N M A Siti, S Ghaneshinee, D Faiz, S Nazarudin, M N Azmawati
{"title":"公共卫生和初级保健医生的工作满意度:一项系统回顾。","authors":"N M A Siti, S Ghaneshinee, D Faiz, S Nazarudin, M N Azmawati","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Job satisfaction among physicians involved in public health services including public health physicians and primary care physicians is critical for their performance, motivation, and retention. These professionals address systemic health challenges and ensure effective health promotion at the population level. Despite their significance, they face challenges such as high workloads, administrative burdens, and insufficient resources, adversely affecting their satisfaction. This systematic review aims to examine the levels and determinants of job satisfaction among physicians engaged in public health roles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613843). Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Fourteen eligible studies were selected based on strict criteria. Data synthesis employed an emerging clusters approach to identify factors influencing job satisfaction, categorised into four themes: job characteristics and role clarity, organisational support and leadership, work environment and culture, and rewards and career development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 7313 physicians highlighted high workloads (60%) and administrative burdens (53%) as key sources of dissatisfaction. Approximately 44.7% reported high satisfaction, driven by autonomy in decision-making, supportive environments, doctor-patient relationships, and work-life balance. In contrast, 32% experienced moderate satisfaction, linked to manageable administrative tasks and fair remuneration. However, 20% reported low satisfaction, primarily due to excessive workloads, poor leadership support, financial insecurity, and limited career progression opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Job satisfaction among physicians in public health roles is moderate through a combination of high and low satisfaction factors. These professionals face demanding environments requiring them to balance administrative responsibilities, staff issues, community satisfaction, and resource allocations. Enhancing job satisfaction is essential for improving workforce morale and achieving effective public health outcomes. Implementing targeted interventions to address these challenges can foster long-term workforce stability and organisational success.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 5","pages":"612-626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job satisfaction among public health and primary care physicians: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"N M A Siti, S Ghaneshinee, D Faiz, S Nazarudin, M N Azmawati\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Job satisfaction among physicians involved in public health services including public health physicians and primary care physicians is critical for their performance, motivation, and retention. These professionals address systemic health challenges and ensure effective health promotion at the population level. Despite their significance, they face challenges such as high workloads, administrative burdens, and insufficient resources, adversely affecting their satisfaction. This systematic review aims to examine the levels and determinants of job satisfaction among physicians engaged in public health roles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613843). Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Fourteen eligible studies were selected based on strict criteria. Data synthesis employed an emerging clusters approach to identify factors influencing job satisfaction, categorised into four themes: job characteristics and role clarity, organisational support and leadership, work environment and culture, and rewards and career development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 7313 physicians highlighted high workloads (60%) and administrative burdens (53%) as key sources of dissatisfaction. Approximately 44.7% reported high satisfaction, driven by autonomy in decision-making, supportive environments, doctor-patient relationships, and work-life balance. In contrast, 32% experienced moderate satisfaction, linked to manageable administrative tasks and fair remuneration. However, 20% reported low satisfaction, primarily due to excessive workloads, poor leadership support, financial insecurity, and limited career progression opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Job satisfaction among physicians in public health roles is moderate through a combination of high and low satisfaction factors. These professionals face demanding environments requiring them to balance administrative responsibilities, staff issues, community satisfaction, and resource allocations. Enhancing job satisfaction is essential for improving workforce morale and achieving effective public health outcomes. Implementing targeted interventions to address these challenges can foster long-term workforce stability and organisational success.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":\"80 5\",\"pages\":\"612-626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:参与公共卫生服务的医生(包括公共卫生医生和初级保健医生)的工作满意度对他们的表现、动机和留任至关重要。这些专业人员应对系统性卫生挑战,并确保在人口层面上有效促进健康。尽管他们很重要,但他们面临着诸如高工作量、管理负担和资源不足等挑战,这对他们的满意度产生了不利影响。本系统综述旨在研究从事公共卫生工作的医生工作满意度的水平和决定因素。材料和方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南,在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024613843)。文章从PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中检索。根据严格的标准选择了14项符合条件的研究。数据综合采用了一种新兴集群方法来确定影响工作满意度的因素,并将其分为四个主题:工作特征和角色清晰度、组织支持和领导力、工作环境和文化、奖励和职业发展。结果:7313名医生的数据突出了高工作量(60%)和行政负担(53%)是不满的主要来源。大约44.7%的受访者表示高满意度,这主要得益于自主决策、支持性环境、医患关系和工作与生活的平衡。相比之下,32%的人对可管理的行政任务和公平的报酬感到满意。然而,20%的人表示满意度较低,主要原因是工作量过大、领导支持不足、经济不稳定以及职业发展机会有限。结论:公共卫生职业医师的工作满意度在高满意度和低满意度因素的综合作用下呈中等水平。这些专业人员面临苛刻的环境,要求他们平衡管理责任、员工问题、社区满意度和资源分配。提高工作满意度对于提高员工士气和实现有效的公共卫生成果至关重要。实施有针对性的干预措施来应对这些挑战,可以促进劳动力的长期稳定和组织的成功。
Job satisfaction among public health and primary care physicians: A systematic review.
Introduction: Job satisfaction among physicians involved in public health services including public health physicians and primary care physicians is critical for their performance, motivation, and retention. These professionals address systemic health challenges and ensure effective health promotion at the population level. Despite their significance, they face challenges such as high workloads, administrative burdens, and insufficient resources, adversely affecting their satisfaction. This systematic review aims to examine the levels and determinants of job satisfaction among physicians engaged in public health roles.
Materials and methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024613843). Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Fourteen eligible studies were selected based on strict criteria. Data synthesis employed an emerging clusters approach to identify factors influencing job satisfaction, categorised into four themes: job characteristics and role clarity, organisational support and leadership, work environment and culture, and rewards and career development.
Results: Data from 7313 physicians highlighted high workloads (60%) and administrative burdens (53%) as key sources of dissatisfaction. Approximately 44.7% reported high satisfaction, driven by autonomy in decision-making, supportive environments, doctor-patient relationships, and work-life balance. In contrast, 32% experienced moderate satisfaction, linked to manageable administrative tasks and fair remuneration. However, 20% reported low satisfaction, primarily due to excessive workloads, poor leadership support, financial insecurity, and limited career progression opportunities.
Conclusion: Job satisfaction among physicians in public health roles is moderate through a combination of high and low satisfaction factors. These professionals face demanding environments requiring them to balance administrative responsibilities, staff issues, community satisfaction, and resource allocations. Enhancing job satisfaction is essential for improving workforce morale and achieving effective public health outcomes. Implementing targeted interventions to address these challenges can foster long-term workforce stability and organisational success.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.