galcanezumab与传统口服偏头痛预防药物3个月治疗效果:TRIUMPH研究结果

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1111/head.15045
Richard B Lipton, Miguel J A Láinez, Zubair Ahmed, Carlos Vallarino, Diego Novick, Maurice Vincent, Lars Viktrup, Rebecca L Robinson
{"title":"galcanezumab与传统口服偏头痛预防药物3个月治疗效果:TRIUMPH研究结果","authors":"Richard B Lipton, Miguel J A Láinez, Zubair Ahmed, Carlos Vallarino, Diego Novick, Maurice Vincent, Lars Viktrup, Rebecca L Robinson","doi":"10.1111/head.15045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assesses the 3-month effectiveness of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies comparing the effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications are limited. However, such comparisons in real-world settings are useful for decision-making by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRIUMPH is an ongoing, international, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with migraine, initiating or switching to new preventive medication with a focus on galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications. Data for this analysis were collected from February 25, 2020, through February 9, 2023. All treatment decisions were at the physicians' discretion. The primary outcome was a 3-month response based on reductions in physician-recorded monthly migraine headache days: ≥50% (episodic migraine) or ≥30% (chronic migraine). The difference in the proportion of responders between treatments was assessed after adjusting for baseline cohort differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2813 patients, 1105 received galcanezumab and 1293 received traditional oral migraine preventive medications. The weighted response rate at 3 months was greater with galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications (46.6% vs. 34.5%; p < 0.001). Additional 3-month mean changes from baseline for galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications included a reduction in monthly migraine headache days (-5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.2 to -5.2] vs. -4.1 [95% CI, -4.5 to -3.7]), and an improvement in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive score (19.4 [95% CI, 17.6-21.3] vs. 10.2 [95% CI, 8.6-11.8]), respectively (both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study showed that patients receiving galcanezumab had greater treatment effectiveness after 3 months than those receiving traditional oral migraine preventive medications across multiple measures, including migraine headache days, various responder rate thresholds, change in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive scores, and types of migraine. These findings are representative of clinical practice settings and may help physicians in making treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment effectiveness of galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications at 3 months: Results from the TRIUMPH study.\",\"authors\":\"Richard B Lipton, Miguel J A Láinez, Zubair Ahmed, Carlos Vallarino, Diego Novick, Maurice Vincent, Lars Viktrup, Rebecca L Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.15045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assesses the 3-month effectiveness of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies comparing the effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications are limited. However, such comparisons in real-world settings are useful for decision-making by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRIUMPH is an ongoing, international, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with migraine, initiating or switching to new preventive medication with a focus on galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications. Data for this analysis were collected from February 25, 2020, through February 9, 2023. All treatment decisions were at the physicians' discretion. The primary outcome was a 3-month response based on reductions in physician-recorded monthly migraine headache days: ≥50% (episodic migraine) or ≥30% (chronic migraine). The difference in the proportion of responders between treatments was assessed after adjusting for baseline cohort differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2813 patients, 1105 received galcanezumab and 1293 received traditional oral migraine preventive medications. The weighted response rate at 3 months was greater with galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications (46.6% vs. 34.5%; p < 0.001). Additional 3-month mean changes from baseline for galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications included a reduction in monthly migraine headache days (-5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.2 to -5.2] vs. -4.1 [95% CI, -4.5 to -3.7]), and an improvement in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive score (19.4 [95% CI, 17.6-21.3] vs. 10.2 [95% CI, 8.6-11.8]), respectively (both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study showed that patients receiving galcanezumab had greater treatment effectiveness after 3 months than those receiving traditional oral migraine preventive medications across multiple measures, including migraine headache days, various responder rate thresholds, change in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive scores, and types of migraine. These findings are representative of clinical practice settings and may help physicians in making treatment decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体galcanezumab与传统口服偏头痛预防药物的3个月疗效。背景:比较降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体与传统口服偏头痛预防药物的有效性的研究有限。然而,这种在现实环境中的比较对患者、医疗保健提供者和决策者的决策是有用的。方法:TRIUMPH是一项正在进行的国际前瞻性观察队列研究,研究对象是成年偏头痛患者,这些患者开始或转向新的预防药物,重点是galcanezumab与传统口服偏头痛预防药物的对比。该分析的数据收集于2020年2月25日至2023年2月9日。所有的治疗决定都由医生自行决定。主要结局是3个月的缓解,基于医生记录的每月偏头痛天数减少:≥50%(发作性偏头痛)或≥30%(慢性偏头痛)。在调整基线队列差异后,评估不同治疗之间应答者比例的差异。结果:2813例患者中,1105例接受galcanezumab治疗,1293例接受传统口服偏头痛预防药物治疗。与传统的口服偏头痛预防药物相比,galcanezumab在3个月时的加权缓解率更高(46.6% vs 34.5%;结论:这项研究的结果表明,接受galcanezumab治疗的患者在3个月后比接受传统口服偏头痛预防药物治疗的患者有更大的治疗效果,包括偏头痛天数、各种反应率阈值、偏头痛特异性生活质量、角色功能限制评分的变化和偏头痛类型。这些发现具有临床实践的代表性,可能有助于医生做出治疗决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment effectiveness of galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications at 3 months: Results from the TRIUMPH study.

Objective: This study assesses the 3-month effectiveness of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications.

Background: Studies comparing the effectiveness of calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications are limited. However, such comparisons in real-world settings are useful for decision-making by patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

Methods: TRIUMPH is an ongoing, international, prospective observational cohort study of adult patients with migraine, initiating or switching to new preventive medication with a focus on galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications. Data for this analysis were collected from February 25, 2020, through February 9, 2023. All treatment decisions were at the physicians' discretion. The primary outcome was a 3-month response based on reductions in physician-recorded monthly migraine headache days: ≥50% (episodic migraine) or ≥30% (chronic migraine). The difference in the proportion of responders between treatments was assessed after adjusting for baseline cohort differences.

Results: Of 2813 patients, 1105 received galcanezumab and 1293 received traditional oral migraine preventive medications. The weighted response rate at 3 months was greater with galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications (46.6% vs. 34.5%; p < 0.001). Additional 3-month mean changes from baseline for galcanezumab versus traditional oral migraine preventive medications included a reduction in monthly migraine headache days (-5.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.2 to -5.2] vs. -4.1 [95% CI, -4.5 to -3.7]), and an improvement in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive score (19.4 [95% CI, 17.6-21.3] vs. 10.2 [95% CI, 8.6-11.8]), respectively (both p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Findings from this study showed that patients receiving galcanezumab had greater treatment effectiveness after 3 months than those receiving traditional oral migraine preventive medications across multiple measures, including migraine headache days, various responder rate thresholds, change in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life-Role Function Restrictive scores, and types of migraine. These findings are representative of clinical practice settings and may help physicians in making treatment decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信