{"title":"单一卫生系统住院患者阿哌沙班和利伐沙班校准抗xa水平监测的回顾性定性分析及其临床意义。","authors":"Bailey McCarville, Jennifer Osborn","doi":"10.1177/00185787251372413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787251372413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Single Health System Retrospective Qualitative Analysis of Inpatient Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Calibrated Anti-Xa Level Monitoring and Clinical Implications.\",\"authors\":\"Bailey McCarville, Jennifer Osborn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787251372413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00185787251372413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460266/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251372413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251372413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Single Health System Retrospective Qualitative Analysis of Inpatient Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Calibrated Anti-Xa Level Monitoring and Clinical Implications.
Introduction: The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results.
Objective: Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results.
Methods: A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations.
Results: One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy.
Conclusions: DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.
期刊介绍:
Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.