Joseph J Chin, W Daniel Walls, Kai Wang, Amanda M Odell, Diana L Kolbe, Kevin T A Booth, Hela Azaiez, Richard J H Smith
{"title":"GSDME的研究结果鉴定了第一个致病同义变异体和基因型-表型相关性。","authors":"Joseph J Chin, W Daniel Walls, Kai Wang, Amanda M Odell, Diana L Kolbe, Kevin T A Booth, Hela Azaiez, Richard J H Smith","doi":"10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite advances in the genetic diagnosis of hearing loss, there remains room for improvement. One way to improve the genetic diagnostic rate is the proper assessment of synonymous variants that are often bioinformatically filtered out. We used GSDME as a model to demonstrate the importance of assessing synonymous variants. Variants in the gene GSDME (also known as DFNA5) are associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. The hearing loss is typically progressive and downsloping. All reported causative variants of GSDME-related hearing loss involve the skipping of exon 8, which results in the expression of a constitutively active, but truncated protein that induces apoptosis of cochlear hair cells. A retrospective search of previously tested patients identified 3 novel pathogenic synonymous GSDME variants. The functional impact of these variants was confirmed in vitro via a minigene splicing assay. We also observed variant-dependent differences in the levels of aberrant splicing, leading us to hypothesize that partial loss of splicing will result in a less severe hearing loss phenotype as compared to complete loss of splicing. Audiometric analysis found an association between complete loss of splicing and greater initial and/or more quickly progressing hearing loss as compared to partial loss of splicing. Over the course of the study, we also found limited correlation between in silico prediction and in vitro observed effects of a variant on splicing, indicating the need to cautiously apply in silico prediction tools in the context of genetic diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of GSDME results in the identification of the first pathogenic synonymous variants and genotype-phenotype correlations.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph J Chin, W Daniel Walls, Kai Wang, Amanda M Odell, Diana L Kolbe, Kevin T A Booth, Hela Azaiez, Richard J H Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite advances in the genetic diagnosis of hearing loss, there remains room for improvement. One way to improve the genetic diagnostic rate is the proper assessment of synonymous variants that are often bioinformatically filtered out. We used GSDME as a model to demonstrate the importance of assessing synonymous variants. Variants in the gene GSDME (also known as DFNA5) are associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. The hearing loss is typically progressive and downsloping. All reported causative variants of GSDME-related hearing loss involve the skipping of exon 8, which results in the expression of a constitutively active, but truncated protein that induces apoptosis of cochlear hair cells. A retrospective search of previously tested patients identified 3 novel pathogenic synonymous GSDME variants. The functional impact of these variants was confirmed in vitro via a minigene splicing assay. We also observed variant-dependent differences in the levels of aberrant splicing, leading us to hypothesize that partial loss of splicing will result in a less severe hearing loss phenotype as compared to complete loss of splicing. Audiometric analysis found an association between complete loss of splicing and greater initial and/or more quickly progressing hearing loss as compared to partial loss of splicing. Over the course of the study, we also found limited correlation between in silico prediction and in vitro observed effects of a variant on splicing, indicating the need to cautiously apply in silico prediction tools in the context of genetic diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02782-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigation of GSDME results in the identification of the first pathogenic synonymous variants and genotype-phenotype correlations.
Despite advances in the genetic diagnosis of hearing loss, there remains room for improvement. One way to improve the genetic diagnostic rate is the proper assessment of synonymous variants that are often bioinformatically filtered out. We used GSDME as a model to demonstrate the importance of assessing synonymous variants. Variants in the gene GSDME (also known as DFNA5) are associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. The hearing loss is typically progressive and downsloping. All reported causative variants of GSDME-related hearing loss involve the skipping of exon 8, which results in the expression of a constitutively active, but truncated protein that induces apoptosis of cochlear hair cells. A retrospective search of previously tested patients identified 3 novel pathogenic synonymous GSDME variants. The functional impact of these variants was confirmed in vitro via a minigene splicing assay. We also observed variant-dependent differences in the levels of aberrant splicing, leading us to hypothesize that partial loss of splicing will result in a less severe hearing loss phenotype as compared to complete loss of splicing. Audiometric analysis found an association between complete loss of splicing and greater initial and/or more quickly progressing hearing loss as compared to partial loss of splicing. Over the course of the study, we also found limited correlation between in silico prediction and in vitro observed effects of a variant on splicing, indicating the need to cautiously apply in silico prediction tools in the context of genetic diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology.
Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted.
The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.