棘白菌素与两性霉素脂质体B治疗氟康唑耐药假丝酵母菌傍孢菌病血流感染的比较疗效。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antonio Vena, Claudia Bartalucci, Marco Muccio, Giusy Tiseo, Patricia Muñoz, Mario Cesaretti, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Anna Marchese, Ramona Barbieri, Arianna Forniti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Alessandro Limongelli, Antonella Lupetti, Malgorzata Mikulska, Jon Salmanton-García, Ana Soriano Martín, Lucia Taramasso, Maricela Valerio, Pilar Escribano, Jesus Guinea, Emilio Bouza, Marco Falcone, Matteo Bassetti
{"title":"棘白菌素与两性霉素脂质体B治疗氟康唑耐药假丝酵母菌傍孢菌病血流感染的比较疗效。","authors":"Antonio Vena, Claudia Bartalucci, Marco Muccio, Giusy Tiseo, Patricia Muñoz, Mario Cesaretti, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Anna Marchese, Ramona Barbieri, Arianna Forniti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Alessandro Limongelli, Antonella Lupetti, Malgorzata Mikulska, Jon Salmanton-García, Ana Soriano Martín, Lucia Taramasso, Maricela Valerio, Pilar Escribano, Jesus Guinea, Emilio Bouza, Marco Falcone, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1128/aac.00355-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current therapeutic options for fluconazole-resistant <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> (FLZR-CP) bloodstream infections (BSI) are limited to echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). To the best of our knowledge, no real-world comparative effectiveness studies have assessed these agents. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of echinocandins and L-AmB for the treatment of FLZR-CP BSI. This retrospective, observational study was conducted in two hospitals in Italy between January 2018 and December 2022. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years old) with microbiologically confirmed FLZR-CP BSI who received targeted therapy with either echinocandins or L-AmB. Patients were matched (2:1) based on age, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of sepsis or septic shock, time to appropriate antifungal therapy (≤48 hours or > 48 hours from diagnosis), and infection source. A total of 63 patients were included (42 in the echinocandin group and 21 in the L-AmB group). In Cox regression, targeted therapy with echinocandins was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-5.92, <i>P</i> = 0.645). An exploratory sensitivity analysis including patients who did not receive source control yielded consistent results (<i>P</i> = 0.491). Furthermore, in the multivariable regression analysis, echinocandin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of persistent fungemia (adjusted odds ratio 1.61: 95% CI 0.43-5.99, <i>P</i> = 0.476). Treatment with echinocandins and L-AmB resulted in similar 30-day mortality and persistent fungemia rates in patients with FLZR-CP BSI. These findings confirm that echinocandins are a viable treatment option for <i>C. parapsilosis</i> BSI, even for patients with fluconazole-resistant strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"e0035525"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B for fluconazole-resistant <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> bloodstream infections.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Vena, Claudia Bartalucci, Marco Muccio, Giusy Tiseo, Patricia Muñoz, Mario Cesaretti, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Anna Marchese, Ramona Barbieri, Arianna Forniti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Alessandro Limongelli, Antonella Lupetti, Malgorzata Mikulska, Jon Salmanton-García, Ana Soriano Martín, Lucia Taramasso, Maricela Valerio, Pilar Escribano, Jesus Guinea, Emilio Bouza, Marco Falcone, Matteo Bassetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/aac.00355-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current therapeutic options for fluconazole-resistant <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> (FLZR-CP) bloodstream infections (BSI) are limited to echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). To the best of our knowledge, no real-world comparative effectiveness studies have assessed these agents. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of echinocandins and L-AmB for the treatment of FLZR-CP BSI. This retrospective, observational study was conducted in two hospitals in Italy between January 2018 and December 2022. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years old) with microbiologically confirmed FLZR-CP BSI who received targeted therapy with either echinocandins or L-AmB. Patients were matched (2:1) based on age, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of sepsis or septic shock, time to appropriate antifungal therapy (≤48 hours or > 48 hours from diagnosis), and infection source. A total of 63 patients were included (42 in the echinocandin group and 21 in the L-AmB group). In Cox regression, targeted therapy with echinocandins was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-5.92, <i>P</i> = 0.645). An exploratory sensitivity analysis including patients who did not receive source control yielded consistent results (<i>P</i> = 0.491). Furthermore, in the multivariable regression analysis, echinocandin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of persistent fungemia (adjusted odds ratio 1.61: 95% CI 0.43-5.99, <i>P</i> = 0.476). Treatment with echinocandins and L-AmB resulted in similar 30-day mortality and persistent fungemia rates in patients with FLZR-CP BSI. These findings confirm that echinocandins are a viable treatment option for <i>C. parapsilosis</i> BSI, even for patients with fluconazole-resistant strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0035525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00355-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00355-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前对氟康唑耐药假丝酵母菌旁裂菌病(FLZR-CP)血流感染(BSI)的治疗选择仅限于棘白菌素和脂体两性霉素B (L-AmB)。据我们所知,没有真实世界的比较有效性研究评估过这些药物。本研究旨在比较棘白菌素和L-AmB治疗FLZR-CP BSI的疗效。这项回顾性观察性研究于2018年1月至2022年12月在意大利的两家医院进行。符合条件的患者是微生物学证实的FLZR-CP BSI的成年人(≥18岁),接受了棘白菌素或L-AmB的靶向治疗。患者根据年龄、Charlson合并症指数、是否存在脓毒症或感染性休克、适当的抗真菌治疗时间(诊断后≤48小时或≤48小时)和感染源进行2:1的匹配。共纳入63例患者(棘白菌素组42例,L-AmB组21例)。在Cox回归中,棘白菌素靶向治疗与死亡率增加无关(校正风险比1.40;95%可信区间[CI] 0.33-5.92, P = 0.645)。探索性敏感性分析包括未接受源控制的患者,结果一致(P = 0.491)。此外,在多变量回归分析中,棘白菌素治疗与持续性真菌血症风险增加无关(校正优势比1.61:95% CI 0.43-5.99, P = 0.476)。用棘白菌素和L-AmB治疗FLZR-CP BSI患者的30天死亡率和持续真菌血症率相似。这些发现证实棘球白菌素是一种可行的治疗方案,即使是对氟康唑耐药菌株的患者也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B for fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections.

Current therapeutic options for fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis (FLZR-CP) bloodstream infections (BSI) are limited to echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB). To the best of our knowledge, no real-world comparative effectiveness studies have assessed these agents. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of echinocandins and L-AmB for the treatment of FLZR-CP BSI. This retrospective, observational study was conducted in two hospitals in Italy between January 2018 and December 2022. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years old) with microbiologically confirmed FLZR-CP BSI who received targeted therapy with either echinocandins or L-AmB. Patients were matched (2:1) based on age, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of sepsis or septic shock, time to appropriate antifungal therapy (≤48 hours or > 48 hours from diagnosis), and infection source. A total of 63 patients were included (42 in the echinocandin group and 21 in the L-AmB group). In Cox regression, targeted therapy with echinocandins was not associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-5.92, P = 0.645). An exploratory sensitivity analysis including patients who did not receive source control yielded consistent results (P = 0.491). Furthermore, in the multivariable regression analysis, echinocandin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of persistent fungemia (adjusted odds ratio 1.61: 95% CI 0.43-5.99, P = 0.476). Treatment with echinocandins and L-AmB resulted in similar 30-day mortality and persistent fungemia rates in patients with FLZR-CP BSI. These findings confirm that echinocandins are a viable treatment option for C. parapsilosis BSI, even for patients with fluconazole-resistant strains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信