Katharina M. Busl, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Jan Claassen, Raimund Helbok, Jose Javier Provencio, Chiara Robba, Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, Stefan Wolf, Eliza R. Zanier, Giuseppe Citerio
{"title":"出血以外:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的并发症。病理生理学,临床意义和管理策略:综述","authors":"Katharina M. Busl, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Jan Claassen, Raimund Helbok, Jose Javier Provencio, Chiara Robba, Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, Stefan Wolf, Eliza R. Zanier, Giuseppe Citerio","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05640-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a critical condition with high case-fatality and lasting impacts on survivors. Acute events that are the direct result of aneurysm rupture, such as acute ischemia, elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, seizures, and hydrocephalus, lead to early brain injury. A delayed cascade of processes, including a prominent systemic inflammatory response, may lead to secondary brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia, which often further impairs recovery. Systemic complications, including cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction, fever, and electrolyte imbalances, arise in the interplay between early and secondary brain injury and challenge the clinical course. Early management focuses on the prevention of rebleeding mainly through aneurysm securement, amelioration of early brain injury through cerebrospinal fluid drainage, control of intracranial pressure, and organ support to avoid or attenuate secondary brain injury. Nimodipine remains the only pharmacological agent shown to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia, and lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid to reduce subarachnoid blood may improve outcome. Management strategies for hemodynamic interventions, seizures, intracranial pressure control, large artery vasospasm, and electrolytes remain consensus-based and with large variation in practice. Several advances in understanding inflammation and delayed cerebral ischemia, as well as in monitoring and interventions hold promise, but robust trials are needed to refine protocols and improve patient recovery. Understanding and mitigating the cascade of damage from rupture to recovery is essential to reduce the burden of this devastating condition. In this review, we appraise the current understanding of the pathophysiology of post-rupture complications as well as scientific and management data, with a focus on recent advances.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the bleed: complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies: a review\",\"authors\":\"Katharina M. Busl, Elisa Gouvea Bogossian, Jan Claassen, Raimund Helbok, Jose Javier Provencio, Chiara Robba, Mervyn D. I. Vergouwen, Stefan Wolf, Eliza R. Zanier, Giuseppe Citerio\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05640-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a critical condition with high case-fatality and lasting impacts on survivors. Acute events that are the direct result of aneurysm rupture, such as acute ischemia, elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, seizures, and hydrocephalus, lead to early brain injury. A delayed cascade of processes, including a prominent systemic inflammatory response, may lead to secondary brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia, which often further impairs recovery. Systemic complications, including cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction, fever, and electrolyte imbalances, arise in the interplay between early and secondary brain injury and challenge the clinical course. Early management focuses on the prevention of rebleeding mainly through aneurysm securement, amelioration of early brain injury through cerebrospinal fluid drainage, control of intracranial pressure, and organ support to avoid or attenuate secondary brain injury. Nimodipine remains the only pharmacological agent shown to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia, and lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid to reduce subarachnoid blood may improve outcome. Management strategies for hemodynamic interventions, seizures, intracranial pressure control, large artery vasospasm, and electrolytes remain consensus-based and with large variation in practice. Several advances in understanding inflammation and delayed cerebral ischemia, as well as in monitoring and interventions hold promise, but robust trials are needed to refine protocols and improve patient recovery. Understanding and mitigating the cascade of damage from rupture to recovery is essential to reduce the burden of this devastating condition. In this review, we appraise the current understanding of the pathophysiology of post-rupture complications as well as scientific and management data, with a focus on recent advances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05640-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05640-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond the bleed: complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies: a review
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a critical condition with high case-fatality and lasting impacts on survivors. Acute events that are the direct result of aneurysm rupture, such as acute ischemia, elevated intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, seizures, and hydrocephalus, lead to early brain injury. A delayed cascade of processes, including a prominent systemic inflammatory response, may lead to secondary brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia, which often further impairs recovery. Systemic complications, including cardiac and pulmonary dysfunction, fever, and electrolyte imbalances, arise in the interplay between early and secondary brain injury and challenge the clinical course. Early management focuses on the prevention of rebleeding mainly through aneurysm securement, amelioration of early brain injury through cerebrospinal fluid drainage, control of intracranial pressure, and organ support to avoid or attenuate secondary brain injury. Nimodipine remains the only pharmacological agent shown to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia, and lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid to reduce subarachnoid blood may improve outcome. Management strategies for hemodynamic interventions, seizures, intracranial pressure control, large artery vasospasm, and electrolytes remain consensus-based and with large variation in practice. Several advances in understanding inflammation and delayed cerebral ischemia, as well as in monitoring and interventions hold promise, but robust trials are needed to refine protocols and improve patient recovery. Understanding and mitigating the cascade of damage from rupture to recovery is essential to reduce the burden of this devastating condition. In this review, we appraise the current understanding of the pathophysiology of post-rupture complications as well as scientific and management data, with a focus on recent advances.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.