fahl, Nancy Ukoh, Han-Yang Chen, Sean C Blackwell, Julie Gutierrez, Irene A Stafford
{"title":"德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案后围生期产前胎膜破裂后的产妇发病率。","authors":"Danna Ghafir, Emily Fahl, Nancy Ukoh, Han-Yang Chen, Sean C Blackwell, Julie Gutierrez, Irene A Stafford","doi":"10.1055/a-2712-5549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Standard practice prior to Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB 8) for those with periviable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) without contraindications to expectant management was to offer termination of pregnancy or expectant management. After SB 8 went into effect, pregnancy termination was only offered for these patients after the development of chorioamnionitis or clinically significant maternal hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of periviable PROM before and after SB 8 in Houston, TX.This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of periviable PROM less than 22 weeks of gestational age before and after SB 8 at three tertiary care hospitals from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023. Our primary outcome was a composite of adverse maternal outcomes: Sepsis, transfusion, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included intraamniotic infection, postpartum hemorrhage, abruption, septic shock, hospital length of stay, time from rupture of membranes to delivery, and neonatal survival.Over the 5-year study period, 161 women met the inclusion criteria (96 pre-SB 8 vs. 65 post-SB8). Approximately half (54%) of those with periviable PROM opted for termination prior to SB8. Post-SB8, women were more likely to develop an adverse outcome (22.9 vs. 35.4%; aRR = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.78), and were more likely to develop sepsis (9.4 vs. 29.2%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.43-6.17). Five neonates survived to hospital discharge post-SB8, and one survived prior to SB8. Additionally, those expectantly managed post-SB8, compared with those expectantly managed pre-SB8, experienced a longer time from rupture of membranes to delivery (6.5 days post [2-14] vs. 3 days pre [1-7.5]), and a higher rate of sepsis (18 post [30.0%] vs. 6 pre [15.0%]).These results provide evidence that periviable PROM alone is a life-threatening condition with a serious risk of maternal harm. Waiting for maternal infection or hemorrhage to develop before offering pregnancy termination increases the risks of serious maternal morbidity. · Pre-SB8, 54% of women with periviable PROM chose termination.. · Increased rates of sepsis were observed post-SB8.. · Longer rupture of membranes to delivery times were observed post-SB8..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Morbidity following Periviable Prelabor Rupture of Membranes after Texas Senate Bill 8.\",\"authors\":\"Danna Ghafir, Emily Fahl, Nancy Ukoh, Han-Yang Chen, Sean C Blackwell, Julie Gutierrez, Irene A Stafford\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2712-5549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Standard practice prior to Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB 8) for those with periviable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) without contraindications to expectant management was to offer termination of pregnancy or expectant management. After SB 8 went into effect, pregnancy termination was only offered for these patients after the development of chorioamnionitis or clinically significant maternal hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of periviable PROM before and after SB 8 in Houston, TX.This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of periviable PROM less than 22 weeks of gestational age before and after SB 8 at three tertiary care hospitals from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023. Our primary outcome was a composite of adverse maternal outcomes: Sepsis, transfusion, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included intraamniotic infection, postpartum hemorrhage, abruption, septic shock, hospital length of stay, time from rupture of membranes to delivery, and neonatal survival.Over the 5-year study period, 161 women met the inclusion criteria (96 pre-SB 8 vs. 65 post-SB8). Approximately half (54%) of those with periviable PROM opted for termination prior to SB8. Post-SB8, women were more likely to develop an adverse outcome (22.9 vs. 35.4%; aRR = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.78), and were more likely to develop sepsis (9.4 vs. 29.2%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.43-6.17). Five neonates survived to hospital discharge post-SB8, and one survived prior to SB8. Additionally, those expectantly managed post-SB8, compared with those expectantly managed pre-SB8, experienced a longer time from rupture of membranes to delivery (6.5 days post [2-14] vs. 3 days pre [1-7.5]), and a higher rate of sepsis (18 post [30.0%] vs. 6 pre [15.0%]).These results provide evidence that periviable PROM alone is a life-threatening condition with a serious risk of maternal harm. Waiting for maternal infection or hemorrhage to develop before offering pregnancy termination increases the risks of serious maternal morbidity. · Pre-SB8, 54% of women with periviable PROM chose termination.. · Increased rates of sepsis were observed post-SB8.. · Longer rupture of membranes to delivery times were observed post-SB8..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2712-5549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2712-5549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德州参议院第8号法案(SB8)之前的标准做法是对那些无禁禁症的围产期胎膜破裂(PROM)提供妊娠终止或妊娠管理。SB8生效后,这些患者只有在出现绒毛膜羊膜炎或临床显著的产妇出血后才会终止妊娠。本研究的目的是比较德克萨斯州休斯敦SB8前后围生期早PROM的产妇结局。本回顾性队列研究比较了2018年1月1日至2023年3月31日三家三级医院SB8前后小于22周胎龄的围生期早PROM的结局。我们的主要结局是不良产妇结局的综合:败血症、输血和重症监护病房(ICU)入院。次要结局包括羊膜内感染、产后出血、早剥、感染性休克、住院时间、胎膜破裂至分娩时间和新生儿存活率。在5年的研究期间,161名女性符合纳入标准(96名sb8前和65名sb8后)。大约一半(54%)的患者选择在SB8之前终止妊娠。sb8后,女性更有可能发生不良结果(22.9% vs 35.4%; aRR 1.69, CI 1.03-2.78),更有可能发生败血症(9.4% vs 29.2%; aRR 2.97, CI 1.43-6.17)。5名新生儿在SB8后存活至出院,1名在SB8之前存活。此外,与预期sb8前治疗的患者相比,预期sb8后治疗的患者从胎膜破裂到分娩的时间更长([2-14]后6.5天,[1-7.5]前3天),脓毒症发生率更高([30.0%]后18天,[15.0%]前6天)。这些结果提供证据表明,周围性早破本身是一种危及生命的疾病,具有严重的孕产妇伤害风险。在提供终止妊娠之前等待产妇感染或出血会增加产妇严重发病的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maternal Morbidity following Periviable Prelabor Rupture of Membranes after Texas Senate Bill 8.

Standard practice prior to Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB 8) for those with periviable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) without contraindications to expectant management was to offer termination of pregnancy or expectant management. After SB 8 went into effect, pregnancy termination was only offered for these patients after the development of chorioamnionitis or clinically significant maternal hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to compare maternal outcomes of periviable PROM before and after SB 8 in Houston, TX.This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of periviable PROM less than 22 weeks of gestational age before and after SB 8 at three tertiary care hospitals from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023. Our primary outcome was a composite of adverse maternal outcomes: Sepsis, transfusion, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included intraamniotic infection, postpartum hemorrhage, abruption, septic shock, hospital length of stay, time from rupture of membranes to delivery, and neonatal survival.Over the 5-year study period, 161 women met the inclusion criteria (96 pre-SB 8 vs. 65 post-SB8). Approximately half (54%) of those with periviable PROM opted for termination prior to SB8. Post-SB8, women were more likely to develop an adverse outcome (22.9 vs. 35.4%; aRR = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.78), and were more likely to develop sepsis (9.4 vs. 29.2%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.43-6.17). Five neonates survived to hospital discharge post-SB8, and one survived prior to SB8. Additionally, those expectantly managed post-SB8, compared with those expectantly managed pre-SB8, experienced a longer time from rupture of membranes to delivery (6.5 days post [2-14] vs. 3 days pre [1-7.5]), and a higher rate of sepsis (18 post [30.0%] vs. 6 pre [15.0%]).These results provide evidence that periviable PROM alone is a life-threatening condition with a serious risk of maternal harm. Waiting for maternal infection or hemorrhage to develop before offering pregnancy termination increases the risks of serious maternal morbidity. · Pre-SB8, 54% of women with periviable PROM chose termination.. · Increased rates of sepsis were observed post-SB8.. · Longer rupture of membranes to delivery times were observed post-SB8..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信