David J Zorko, Jennifer A Klowak, Michael Vu, Yen-Mei Z Mayer, Alexandra Pysklywec, Kimberley Lewis, Karen Choong
{"title":"右美托咪定在危重症机械通气儿童中的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"David J Zorko, Jennifer A Klowak, Michael Vu, Yen-Mei Z Mayer, Alexandra Pysklywec, Kimberley Lewis, Karen Choong","doi":"10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dexmedetomidine is an increasingly popular analgosedative in critically ill children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared to other analgosedatives in this population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Seven electronic databases and trial registries to July 2024, without language restrictions.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine to other analgosedatives in critically ill children receiving IMV.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Independently and in duplicate, we conducted data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, calculating pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 trials (<i>n</i> = 592 patients). Pooled analyses demonstrated dexmedetomidine has little to no effect on IMV duration (MD -2.2 h [-3.3, -1.1]; moderate certainty), clinically important bradycardia (RR 1.42 [0.45, 4.49]; moderate certainty), or clinically important hypotension (RR 1.35 [0.48, 3.82]; moderate certainty). Dexmedetomidine may reduce delirium risk (RR 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]; low certainty), but impact on withdrawal is uncertain (RR 0.93 [0.55, 1.59]; very low certainty). A narrative synthesis was used to evaluate dexmedetomidine sedation efficacy, demonstrating very low certainty in attaining sedation target. One trial reported on long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twelve trials evaluating dexmedetomidine have been conducted to date, with low or very low certainty for its impact upon delirium, withdrawal, and long-term outcomes. Future analgosedation trials require attention to intervention design, outcome selection and reporting to improve certainty in critical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":73402,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","volume":"3 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of analgosedation with dexmedetomidine in critically ill mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"David J Zorko, Jennifer A Klowak, Michael Vu, Yen-Mei Z Mayer, Alexandra Pysklywec, Kimberley Lewis, Karen Choong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dexmedetomidine is an increasingly popular analgosedative in critically ill children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared to other analgosedatives in this population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Seven electronic databases and trial registries to July 2024, without language restrictions.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine to other analgosedatives in critically ill children receiving IMV.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Independently and in duplicate, we conducted data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, calculating pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 trials (<i>n</i> = 592 patients). Pooled analyses demonstrated dexmedetomidine has little to no effect on IMV duration (MD -2.2 h [-3.3, -1.1]; moderate certainty), clinically important bradycardia (RR 1.42 [0.45, 4.49]; moderate certainty), or clinically important hypotension (RR 1.35 [0.48, 3.82]; moderate certainty). Dexmedetomidine may reduce delirium risk (RR 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]; low certainty), but impact on withdrawal is uncertain (RR 0.93 [0.55, 1.59]; very low certainty). A narrative synthesis was used to evaluate dexmedetomidine sedation efficacy, demonstrating very low certainty in attaining sedation target. One trial reported on long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twelve trials evaluating dexmedetomidine have been conducted to date, with low or very low certainty for its impact upon delirium, withdrawal, and long-term outcomes. Future analgosedation trials require attention to intervention design, outcome selection and reporting to improve certainty in critical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of analgosedation with dexmedetomidine in critically ill mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Objective: Dexmedetomidine is an increasingly popular analgosedative in critically ill children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared to other analgosedatives in this population.
Data sources: Seven electronic databases and trial registries to July 2024, without language restrictions.
Study selection: Randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine to other analgosedatives in critically ill children receiving IMV.
Data extraction and synthesis: Independently and in duplicate, we conducted data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and certainty assessment using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, calculating pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: We identified 12 trials (n = 592 patients). Pooled analyses demonstrated dexmedetomidine has little to no effect on IMV duration (MD -2.2 h [-3.3, -1.1]; moderate certainty), clinically important bradycardia (RR 1.42 [0.45, 4.49]; moderate certainty), or clinically important hypotension (RR 1.35 [0.48, 3.82]; moderate certainty). Dexmedetomidine may reduce delirium risk (RR 0.83 [0.64, 1.07]; low certainty), but impact on withdrawal is uncertain (RR 0.93 [0.55, 1.59]; very low certainty). A narrative synthesis was used to evaluate dexmedetomidine sedation efficacy, demonstrating very low certainty in attaining sedation target. One trial reported on long-term outcomes.
Conclusions: Twelve trials evaluating dexmedetomidine have been conducted to date, with low or very low certainty for its impact upon delirium, withdrawal, and long-term outcomes. Future analgosedation trials require attention to intervention design, outcome selection and reporting to improve certainty in critical outcomes.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-025-00091-4.