探索氧化应激介导的遗传毒理学模式的行动使用途径分析,连接映射和转录基准剂量为基础的框架。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
K Nadira De Abrew, Bastian G Selman, Mahmoud Shobair, Xiaoling Zhang, Ashley J Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler
{"title":"探索氧化应激介导的遗传毒理学模式的行动使用途径分析,连接映射和转录基准剂量为基础的框架。","authors":"K Nadira De Abrew, Bastian G Selman, Mahmoud Shobair, Xiaoling Zhang, Ashley J Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While current genetic toxicology practices can detect downstream genotoxicity effects, such as gene mutation and double strand breaks, they are unable to detect the underlying Mode of Action (MoA) of a chemical or differentiate between direct and indirect acting genotoxicants without additional modification. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a useful tool to critically identify and evaluate MOAs and can enable subsequent quantitative dose response assessments of genotoxicity endpoints. The recently developed AOP, \"Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations\" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/296), pertains to one common genetic toxicology relevant MOA: oxidative stress. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key to regulating many biological processes, however, when disrupted, an excess of ROS can eventually lead to DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Here, we look at 18 compounds reported to have complete or mixed oxidative stress MOAs and use a combination of genomic tools such as Pathway analysis, Connectivity mapping and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling to define a framework that can separate substances that test negative in vivo from true in vivo genotoxicants. TK6 cells were treated with the 18 compounds for 4 hours, parallel micronucleus and genomics experiments were performed, and in vitro micronucleus data were used to infer dose for genomics analysis. The resulting genomic data was analyzed using pathway analysis for hypothesis generation, these hypotheses were tested using Connectivity mapping (CMap) and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling. We demonstrate that a genomics-based workflow based on in vitro methods can be used to successfully separate in vivo genotoxicants from non genotoxicants. These methods have the potential to evolve into Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) tools that can be used for determining the contribution of the oxidative stress MoA in a predictive toxicology setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Oxidative Stress Mediated Genetic Toxicology Modes of Actions Using a Pathway Analysis, Connectivity Mapping and Transcriptional Benchmark Dosing Based Framework.\",\"authors\":\"K Nadira De Abrew, Bastian G Selman, Mahmoud Shobair, Xiaoling Zhang, Ashley J Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While current genetic toxicology practices can detect downstream genotoxicity effects, such as gene mutation and double strand breaks, they are unable to detect the underlying Mode of Action (MoA) of a chemical or differentiate between direct and indirect acting genotoxicants without additional modification. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a useful tool to critically identify and evaluate MOAs and can enable subsequent quantitative dose response assessments of genotoxicity endpoints. The recently developed AOP, \\\"Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations\\\" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/296), pertains to one common genetic toxicology relevant MOA: oxidative stress. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key to regulating many biological processes, however, when disrupted, an excess of ROS can eventually lead to DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Here, we look at 18 compounds reported to have complete or mixed oxidative stress MOAs and use a combination of genomic tools such as Pathway analysis, Connectivity mapping and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling to define a framework that can separate substances that test negative in vivo from true in vivo genotoxicants. TK6 cells were treated with the 18 compounds for 4 hours, parallel micronucleus and genomics experiments were performed, and in vitro micronucleus data were used to infer dose for genomics analysis. The resulting genomic data was analyzed using pathway analysis for hypothesis generation, these hypotheses were tested using Connectivity mapping (CMap) and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling. We demonstrate that a genomics-based workflow based on in vitro methods can be used to successfully separate in vivo genotoxicants from non genotoxicants. These methods have the potential to evolve into Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) tools that can be used for determining the contribution of the oxidative stress MoA in a predictive toxicology setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfaf137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然目前的遗传毒理学实践可以检测下游遗传毒性效应,如基因突变和双链断裂,但它们无法检测化学物质的潜在作用模式(MoA),也无法区分直接和间接作用的基因毒性物质,而无需进行额外的修饰。不良结果途径(AOP)框架是一个有用的工具,可以严格识别和评估moa,并可以对遗传毒性终点进行后续定量剂量反应评估。最近开发的AOP,“氧化性DNA损伤导致染色体畸变和突变”(https://aopwiki.org/aops/296),涉及一种常见的遗传毒理学相关的MOA:氧化应激。活性氧(ROS)是调节许多生物过程的关键,然而,当ROS被破坏时,过量的ROS最终会导致DNA损伤和双链断裂。在这里,我们研究了18种据报道具有完全或混合氧化应激moa的化合物,并结合使用基因组工具,如通路分析、连接图谱和转录基准剂量模型,定义了一个框架,可以将体内检测为阴性的物质与体内真正的基因毒物分开。用这18种化合物处理TK6细胞4小时,进行平行微核和基因组学实验,利用体外微核数据推断剂量进行基因组学分析。使用通路分析来分析产生的基因组数据,并使用连接映射(CMap)和转录基准剂量模型对这些假设进行检验。我们证明了基于体外方法的基因组学工作流程可用于成功分离体内基因毒物和非基因毒物。这些方法有可能演变成下一代风险评估(NGRA)工具,可用于确定氧化应激MoA在预测毒理学环境中的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of Oxidative Stress Mediated Genetic Toxicology Modes of Actions Using a Pathway Analysis, Connectivity Mapping and Transcriptional Benchmark Dosing Based Framework.

While current genetic toxicology practices can detect downstream genotoxicity effects, such as gene mutation and double strand breaks, they are unable to detect the underlying Mode of Action (MoA) of a chemical or differentiate between direct and indirect acting genotoxicants without additional modification. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is a useful tool to critically identify and evaluate MOAs and can enable subsequent quantitative dose response assessments of genotoxicity endpoints. The recently developed AOP, "Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations" (https://aopwiki.org/aops/296), pertains to one common genetic toxicology relevant MOA: oxidative stress. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are key to regulating many biological processes, however, when disrupted, an excess of ROS can eventually lead to DNA damage and double-strand breaks. Here, we look at 18 compounds reported to have complete or mixed oxidative stress MOAs and use a combination of genomic tools such as Pathway analysis, Connectivity mapping and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling to define a framework that can separate substances that test negative in vivo from true in vivo genotoxicants. TK6 cells were treated with the 18 compounds for 4 hours, parallel micronucleus and genomics experiments were performed, and in vitro micronucleus data were used to infer dose for genomics analysis. The resulting genomic data was analyzed using pathway analysis for hypothesis generation, these hypotheses were tested using Connectivity mapping (CMap) and Transcriptional benchmark dose modeling. We demonstrate that a genomics-based workflow based on in vitro methods can be used to successfully separate in vivo genotoxicants from non genotoxicants. These methods have the potential to evolve into Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) tools that can be used for determining the contribution of the oxidative stress MoA in a predictive toxicology setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信