{"title":"Ramucirumab +紫杉醇作为晚期her2阴性胃癌或胃-食管结癌患者的切换维持:成本-效果分析","authors":"Jiefeng Luo, Zhengxiong Li, Qiong Du, Jiyong Liu","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1616826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ARMANI trial demonstrated that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (switch maintenance group) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) compared to continued first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group). However, its cost-effectiveness remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness from the Chinese and United States (US) healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of switch maintenance group versus control group over a 10-year time horizon. Survival data were sourced from the ARMANI trial. Cost and utility were derived from open-access databases and published literature. The robustness of the results was verified through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Additionally, subgroup analysis and scenario analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The switch maintenance group yielded incremental gains of 0.15 QALYs in China and 0.16 QALYs in the US, with corresponding incremental costs of $56,738.32 and $185,250.55, resulting in ICERs of $373,219.84/QALY and $1,193,220.74/QALY, respectively. For the PD-L1 CPS ≥5 subgroup, incremental QALYs increased to 0.24 and 0.25, with incremental costs rising to $62,741.24 and $206,107.13, yielding ICERs of $266,259.94/QALY and $835,740.90/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility of PFS, the price of ramucirumab, and patient body weight were the most influential factors on the ICER, with consistent results observed from both Chinese and US perspectives. To be cost-effective in a 50% of chance, ramucirumab would need to reduce its price to 14.2% of the original price ($0.743 per mg) in China and 13.92% ($2.088 per mg) in the US, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to continuing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced HER2-negative GC or GEJC in China and US.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1616826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jiefeng Luo, Zhengxiong Li, Qiong Du, Jiyong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2025.1616826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ARMANI trial demonstrated that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (switch maintenance group) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) compared to continued first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group). However, its cost-effectiveness remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness from the Chinese and United States (US) healthcare system perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of switch maintenance group versus control group over a 10-year time horizon. Survival data were sourced from the ARMANI trial. Cost and utility were derived from open-access databases and published literature. The robustness of the results was verified through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Additionally, subgroup analysis and scenario analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The switch maintenance group yielded incremental gains of 0.15 QALYs in China and 0.16 QALYs in the US, with corresponding incremental costs of $56,738.32 and $185,250.55, resulting in ICERs of $373,219.84/QALY and $1,193,220.74/QALY, respectively. For the PD-L1 CPS ≥5 subgroup, incremental QALYs increased to 0.24 and 0.25, with incremental costs rising to $62,741.24 and $206,107.13, yielding ICERs of $266,259.94/QALY and $835,740.90/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility of PFS, the price of ramucirumab, and patient body weight were the most influential factors on the ICER, with consistent results observed from both Chinese and US perspectives. To be cost-effective in a 50% of chance, ramucirumab would need to reduce its price to 14.2% of the original price ($0.743 per mg) in China and 13.92% ($2.088 per mg) in the US, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to continuing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced HER2-negative GC or GEJC in China and US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1616826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463587/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1616826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1616826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Objectives: The ARMANI trial demonstrated that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (switch maintenance group) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) compared to continued first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (control group). However, its cost-effectiveness remained unclear. This study aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness from the Chinese and United States (US) healthcare system perspective.
Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to compare the total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of switch maintenance group versus control group over a 10-year time horizon. Survival data were sourced from the ARMANI trial. Cost and utility were derived from open-access databases and published literature. The robustness of the results was verified through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Additionally, subgroup analysis and scenario analysis were conducted.
Results: The switch maintenance group yielded incremental gains of 0.15 QALYs in China and 0.16 QALYs in the US, with corresponding incremental costs of $56,738.32 and $185,250.55, resulting in ICERs of $373,219.84/QALY and $1,193,220.74/QALY, respectively. For the PD-L1 CPS ≥5 subgroup, incremental QALYs increased to 0.24 and 0.25, with incremental costs rising to $62,741.24 and $206,107.13, yielding ICERs of $266,259.94/QALY and $835,740.90/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the utility of PFS, the price of ramucirumab, and patient body weight were the most influential factors on the ICER, with consistent results observed from both Chinese and US perspectives. To be cost-effective in a 50% of chance, ramucirumab would need to reduce its price to 14.2% of the original price ($0.743 per mg) in China and 13.92% ($2.088 per mg) in the US, respectively.
Conclusion: Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel is unlikely to be cost-effective compared to continuing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for patients with advanced HER2-negative GC or GEJC in China and US.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.