巴西伯南布哥州COVID - 19期间堕胎态度灵活性的证据

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Brooke Whitfield, Raquel Zanatta Coutinho, Leticia Marteleto
{"title":"巴西伯南布哥州COVID - 19期间堕胎态度灵活性的证据","authors":"Brooke Whitfield, Raquel Zanatta Coutinho, Leticia Marteleto","doi":"10.1111/sifp.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines changes in women's attitudes toward abortion in Brazil during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic, focusing on the role of religious affiliation. Brazil provides a unique context for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, and back‐to‐back Zika and COVID‐19 crises. We used data from a population‐based sample of 2335 women ages 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic (May–September 2020) and one year later (May–September 2021). Multivariable‐adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess changes in support for abortion in cases of maternal Zika or COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy. Women were less supportive of abortion in the case of maternal COVID‐19 infection (34 percent) compared to Zika infection (41 percent). About half of the women changed their abortion attitudes during the year. Pentecostal Evangelicals were more likely to decrease support, while nonreligious women or those with less conservative affiliations were more likely to increase support. Greater worry about Zika and COVID‐19 was associated with higher support for abortion. The study highlights the dynamic nature of abortion attitudes, which should be considered when forming policies, especially during crises.","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence of Abortion Attitude Flexibility during COVID‐19 in Pernambuco, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Whitfield, Raquel Zanatta Coutinho, Leticia Marteleto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sifp.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines changes in women's attitudes toward abortion in Brazil during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic, focusing on the role of religious affiliation. Brazil provides a unique context for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, and back‐to‐back Zika and COVID‐19 crises. We used data from a population‐based sample of 2335 women ages 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic (May–September 2020) and one year later (May–September 2021). Multivariable‐adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess changes in support for abortion in cases of maternal Zika or COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy. Women were less supportive of abortion in the case of maternal COVID‐19 infection (34 percent) compared to Zika infection (41 percent). About half of the women changed their abortion attitudes during the year. Pentecostal Evangelicals were more likely to decrease support, while nonreligious women or those with less conservative affiliations were more likely to increase support. Greater worry about Zika and COVID‐19 was associated with higher support for abortion. The study highlights the dynamic nature of abortion attitudes, which should be considered when forming policies, especially during crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Family Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了在COVID - 19大流行的第一年,巴西妇女对堕胎态度的变化,重点关注宗教信仰的作用。由于严格的堕胎政策、不断变化的宗教景观以及接连发生的寨卡病毒和COVID - 19危机,巴西为审视堕胎态度提供了一个独特的背景。我们使用的数据来自巴西伯南布哥省2335名年龄在18-34岁的女性,这些数据是在COVID - 19大流行开始期间(2020年5月至9月)和一年后(2021年5月至9月)收集的。使用多变量调整的多项逻辑回归模型来评估孕妇在怀孕期间感染寨卡病毒或COVID - 19感染时对堕胎的支持变化。与寨卡病毒感染(41%)相比,母亲感染COVID - 19(34%)的妇女更不支持堕胎。在这一年中,大约一半的妇女改变了对堕胎的态度。五旬节派福音派更有可能减少支持,而不信教的女性或不那么保守的女性更有可能增加支持。对寨卡病毒和COVID - 19的担忧越大,对堕胎的支持就越高。该研究强调了堕胎态度的动态性质,在制定政策时应考虑到这一点,特别是在危机期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence of Abortion Attitude Flexibility during COVID‐19 in Pernambuco, Brazil
This study examines changes in women's attitudes toward abortion in Brazil during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic, focusing on the role of religious affiliation. Brazil provides a unique context for examining abortion attitudes because of its strict abortion policies, changing religious landscape, and back‐to‐back Zika and COVID‐19 crises. We used data from a population‐based sample of 2335 women ages 18–34 in Pernambuco, Brazil, collected during the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic (May–September 2020) and one year later (May–September 2021). Multivariable‐adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess changes in support for abortion in cases of maternal Zika or COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy. Women were less supportive of abortion in the case of maternal COVID‐19 infection (34 percent) compared to Zika infection (41 percent). About half of the women changed their abortion attitudes during the year. Pentecostal Evangelicals were more likely to decrease support, while nonreligious women or those with less conservative affiliations were more likely to increase support. Greater worry about Zika and COVID‐19 was associated with higher support for abortion. The study highlights the dynamic nature of abortion attitudes, which should be considered when forming policies, especially during crises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信