丁丙诺啡和大麻二酚共同施用降低了骨科创伤小鼠模型的存活率。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1683842
Caroline Bouchard, Geneviève Frégeau, Ian Massé, Louis De Beaumont
{"title":"丁丙诺啡和大麻二酚共同施用降低了骨科创伤小鼠模型的存活率。","authors":"Caroline Bouchard, Geneviève Frégeau, Ian Massé, Louis De Beaumont","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1683842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Analgesic selection following orthopedic trauma presents unique challenges due to potential drug interactions and physiological stress. The impact of different analgesic regimens - buprenorphine, cannabidiol (CBD), their combination, or vehicle - on survival was investigated in a murine model of tibial fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty male C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to one of four group: (1) Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously every 12 h for 3 days) plus cannabidiol (CBD, 100 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally once daily for 7 days); (2) CBD only; (3) Buprenorphine + vehicle; or (4) Vehicle only. All animals also received carprofen (20 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily for 3 days). Survival was monitored over 7 days post-injury, and necropsies were performed to identify probable causes of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following an orthopedic trauma, mice that received buprenorphine plus CBD exhibited significantly lower survival than those that received either treatment alone or vehicle only (p = 0.0049 and p = 0.02, respectively). No differences were noted between the other groups. Necropsy revealed gastrointestinal complications in most fatalities, while two deaths were linked to acute respiratory arrest post-injection.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that while buprenorphine and CBD are individually well-tolerated, their co-administration may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in murine orthopedic trauma models. Combining cannabinoids and opioids in translational research requires caution and emphasizes the need for mechanistic evaluation in preclinical models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1683842"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buprenorphine and cannabidiol co-administration reduces survival in a mouse model of orthopedic trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Bouchard, Geneviève Frégeau, Ian Massé, Louis De Beaumont\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2025.1683842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Analgesic selection following orthopedic trauma presents unique challenges due to potential drug interactions and physiological stress. The impact of different analgesic regimens - buprenorphine, cannabidiol (CBD), their combination, or vehicle - on survival was investigated in a murine model of tibial fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty male C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to one of four group: (1) Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously every 12 h for 3 days) plus cannabidiol (CBD, 100 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally once daily for 7 days); (2) CBD only; (3) Buprenorphine + vehicle; or (4) Vehicle only. All animals also received carprofen (20 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily for 3 days). Survival was monitored over 7 days post-injury, and necropsies were performed to identify probable causes of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following an orthopedic trauma, mice that received buprenorphine plus CBD exhibited significantly lower survival than those that received either treatment alone or vehicle only (p = 0.0049 and p = 0.02, respectively). No differences were noted between the other groups. Necropsy revealed gastrointestinal complications in most fatalities, while two deaths were linked to acute respiratory arrest post-injection.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that while buprenorphine and CBD are individually well-tolerated, their co-administration may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in murine orthopedic trauma models. Combining cannabinoids and opioids in translational research requires caution and emphasizes the need for mechanistic evaluation in preclinical models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1683842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460340/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1683842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1683842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于潜在的药物相互作用和生理应激,骨科创伤后镇痛药物的选择提出了独特的挑战。在小鼠胫骨骨折模型中研究了不同镇痛方案-丁丙诺啡,大麻二酚(CBD),它们的组合或载体-对生存的影响。方法:雄性C57BL/6小鼠80只,随机分为4组:(1)丁丙诺啡(0.1 mg/kg,每12 h皮下给药,连续3 d) +大麻二酚(CBD, 100 mg/kg,每天腹腔给药1次,连续7 d);(2)仅限CBD;(3)丁丙诺啡+载药;或(4)仅限车辆。所有动物同时给予卡洛芬(20 mg/kg,皮下注射,每日1次,连用3天)。在损伤后7天内监测生存情况,并进行尸检以确定可能的死亡原因。结果:在骨科创伤后,接受丁丙诺啡加CBD治疗的小鼠的存活率明显低于单独接受治疗或仅接受载体治疗的小鼠(p = 0.0049和p = 0.02)。其他组之间没有发现差异。尸检显示,大多数死亡病例出现胃肠道并发症,而两例死亡病例与注射后急性呼吸骤停有关。讨论:这些发现表明,虽然丁丙诺啡和CBD单独耐受性良好,但在小鼠骨科创伤模型中,它们的联合使用可能会增加不良后果的风险。在转化研究中结合大麻素和阿片类药物需要谨慎,并强调需要在临床前模型中进行机制评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buprenorphine and cannabidiol co-administration reduces survival in a mouse model of orthopedic trauma.

Introduction: Analgesic selection following orthopedic trauma presents unique challenges due to potential drug interactions and physiological stress. The impact of different analgesic regimens - buprenorphine, cannabidiol (CBD), their combination, or vehicle - on survival was investigated in a murine model of tibial fracture.

Methods: Eighty male C57BL/6 mice were randomly assigned to one of four group: (1) Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously every 12 h for 3 days) plus cannabidiol (CBD, 100 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally once daily for 7 days); (2) CBD only; (3) Buprenorphine + vehicle; or (4) Vehicle only. All animals also received carprofen (20 mg/kg, subcutaneously, once daily for 3 days). Survival was monitored over 7 days post-injury, and necropsies were performed to identify probable causes of death.

Results: Following an orthopedic trauma, mice that received buprenorphine plus CBD exhibited significantly lower survival than those that received either treatment alone or vehicle only (p = 0.0049 and p = 0.02, respectively). No differences were noted between the other groups. Necropsy revealed gastrointestinal complications in most fatalities, while two deaths were linked to acute respiratory arrest post-injection.

Discussion: These findings suggest that while buprenorphine and CBD are individually well-tolerated, their co-administration may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in murine orthopedic trauma models. Combining cannabinoids and opioids in translational research requires caution and emphasizes the need for mechanistic evaluation in preclinical models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信