微创内镜经眶入路治疗额窦骨折的比较研究。

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18030041
Laurence Verstraete, Paulien Schillemans, Jan Meeus, Philippe Vuylsteke, Robin Willaert
{"title":"微创内镜经眶入路治疗额窦骨折的比较研究。","authors":"Laurence Verstraete, Paulien Schillemans, Jan Meeus, Philippe Vuylsteke, Robin Willaert","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18030041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the use of the endoscopic transorbital approach for reducing frontal sinus fractures and compare its outcomes with the traditional bicoronal approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis of case studies including all patients with frontal sinus fractures treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2023 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on treatment approach (through traumatic laceration, bicoronal, or endoscopic transorbital). For the comparative analysis, cases with associated maxillofacial fractures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 133 patients, 35 underwent surgery, with 6 patients treated using the endoscopic transorbital approach. This group of patients treated with the transorbital endoscopic approach demonstrated significantly shorter operative times compared to the bicoronal approach (mean 102 vs. 168 min, <i>p</i> = 0.021). They also had only minor complications, including temporary hypoesthesia and one transient ptosis. One patient had a minimal residual defect. The technique has been concluded to require endoscopic expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The endoscopic transorbital approach is a safe, minimally invasive alternative to the bicoronal approach for selected anterior wall frontal sinus fractures. Proper patient selection and surgical experience are essential to achieving favorable outcomes. Studies with longer follow-up are required to assess potential late complications, such as the development of mucoceles.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 3","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Transorbital Approach for Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Verstraete, Paulien Schillemans, Jan Meeus, Philippe Vuylsteke, Robin Willaert\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cmtr18030041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the use of the endoscopic transorbital approach for reducing frontal sinus fractures and compare its outcomes with the traditional bicoronal approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative analysis of case studies including all patients with frontal sinus fractures treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2023 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on treatment approach (through traumatic laceration, bicoronal, or endoscopic transorbital). For the comparative analysis, cases with associated maxillofacial fractures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 133 patients, 35 underwent surgery, with 6 patients treated using the endoscopic transorbital approach. This group of patients treated with the transorbital endoscopic approach demonstrated significantly shorter operative times compared to the bicoronal approach (mean 102 vs. 168 min, <i>p</i> = 0.021). They also had only minor complications, including temporary hypoesthesia and one transient ptosis. One patient had a minimal residual defect. The technique has been concluded to require endoscopic expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The endoscopic transorbital approach is a safe, minimally invasive alternative to the bicoronal approach for selected anterior wall frontal sinus fractures. Proper patient selection and surgical experience are essential to achieving favorable outcomes. Studies with longer follow-up are required to assess potential late complications, such as the development of mucoceles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18030041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18030041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估内镜下经眶入路治疗额窦骨折的效果,并将其与传统的双冠入路进行比较。方法:回顾性比较分析2013年1月至2023年12月在我院治疗的所有额窦骨折患者的病例研究。根据治疗方法(创伤性裂伤、双冠状或经眶内窥镜)对患者进行分类。为了进行对比分析,排除了伴有颌面骨折或脑脊液(CSF)渗漏的病例。结果:133例患者中,35例接受手术治疗,6例采用内镜下经眶入路治疗。与双冠入路相比,经眶内窥镜入路治疗的这组患者的手术时间明显缩短(平均102分钟vs 168分钟,p = 0.021)。他们也只有轻微的并发症,包括短暂的感觉减退和一次短暂的上睑下垂。一名患者有微小的残留缺陷。该技术已被认为需要内窥镜专家。结论:内镜下经眶入路是治疗前壁额窦骨折的一种安全、微创的双冠入路选择。正确的患者选择和手术经验是获得良好结果的必要条件。需要更长的随访研究来评估潜在的晚期并发症,如粘液囊肿的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Transorbital Approach for Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Comparative Study.

Background: This study aims to evaluate the use of the endoscopic transorbital approach for reducing frontal sinus fractures and compare its outcomes with the traditional bicoronal approach.

Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of case studies including all patients with frontal sinus fractures treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2023 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on treatment approach (through traumatic laceration, bicoronal, or endoscopic transorbital). For the comparative analysis, cases with associated maxillofacial fractures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage were excluded.

Results: Out of 133 patients, 35 underwent surgery, with 6 patients treated using the endoscopic transorbital approach. This group of patients treated with the transorbital endoscopic approach demonstrated significantly shorter operative times compared to the bicoronal approach (mean 102 vs. 168 min, p = 0.021). They also had only minor complications, including temporary hypoesthesia and one transient ptosis. One patient had a minimal residual defect. The technique has been concluded to require endoscopic expertise.

Conclusions: The endoscopic transorbital approach is a safe, minimally invasive alternative to the bicoronal approach for selected anterior wall frontal sinus fractures. Proper patient selection and surgical experience are essential to achieving favorable outcomes. Studies with longer follow-up are required to assess potential late complications, such as the development of mucoceles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信