我的内心晴雨表:痴呆评估量表(EmDAS)中具身认知发展的探索性合作研究

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hanne Mette Ridder, Janni Lund Hansen, Charlotte Lindvang, Lukas Ochsner Reynaud Ridder
{"title":"我的内心晴雨表:痴呆评估量表(EmDAS)中具身认知发展的探索性合作研究","authors":"Hanne Mette Ridder, Janni Lund Hansen, Charlotte Lindvang, Lukas Ochsner Reynaud Ridder","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When psychosocial interventions for persons with dementia are examined, standardized screening tools are often used. These tools are designed to quantify symptom reduction and may therefore overlook the changes and benefits that persons with dementia themselves find important. This addresses the need for tools that are developed from the perspective of persons with dementia themselves in order to integrate the nuanced benefits of psychosocial interventions that they value. There are conflicting results about whether persons with dementia can complete self-report scales, still, the aim of this study was to outline the detailed process of the development of a dementia-specific self-reported outcome measure. The research was motivated by a person with dementia and unfolded in an inductive, iterative and explorative co-research design in seven phases. Each phase covered different research methods and in total included 36 participants and stakeholders. The participants' perspectives and ideas were prioritized with the overall goal to enhance and improve outcomes for psychosocial interventions that are co-created and balanced between deficits and strengths and based on what persons with dementia considered the most meaningful outcomes. The result was a co-constructed self-report outcome measure covering eight items of embodied cognition (Body, Emotions, Language, Overview, Empathy, Memory, Imagination, Meaning). The Embodied Cognition in Dementia Assessment Scales (EmDAS) shows promising validity and sensitivity, is relevant for further psychometric testing, and may provide a valuable contribution to inclusive health care research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"My inner barometer: an explorative co-research study on the development of the embodied cognition in dementia assessment scales (EmDAS).\",\"authors\":\"Hanne Mette Ridder, Janni Lund Hansen, Charlotte Lindvang, Lukas Ochsner Reynaud Ridder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2565513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When psychosocial interventions for persons with dementia are examined, standardized screening tools are often used. These tools are designed to quantify symptom reduction and may therefore overlook the changes and benefits that persons with dementia themselves find important. This addresses the need for tools that are developed from the perspective of persons with dementia themselves in order to integrate the nuanced benefits of psychosocial interventions that they value. There are conflicting results about whether persons with dementia can complete self-report scales, still, the aim of this study was to outline the detailed process of the development of a dementia-specific self-reported outcome measure. The research was motivated by a person with dementia and unfolded in an inductive, iterative and explorative co-research design in seven phases. Each phase covered different research methods and in total included 36 participants and stakeholders. The participants' perspectives and ideas were prioritized with the overall goal to enhance and improve outcomes for psychosocial interventions that are co-created and balanced between deficits and strengths and based on what persons with dementia considered the most meaningful outcomes. The result was a co-constructed self-report outcome measure covering eight items of embodied cognition (Body, Emotions, Language, Overview, Empathy, Memory, Imagination, Meaning). The Embodied Cognition in Dementia Assessment Scales (EmDAS) shows promising validity and sensitivity, is relevant for further psychometric testing, and may provide a valuable contribution to inclusive health care research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565513\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2565513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在检查痴呆症患者的社会心理干预措施时,通常使用标准化筛查工具。这些工具旨在量化症状减轻,因此可能忽略了痴呆症患者自己认为重要的变化和益处。这解决了从痴呆症患者自身角度开发工具的需求,以便整合他们所重视的社会心理干预的细微益处。关于痴呆症患者是否可以完成自我报告量表,目前的结果存在矛盾,尽管如此,本研究的目的是概述开发痴呆症特异性自我报告结果测量的详细过程。该研究由一位痴呆症患者发起,并以归纳、迭代和探索性的共同研究设计展开,共分七个阶段。每个阶段涵盖不同的研究方法,共有36名参与者和利益相关者。参与者的观点和想法被优先考虑,其总体目标是加强和改善共同创造的社会心理干预的结果,并在缺陷和优势之间取得平衡,并基于痴呆症患者认为最有意义的结果。结果是一个共同构建的自我报告结果测量,包括八个项目的具身认知(身体,情绪,语言,概述,移情,记忆,想象,意义)。痴呆评估量表(EmDAS)显示出良好的有效性和敏感性,与进一步的心理测量测试相关,并可能为包容性卫生保健研究提供有价值的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
My inner barometer: an explorative co-research study on the development of the embodied cognition in dementia assessment scales (EmDAS).

When psychosocial interventions for persons with dementia are examined, standardized screening tools are often used. These tools are designed to quantify symptom reduction and may therefore overlook the changes and benefits that persons with dementia themselves find important. This addresses the need for tools that are developed from the perspective of persons with dementia themselves in order to integrate the nuanced benefits of psychosocial interventions that they value. There are conflicting results about whether persons with dementia can complete self-report scales, still, the aim of this study was to outline the detailed process of the development of a dementia-specific self-reported outcome measure. The research was motivated by a person with dementia and unfolded in an inductive, iterative and explorative co-research design in seven phases. Each phase covered different research methods and in total included 36 participants and stakeholders. The participants' perspectives and ideas were prioritized with the overall goal to enhance and improve outcomes for psychosocial interventions that are co-created and balanced between deficits and strengths and based on what persons with dementia considered the most meaningful outcomes. The result was a co-constructed self-report outcome measure covering eight items of embodied cognition (Body, Emotions, Language, Overview, Empathy, Memory, Imagination, Meaning). The Embodied Cognition in Dementia Assessment Scales (EmDAS) shows promising validity and sensitivity, is relevant for further psychometric testing, and may provide a valuable contribution to inclusive health care research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology Health & Medicine
Psychology Health & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management. For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信