单一卫生系统住院患者阿哌沙班和利伐沙班校准抗xa水平监测的回顾性定性分析及其临床意义。

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bailey McCarville, Jennifer Osborn
{"title":"单一卫生系统住院患者阿哌沙班和利伐沙班校准抗xa水平监测的回顾性定性分析及其临床意义。","authors":"Bailey McCarville, Jennifer Osborn","doi":"10.1177/00185787251372413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787251372413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Single Health System Retrospective Qualitative Analysis of Inpatient Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Calibrated Anti-Xa Level Monitoring and Clinical Implications.\",\"authors\":\"Bailey McCarville, Jennifer Osborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787251372413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00185787251372413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251372413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251372413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:阿哌沙班和利伐沙班的定量药物水平存在使用药物特异性校准抗xa测定;然而,没有标准规定何时获得直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)浓度或如何根据结果调整用药方案。目的:描述获得的DOAC水平的发生率,确定临床实践中处方DOAC水平的趋势,并定性评估水平的适宜性和基于水平结果采取的措施。方法:利用电子病历进行定性、回顾性分析,以确定2020年4月1日至2022年11月1日期间10家医院卫生系统中校准阿哌沙班或利伐沙班抗xa水平结果的成年住院患者。主要终点是DOAC水平的发生率。次要结局包括引起剂量变化的DOAC浓度的百分比,剂量或药物变化与治疗范围外的浓度之间的关系,以及获得DOAC水平的适应症与最终浓度之间的关系。结果:在研究期间,101例住院患者获得了132个校准的抗xa水平,占所有阿哌沙班和利伐沙班订单的0.48%。83例(63%)患者使用阿哌沙班。测定DOAC水平的主要原因是体重超标(35%)、担心治疗失败(23%)、担心出血(18%)和药物相互作用(14%)。所有级别中只有42个(31.8%)被恰当地绘制为峰值。17例(40.4%)的峰值水平在治疗范围内。在治疗范围之外的25个水平中,14个(56%)导致治疗没有改变。在所有水平中,70例(53%)未导致治疗改变。结论:DOAC浓度通常在不适当的时间提取,很少影响剂量或药物的变化。需要进一步的研究来确定DOAC浓度在一个选定的亚组患者中是否具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Single Health System Retrospective Qualitative Analysis of Inpatient Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Calibrated Anti-Xa Level Monitoring and Clinical Implications.

Introduction: The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.

Objective: Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.

Methods: A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.

Results: One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.

Conclusions: DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信