母体恶性肿瘤分期无细胞DNA筛查结果。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin
{"title":"母体恶性肿瘤分期无细胞DNA筛查结果。","authors":"Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101804"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell-Free DNA Screening Results by Stage of Maternal Malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Zhao, Kristen A Miller, Jonathan Webster, Jamie Perin, Ashley Coggins, Angie C Jelin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无细胞DNA筛查越来越多地用于胎儿非整倍体筛查。母体恶性肿瘤与异常的无细胞DNA结果相关;然而,肿瘤分期和起源对无细胞DNA结果的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨导致游离DNA筛查结果异常的恶性肿瘤的类型和分期。研究设计:采用ICD9/10恶性肿瘤编码,对2015-2023年妊娠期已知、疑似或偶然诊断的恶性肿瘤病例进行单中心回顾性研究。我们提取了母亲的病史、癌症病史、非整倍体筛查结果和胎儿结局。我们使用fisher精确和Wilcoxon秩和检验来确定cfDNA筛查结果与(1)人口统计学因素、(2)癌症特征和(3)胎儿结局之间的关系。结果:发现97例妊娠期恶性肿瘤。33例患者未进行非整倍体筛查。22人接受了妊娠早期筛查,4人接受了四项筛查,结果均为低风险。在38例进行无细胞DNA筛查的患者中,21.1%(8/38)为血液病,78.9%(30/38)为实体瘤。最常见的部位是乳房(11/38)、血液(8/38)和胃肠道(5/38)。总体而言,31.6%(12/38)的患者无细胞DNA结果异常。0、I、II、III和IV期实体癌中游离DNA结果异常的比例分别为0/4(0%)、0/5(0%)、2/6(33.3%)、1/4(25%)和7/11(63.6%)。两组间转移状态差异显著:47.6% (10/21)II-IV期实体癌患者游离DNA结果异常,而0-I期实体癌患者的游离DNA结果异常为0% (0/9)(p=0.013)。没有胎儿确诊为非整倍体。结论:我们的数据表明,与转移性肿瘤相比,早期实体瘤对无细胞DNA筛查结果的影响较小。需要更大的队列来进一步表征肿瘤类型/分期与无细胞DNA结果之间的关系。最终,无细胞DNA筛查可能更有可能偶然诊断出某些类型的母体恶性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cell-Free DNA Screening Results by Stage of Maternal Malignancy.

Background: Cell-free DNA screening is increasingly used for fetal aneuploidy screening. Maternal malignancy is associated with abnormal cell-free DNA results; however, the impact of tumor staging and origin on cell-free DNA results remains unclear.

Objective: To characterize the types and stages of malignancies resulting in abnormal cell-free DNA screening results.

Study design: This is a single center, retrospective review of cases with a known, suspected, or incidentally diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy from 2015-2023 queried using ICD9/10 codes for malignancy. We extracted maternal medical history, cancer history, aneuploidy screening results and fetal outcomes. We used Fishers exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to determine associations between cfDNA screening results and (1) demographic factors, (2) cancer characteristics, and (3) fetal outcomes.

Results: We identified 97 cases of malignancy in pregnancy. Thirty-three patients had no aneuploidy screening. Twenty-two underwent first trimester screening and 4 underwent quad screening, all with low-risk results. Among the 38 patients who had cell-free DNA screening, 21.1% (8/38) were hematologic and 78.9% (30/38) were solid tumors. The most common locations were breast (11/38), blood (8/38), and gastrointestinal (5/38). Overall, 31.6% (12/38) of patients had abnormal cell-free DNA results. The fraction of stage 0, I, II, III, and IV solid cancers with abnormal cell-free DNA results was 0/4 (0%), 0/5 (0%), 2/6 (33.3%), 1/4 (25%), and 7/11 (63.6%), respectively. Metastasized status was significantly different between groups: 47.6% (10/21) of patients with stage II-IV solid cancers had abnormal cell-free DNA results, compared to 0% (0/9) of patients with stage 0-I solid cancers (p=0.013). No fetuses had a confirmed aneuploidy.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that early stage, solid tumors are less likely to impact cell-free DNA screening results than metastatic tumors. Larger cohorts are needed to further characterize the association between tumor type/stage and cell-free DNA result. Ultimately, cell-free DNA screening may be more likely to incidentally diagnose certain types of maternal malignancy than others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信