持续贫困县与非持续贫困县的心理健康服务差异

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Nitin Katakam, Danielle Thistle
{"title":"持续贫困县与非持续贫困县的心理健康服务差异","authors":"Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Nitin Katakam, Danielle Thistle","doi":"10.1007/s11414-025-09973-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a dose-response relationship between the incidence of psychiatric issues and poverty. To better understand disparities related to extreme poverty and inequality, this study aims to investigate whether there is a difference in mental health services between counties identified as persistent poverty counties and those not identified. Data from the National Survey on Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services and the U.S. Census American Community Survey were analyzed. A random-effects logit regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of access to various types of mental health facilities, behavioral health services, medical services, screening services, emergency services, and ancillary services. Adjusted regression results revealed that persistent poverty county status was associated with a lower likelihood of residential facility services (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.96), a higher likelihood of medication use (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.20, 2.09), and a higher likelihood of ancillary services (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16), especially chronic disease management, housing, intensive case management, and peer support. Meanwhile, fewer trauma-related treatments were available in these counties. A subsample of rural counties showed similar results. Mental health providers in persistent poverty counties were less likely to offer residential and behavioral health services and more likely to provide medication and ancillary services. Implications for mental health policy and practitioners are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental Health Service Disparities in Persistent Poverty Counties versus Non-Persistent Poverty Counties.\",\"authors\":\"Carissa van den Berk-Clark, Nitin Katakam, Danielle Thistle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-025-09973-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a dose-response relationship between the incidence of psychiatric issues and poverty. To better understand disparities related to extreme poverty and inequality, this study aims to investigate whether there is a difference in mental health services between counties identified as persistent poverty counties and those not identified. Data from the National Survey on Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services and the U.S. Census American Community Survey were analyzed. A random-effects logit regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of access to various types of mental health facilities, behavioral health services, medical services, screening services, emergency services, and ancillary services. Adjusted regression results revealed that persistent poverty county status was associated with a lower likelihood of residential facility services (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.96), a higher likelihood of medication use (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.20, 2.09), and a higher likelihood of ancillary services (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16), especially chronic disease management, housing, intensive case management, and peer support. Meanwhile, fewer trauma-related treatments were available in these counties. A subsample of rural counties showed similar results. Mental health providers in persistent poverty counties were less likely to offer residential and behavioral health services and more likely to provide medication and ancillary services. Implications for mental health policy and practitioners are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09973-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-025-09973-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神问题的发生率与贫困之间存在剂量-反应关系。为了更好地理解与极端贫困和不平等相关的差异,本研究旨在调查被确定为持续贫困县和未被确定为持续贫困县的县之间的心理健康服务是否存在差异。分析了来自全国药物滥用和心理健康服务调查和美国人口普查美国社区调查的数据。进行随机效应logit回归分析,以确定获得各种类型的精神卫生设施、行为卫生服务、医疗服务、筛查服务、紧急服务和辅助服务的可能性。调整后的回归结果显示,持续贫困县的状态与较低的居住设施服务可能性(OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.96)、较高的药物使用可能性(OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.20, 2.09)和较高的辅助服务可能性(OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16)相关,特别是慢性病管理、住房、重症病例管理和同伴支持。与此同时,这些县的创伤相关治疗较少。农村县的子样本显示了类似的结果。持续贫困县的心理健康提供者不太可能提供住宿和行为健康服务,而更可能提供药物和辅助服务。对心理健康政策和从业者的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental Health Service Disparities in Persistent Poverty Counties versus Non-Persistent Poverty Counties.

There is a dose-response relationship between the incidence of psychiatric issues and poverty. To better understand disparities related to extreme poverty and inequality, this study aims to investigate whether there is a difference in mental health services between counties identified as persistent poverty counties and those not identified. Data from the National Survey on Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services and the U.S. Census American Community Survey were analyzed. A random-effects logit regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of access to various types of mental health facilities, behavioral health services, medical services, screening services, emergency services, and ancillary services. Adjusted regression results revealed that persistent poverty county status was associated with a lower likelihood of residential facility services (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.96), a higher likelihood of medication use (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.20, 2.09), and a higher likelihood of ancillary services (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16), especially chronic disease management, housing, intensive case management, and peer support. Meanwhile, fewer trauma-related treatments were available in these counties. A subsample of rural counties showed similar results. Mental health providers in persistent poverty counties were less likely to offer residential and behavioral health services and more likely to provide medication and ancillary services. Implications for mental health policy and practitioners are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信