改进流行病应对建模:来自英国传染病建模者社区的进展更新。

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Katharine Sherratt, Anna C Carnegie, Adam Kucharski, Anne Cori, Carl A B Pearson, Edward M Hill, Elizabeth Fearon, Emily Nightingale, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Li Pi, Nicholas G Davies, Sabine van Elsland, Sebastian Funk, Yang Liu, Sam Abbott
{"title":"改进流行病应对建模:来自英国传染病建模者社区的进展更新。","authors":"Katharine Sherratt, Anna C Carnegie, Adam Kucharski, Anne Cori, Carl A B Pearson, Edward M Hill, Elizabeth Fearon, Emily Nightingale, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Li Pi, Nicholas G Davies, Sabine van Elsland, Sebastian Funk, Yang Liu, Sam Abbott","doi":"10.1098/rsfs.2025.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reflect on the sustainability of modelling infectious disease outbreaks from the perspective of modelling as a field of practice. We formed a community of practice among UK infectious disease modellers who had contributed to the UK COVID-19 response. We previously used a participatory workshop approach to highlight issues in the infrastructure and incentives for outbreak modelling, and synthesized our experience into a set of 12 specific recommendations. Here, we track changes in the field of infectious disease modelling 1 year later, collecting the quantitative and qualitative views of change among 14 participants. We found participants continued to highlight a lack of ongoing, sufficient or appropriate action to develop outbreak modelling capacity in the UK, while positively noting collaborations among public health facing institutions. We emphasize the under-prioritization of funding for outbreak modelling outside of emergency response periods, and the continuation of unsustainable working practices. Correcting this is crucial to supporting evidence-based public health policy for outbreak preparedness and response.</p>","PeriodicalId":13795,"journal":{"name":"Interface Focus","volume":"15 4","pages":"20250007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving modelling for epidemic response: a progress update from a community of UK infectious disease modellers.\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Sherratt, Anna C Carnegie, Adam Kucharski, Anne Cori, Carl A B Pearson, Edward M Hill, Elizabeth Fearon, Emily Nightingale, Julian Villabona-Arenas, Li Pi, Nicholas G Davies, Sabine van Elsland, Sebastian Funk, Yang Liu, Sam Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsfs.2025.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We reflect on the sustainability of modelling infectious disease outbreaks from the perspective of modelling as a field of practice. We formed a community of practice among UK infectious disease modellers who had contributed to the UK COVID-19 response. We previously used a participatory workshop approach to highlight issues in the infrastructure and incentives for outbreak modelling, and synthesized our experience into a set of 12 specific recommendations. Here, we track changes in the field of infectious disease modelling 1 year later, collecting the quantitative and qualitative views of change among 14 participants. We found participants continued to highlight a lack of ongoing, sufficient or appropriate action to develop outbreak modelling capacity in the UK, while positively noting collaborations among public health facing institutions. We emphasize the under-prioritization of funding for outbreak modelling outside of emergency response periods, and the continuation of unsustainable working practices. Correcting this is crucial to supporting evidence-based public health policy for outbreak preparedness and response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interface Focus\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"20250007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interface Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2025.0007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interface Focus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2025.0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们从建模作为实践领域的角度反思传染病暴发建模的可持续性。我们在英国传染病建模人员中形成了一个实践社区,他们为英国应对COVID-19做出了贡献。我们以前使用参与性讲习班方法来强调基础设施和疫情建模激励机制方面的问题,并将我们的经验综合为一套12项具体建议。在这里,我们追踪1年后传染病建模领域的变化,收集14名参与者对变化的定量和定性看法。我们发现,参与者继续强调在英国缺乏持续的、充分的或适当的行动来发展疫情建模能力,同时积极地注意到公共卫生机构之间的合作。我们强调,在紧急反应期之外,没有优先考虑为疫情模拟提供资金,并且继续采用不可持续的工作做法。纠正这一点对于支持基于证据的公共卫生政策以防备和应对疫情至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving modelling for epidemic response: a progress update from a community of UK infectious disease modellers.

Improving modelling for epidemic response: a progress update from a community of UK infectious disease modellers.

We reflect on the sustainability of modelling infectious disease outbreaks from the perspective of modelling as a field of practice. We formed a community of practice among UK infectious disease modellers who had contributed to the UK COVID-19 response. We previously used a participatory workshop approach to highlight issues in the infrastructure and incentives for outbreak modelling, and synthesized our experience into a set of 12 specific recommendations. Here, we track changes in the field of infectious disease modelling 1 year later, collecting the quantitative and qualitative views of change among 14 participants. We found participants continued to highlight a lack of ongoing, sufficient or appropriate action to develop outbreak modelling capacity in the UK, while positively noting collaborations among public health facing institutions. We emphasize the under-prioritization of funding for outbreak modelling outside of emergency response periods, and the continuation of unsustainable working practices. Correcting this is crucial to supporting evidence-based public health policy for outbreak preparedness and response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interface Focus
Interface Focus BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each Interface Focus themed issue is devoted to a particular subject at the interface of the physical and life sciences. Formed of high-quality articles, they aim to facilitate cross-disciplinary research across this traditional divide by acting as a forum accessible to all. Topics may be newly emerging areas of research or dynamic aspects of more established fields. Organisers of each Interface Focus are strongly encouraged to contextualise the journal within their chosen subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信