对皮肤活检作为诊断工具的信念和态度:美国患者的横断面调查。

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Melanoma Management Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1080/20450885.2025.2564060
Chaitra Subramanyam, Nimrit Gahoonia, Catherine Shachaf, Raja Sivamani
{"title":"对皮肤活检作为诊断工具的信念和态度:美国患者的横断面调查。","authors":"Chaitra Subramanyam, Nimrit Gahoonia, Catherine Shachaf, Raja Sivamani","doi":"10.1080/20450885.2025.2564060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Skin biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard for assessing melanocytic lesions, yet its use is influenced by provider experience and scope of practice. This study evaluated patient attitudes toward biopsy, barriers such as discomfort and needle phobia, and interest in noninvasive alternatives.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 506 adults assessed prior biopsy experience, biopsy-related discomfort, recovery time, anesthesia pain, needle fear and willingness to pay for noninvasive tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight percent of respondents had undergone biopsy. Of these, two-thirds reported discomfort and 28% rated it moderate to high. Recovery lasted ≥1 week for 59%, ≥2 weeks for 18%, and ≥1 month for 7%. Anesthesia was moderately to very painful for 33%. Common concerns included pain, scarring, infection risk and prolonged healing. Among those with biopsy experience, 53% expressed strong interest in noninvasive diagnostics, and 82% were willing to pay out-of-pocket.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported pain, needle fear and prolonged recovery contribute to hesitancy toward biopsy. Strong interest in noninvasive methods underscores the need to advance alternatives such as reflective confocal microscopy, tape stripping and electrical impedance spectroscopy, while future studies should examine socioeconomic and access-related influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":44562,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"2564060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs and attitudes toward skin biopsy as a diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional survey among US patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chaitra Subramanyam, Nimrit Gahoonia, Catherine Shachaf, Raja Sivamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20450885.2025.2564060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Skin biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard for assessing melanocytic lesions, yet its use is influenced by provider experience and scope of practice. This study evaluated patient attitudes toward biopsy, barriers such as discomfort and needle phobia, and interest in noninvasive alternatives.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 506 adults assessed prior biopsy experience, biopsy-related discomfort, recovery time, anesthesia pain, needle fear and willingness to pay for noninvasive tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight percent of respondents had undergone biopsy. Of these, two-thirds reported discomfort and 28% rated it moderate to high. Recovery lasted ≥1 week for 59%, ≥2 weeks for 18%, and ≥1 month for 7%. Anesthesia was moderately to very painful for 33%. Common concerns included pain, scarring, infection risk and prolonged healing. Among those with biopsy experience, 53% expressed strong interest in noninvasive diagnostics, and 82% were willing to pay out-of-pocket.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-reported pain, needle fear and prolonged recovery contribute to hesitancy toward biopsy. Strong interest in noninvasive methods underscores the need to advance alternatives such as reflective confocal microscopy, tape stripping and electrical impedance spectroscopy, while future studies should examine socioeconomic and access-related influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melanoma Management\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"2564060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melanoma Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20450885.2025.2564060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20450885.2025.2564060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:皮肤活检仍然是评估黑素细胞病变的诊断金标准,但其使用受到提供者经验和实践范围的影响。本研究评估了患者对活检的态度、不适和针头恐惧症等障碍以及对非侵入性替代方法的兴趣。患者和方法:对506名成人进行横断面调查,评估既往活检经历、活检相关不适、恢复时间、麻醉疼痛、针头恐惧和购买无创工具的意愿。结果:28%的受访者接受了活检。其中三分之二的人表示不舒服,28%的人认为是中度到重度。恢复≥1周的占59%,≥2周的占18%,≥1个月的占7%。33%的人麻醉时中度至重度疼痛。常见的担忧包括疼痛、疤痕、感染风险和长期愈合。在有活组织检查经验的人中,53%的人对无创诊断表达了强烈的兴趣,82%的人愿意自掏腰包。结论:患者自述的疼痛、针头恐惧和恢复时间过长导致对活检犹豫不决。对非侵入性方法的强烈兴趣强调了推进诸如反射共聚焦显微镜、胶带剥离和电阻抗光谱等替代方法的必要性,而未来的研究应检查社会经济和获取相关的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beliefs and attitudes toward skin biopsy as a diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional survey among US patients.

Aims: Skin biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard for assessing melanocytic lesions, yet its use is influenced by provider experience and scope of practice. This study evaluated patient attitudes toward biopsy, barriers such as discomfort and needle phobia, and interest in noninvasive alternatives.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 506 adults assessed prior biopsy experience, biopsy-related discomfort, recovery time, anesthesia pain, needle fear and willingness to pay for noninvasive tools.

Results: Twenty-eight percent of respondents had undergone biopsy. Of these, two-thirds reported discomfort and 28% rated it moderate to high. Recovery lasted ≥1 week for 59%, ≥2 weeks for 18%, and ≥1 month for 7%. Anesthesia was moderately to very painful for 33%. Common concerns included pain, scarring, infection risk and prolonged healing. Among those with biopsy experience, 53% expressed strong interest in noninvasive diagnostics, and 82% were willing to pay out-of-pocket.

Conclusions: Patient-reported pain, needle fear and prolonged recovery contribute to hesitancy toward biopsy. Strong interest in noninvasive methods underscores the need to advance alternatives such as reflective confocal microscopy, tape stripping and electrical impedance spectroscopy, while future studies should examine socioeconomic and access-related influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Skin cancer is on the rise. According to the World Health Organization, 132,000 melanoma skin cancers occur globally each year. While early-stage melanoma is usually relatively easy to treat, once disease spreads prognosis worsens considerably. Therefore, research into combating advanced-stage melanoma is a high priority. New and emerging therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, B-RAF and KIT inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents and novel chemotherapy approaches hold promise for prolonging survival, but the search for a cure is ongoing. Melanoma Management publishes high-quality peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of melanoma, from prevention to diagnosis and from treatment of early-stage disease to late-stage melanoma and metastasis. The journal presents the latest research findings in melanoma research and treatment, together with authoritative reviews, cutting-edge editorials and perspectives that highlight hot topics and controversy in the field. Independent drug evaluations assess newly approved medications and their role in clinical practice. Key topics covered include: Risk factors, prevention and sun safety education Diagnosis, staging and grading Surgical excision of melanoma lesions Sentinel lymph node biopsy Biological therapies, including immunotherapy and vaccination Novel chemotherapy options Treatment of metastasis Prevention of recurrence Patient care and quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信