Lian Qiong, Li Qingyi, Guo Bohong, Hao YouCheng, Liu Qiangzhao
{"title":"5- α还原酶抑制剂对PI-RADS评分和前列腺癌检测的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Lian Qiong, Li Qingyi, Guo Bohong, Hao YouCheng, Liu Qiangzhao","doi":"10.1002/pros.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) tumor classifications and prostate cancer (PCa) detection were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by evaluating published studies examining the influence of 5-ARIs on PI-RADS lesions and PCa detection. The Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases were accessed for relevant study retrieval. Statistical analyses were performed through the use of STATA v.16.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, comprising 12,132 participants, were included. Compared to men who had not received 5-ARIs, those exposed to 5-ARIs exhibited no significant differences in PCa diagnosis (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.08; p = 0.55) or clinically significant PCa (csPCa) diagnosis (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.16; p = 0.85). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that 5-ARI-exposed men had comparable PCa diagnosis in PI-RADS 3 (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12; p = 0.25), PI-RADS 4 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.21; p = 0.84), and PI-RADS 5 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26; p = 0.87) groups relative to 5-ARI-naïve men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that 5-ARIs do not significantly alter PI-RADS lesion distribution or impact PCa and csPCa diagnosis. Consequently, exposure to 5-ARIs should not influence MRI-based diagnostic approaches in patients with suspected PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors on PI-RADS Scores and Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lian Qiong, Li Qingyi, Guo Bohong, Hao YouCheng, Liu Qiangzhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) tumor classifications and prostate cancer (PCa) detection were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by evaluating published studies examining the influence of 5-ARIs on PI-RADS lesions and PCa detection. The Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases were accessed for relevant study retrieval. Statistical analyses were performed through the use of STATA v.16.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, comprising 12,132 participants, were included. Compared to men who had not received 5-ARIs, those exposed to 5-ARIs exhibited no significant differences in PCa diagnosis (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.08; p = 0.55) or clinically significant PCa (csPCa) diagnosis (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.16; p = 0.85). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that 5-ARI-exposed men had comparable PCa diagnosis in PI-RADS 3 (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12; p = 0.25), PI-RADS 4 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.21; p = 0.84), and PI-RADS 5 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26; p = 0.87) groups relative to 5-ARI-naïve men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that 5-ARIs do not significantly alter PI-RADS lesion distribution or impact PCa and csPCa diagnosis. Consequently, exposure to 5-ARIs should not influence MRI-based diagnostic approaches in patients with suspected PCa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:综述并分析5- α还原酶抑制剂(5-ARIs)对前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)肿瘤分类和前列腺癌(PCa)检测的影响。方法:通过评估已发表的研究,对5-ARIs对PI-RADS病变和PCa检测的影响进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析。通过Web of Science、PubMed和Embase数据库进行相关研究检索。使用STATA v.16.0进行统计分析。结果:纳入了7项研究,包括12132名参与者。与未接受5-ARIs治疗的男性相比,接受5-ARIs治疗的男性在PCa诊断(OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.08; p = 0.55)或临床意义显著的PCa (csPCa)诊断(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.16; p = 0.85)方面无显著差异。进一步的亚组分析表明,与5-ARI-naïve男性相比,5- ari暴露的男性在PI-RADS 3组(OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12; p = 0.25)、PI-RADS 4组(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.21; p = 0.84)和PI-RADS 5组(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26; p = 0.87)的PCa诊断具有可比性。结论:这些发现表明5-ARIs不会显著改变PI-RADS病变分布或影响PCa和csPCa的诊断。因此,在疑似PCa患者中,暴露于5-ARIs不应影响基于mri的诊断方法。
Influence of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors on PI-RADS Scores and Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: The impact of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) tumor classifications and prostate cancer (PCa) detection were reviewed and analyzed.
Method: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by evaluating published studies examining the influence of 5-ARIs on PI-RADS lesions and PCa detection. The Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases were accessed for relevant study retrieval. Statistical analyses were performed through the use of STATA v.16.0.
Results: Seven studies, comprising 12,132 participants, were included. Compared to men who had not received 5-ARIs, those exposed to 5-ARIs exhibited no significant differences in PCa diagnosis (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.08; p = 0.55) or clinically significant PCa (csPCa) diagnosis (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.16; p = 0.85). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that 5-ARI-exposed men had comparable PCa diagnosis in PI-RADS 3 (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.12; p = 0.25), PI-RADS 4 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85-1.21; p = 0.84), and PI-RADS 5 (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.26; p = 0.87) groups relative to 5-ARI-naïve men.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that 5-ARIs do not significantly alter PI-RADS lesion distribution or impact PCa and csPCa diagnosis. Consequently, exposure to 5-ARIs should not influence MRI-based diagnostic approaches in patients with suspected PCa.
期刊介绍:
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.