在门诊护理机构中,支付方式是否激励不健康酒精使用筛查?来自美国国家门诊医疗调查的证据。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aryn Z Phillips, SunJung Yoon
{"title":"在门诊护理机构中,支付方式是否激励不健康酒精使用筛查?来自美国国家门诊医疗调查的证据。","authors":"Aryn Z Phillips, SunJung Yoon","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09965-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite recommendations, screening for unhealthy alcohol use occurs infrequently in US ambulatory care. One barrier to screening often cited by physicians is misalignment of incentives, but it is unclear which financial arrangements contribute to or alleviate this misalignment. This analysis investigates how determinants of income-both patient care revenue and physician remuneration-encourage or discourage guideline-concordant alcohol screening. Cross-sectional data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019 are pooled. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression is used to estimate associations between alcohol screening during visits and variables capturing methods of patient care revenue generation and of physician remuneration. Methods of revenue generation include receipt of revenue from capitation and Medicaid. Methods of physician remuneration include payment by share of practice billings, consideration of productivity and patient satisfaction in determining compensation, and practice ownership. Of 10,607 visits under study, fewer than 3% included screening. In the adjusted model, visits to physicians who received > 25% of patient revenue from capitated payments had higher odds of including screening (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.33, 15.13) compared with visits to physicians who received less from capitation, as did visits to physicians for whom patient satisfaction surveys impacted compensation (aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.51, 8.37). Payment methods that reward value (e.g., capitation) and patient-centered outcomes (e.g., patient satisfaction), rather than productivity, may promote alcohol screening in US ambulatory care. However, the low rates of screening observed suggest transitioning towards such methods will not be sufficient to achieve optimal screening rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Payment Methods Incentivize Screening for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Ambulatory Care Settings? Evidence from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Aryn Z Phillips, SunJung Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-025-09965-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite recommendations, screening for unhealthy alcohol use occurs infrequently in US ambulatory care. One barrier to screening often cited by physicians is misalignment of incentives, but it is unclear which financial arrangements contribute to or alleviate this misalignment. This analysis investigates how determinants of income-both patient care revenue and physician remuneration-encourage or discourage guideline-concordant alcohol screening. Cross-sectional data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019 are pooled. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression is used to estimate associations between alcohol screening during visits and variables capturing methods of patient care revenue generation and of physician remuneration. Methods of revenue generation include receipt of revenue from capitation and Medicaid. Methods of physician remuneration include payment by share of practice billings, consideration of productivity and patient satisfaction in determining compensation, and practice ownership. Of 10,607 visits under study, fewer than 3% included screening. In the adjusted model, visits to physicians who received > 25% of patient revenue from capitated payments had higher odds of including screening (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.33, 15.13) compared with visits to physicians who received less from capitation, as did visits to physicians for whom patient satisfaction surveys impacted compensation (aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.51, 8.37). Payment methods that reward value (e.g., capitation) and patient-centered outcomes (e.g., patient satisfaction), rather than productivity, may promote alcohol screening in US ambulatory care. However, the low rates of screening observed suggest transitioning towards such methods will not be sufficient to achieve optimal screening rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09965-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09965-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有这样的建议,但在美国的门诊护理中,不健康饮酒的筛查很少发生。医生经常提到的筛查的一个障碍是激励措施的不一致,但目前尚不清楚哪些财务安排有助于或减轻这种不一致。本分析调查了收入的决定因素——病人护理收入和医生报酬——是如何鼓励或阻碍指导方针一致的酒精筛查的。汇总了2015年、2016年、2018年和2019年美国国家门诊医疗调查的横截面数据。使用协变量调整逻辑回归来估计就诊期间酒精筛查与患者护理收入和医生报酬的变量捕获方法之间的关联。收入产生的方法包括从人头分配和医疗补助中获得收入。医生报酬的方法包括按执业账单的份额支付,在确定报酬时考虑生产力和患者满意度,以及执业所有权。在10607次就诊中,包括筛查的不到3%。在调整后的模型中,从资本支付中获得患者收入的25%的医生就诊,包括筛查的几率更高(调整后的优势比(aOR) = 5.94;95%可信区间(CI) = 2.33, 15.13),患者满意度调查对薪酬有影响的医生的访视情况也是如此(aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.51, 8.37)。奖励价值(例如,人头)和以患者为中心的结果(例如,患者满意度)的支付方式,而不是生产力,可能会促进美国门诊医疗中的酒精筛查。然而,观察到的低筛查率表明,过渡到这种方法将不足以达到最佳筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Payment Methods Incentivize Screening for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Ambulatory Care Settings? Evidence from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Despite recommendations, screening for unhealthy alcohol use occurs infrequently in US ambulatory care. One barrier to screening often cited by physicians is misalignment of incentives, but it is unclear which financial arrangements contribute to or alleviate this misalignment. This analysis investigates how determinants of income-both patient care revenue and physician remuneration-encourage or discourage guideline-concordant alcohol screening. Cross-sectional data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019 are pooled. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression is used to estimate associations between alcohol screening during visits and variables capturing methods of patient care revenue generation and of physician remuneration. Methods of revenue generation include receipt of revenue from capitation and Medicaid. Methods of physician remuneration include payment by share of practice billings, consideration of productivity and patient satisfaction in determining compensation, and practice ownership. Of 10,607 visits under study, fewer than 3% included screening. In the adjusted model, visits to physicians who received > 25% of patient revenue from capitated payments had higher odds of including screening (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.33, 15.13) compared with visits to physicians who received less from capitation, as did visits to physicians for whom patient satisfaction surveys impacted compensation (aOR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.51, 8.37). Payment methods that reward value (e.g., capitation) and patient-centered outcomes (e.g., patient satisfaction), rather than productivity, may promote alcohol screening in US ambulatory care. However, the low rates of screening observed suggest transitioning towards such methods will not be sufficient to achieve optimal screening rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信