Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin
{"title":"母体恶性肿瘤分期无细胞DNA筛查结果。","authors":"Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101804"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell-Free DNA Screening Results by Stage of Maternal Malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cell-Free DNA Screening Results by Stage of Maternal Malignancy.
Background: Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.
Objective: To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.
Study design: This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.
Results: We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including:
Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women.
Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health.
Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child.
Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby.
Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.