脉冲电磁场治疗拇指掌关节疼痛的临床疗效:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-09-28 DOI:10.1177/15589447251371088
Maxwell S Durtschi, Vinod Rajakumar, Deborah E Kenney, Nicole S Pham, Amy L Ladd, Raymond C Chou
{"title":"脉冲电磁场治疗拇指掌关节疼痛的临床疗效:一项双盲、随机、对照试验。","authors":"Maxwell S Durtschi, Vinod Rajakumar, Deborah E Kenney, Nicole S Pham, Amy L Ladd, Raymond C Chou","doi":"10.1177/15589447251371088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common source of hand pain with limited nonoperative treatment options. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been recently shown in studies to be effective in providing sustained pain relief in knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of PEMF therapy for treating thumb CMC OA pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included adults with radiographically and/or clinically diagnosed CMC OA who reported an average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score between 3 and 8. Participants were randomized to either a PEMF device or an identical sham device that was used for 8 hours each night for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in average daily NPRS from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at 4 and 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one participants were recruited, and 51 participants completed the study at 4 weeks. Both the PEMF therapy and sham device groups showed improvements in average NPRS and PRWHE at 4 weeks, but there was not a significant improvement between groups. At 6 weeks, there was a significantly greater change in average NPRS from baseline in the PEMF therapy group compared with the sham device group (<i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy may improve thumb CMC OA pain with sustained relief beyond the treatment period. Future studies will need to assess if adjusting treatment duration or other factors can enhance its efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447251371088"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maxwell S Durtschi, Vinod Rajakumar, Deborah E Kenney, Nicole S Pham, Amy L Ladd, Raymond C Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447251371088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common source of hand pain with limited nonoperative treatment options. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been recently shown in studies to be effective in providing sustained pain relief in knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of PEMF therapy for treating thumb CMC OA pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included adults with radiographically and/or clinically diagnosed CMC OA who reported an average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score between 3 and 8. Participants were randomized to either a PEMF device or an identical sham device that was used for 8 hours each night for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in average daily NPRS from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at 4 and 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one participants were recruited, and 51 participants completed the study at 4 weeks. Both the PEMF therapy and sham device groups showed improvements in average NPRS and PRWHE at 4 weeks, but there was not a significant improvement between groups. At 6 weeks, there was a significantly greater change in average NPRS from baseline in the PEMF therapy group compared with the sham device group (<i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy may improve thumb CMC OA pain with sustained relief beyond the treatment period. Future studies will need to assess if adjusting treatment duration or other factors can enhance its efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447251371088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251371088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447251371088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拇指腕掌骨关节炎(CMC)是手部疼痛的常见来源,非手术治疗选择有限。脉冲电磁场(PEMF)治疗最近在研究中被证明是有效的提供持续的疼痛缓解膝骨关节炎。本研究旨在评估PEMF治疗拇指CMC OA疼痛的疗效。方法:这项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验纳入了影像学和/或临床诊断为CMC OA的成人,他们的平均疼痛评定量表(NPRS)评分在3到8分之间。参与者被随机分配到一个PEMF装置或一个相同的假装置,每晚使用8小时,持续4周。主要结局指标是平均每日NPRS从基线到4周的变化。次要结果测量包括4周和6周时患者评定腕/手评估(PRWHE)和单一评估数值评估。结果:61名参与者被招募,51名参与者在4周内完成了研究。在4周时,PEMF治疗组和假装置组的平均NPRS和PRWHE均有改善,但组间无显著改善。在6周时,与假装置组相比,PEMF治疗组的平均NPRS比基线有显著更大的变化(P = 0.02)。结论:脉冲电磁场治疗可改善拇指CMC OA疼痛,治疗期后疼痛持续缓解。未来的研究将需要评估调整治疗时间或其他因素是否可以提高其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common source of hand pain with limited nonoperative treatment options. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been recently shown in studies to be effective in providing sustained pain relief in knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of PEMF therapy for treating thumb CMC OA pain.

Methods: This single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included adults with radiographically and/or clinically diagnosed CMC OA who reported an average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score between 3 and 8. Participants were randomized to either a PEMF device or an identical sham device that was used for 8 hours each night for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in average daily NPRS from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at 4 and 6 weeks.

Results: Sixty-one participants were recruited, and 51 participants completed the study at 4 weeks. Both the PEMF therapy and sham device groups showed improvements in average NPRS and PRWHE at 4 weeks, but there was not a significant improvement between groups. At 6 weeks, there was a significantly greater change in average NPRS from baseline in the PEMF therapy group compared with the sham device group (P = .02).

Conclusions: Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy may improve thumb CMC OA pain with sustained relief beyond the treatment period. Future studies will need to assess if adjusting treatment duration or other factors can enhance its efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信